Methinks someone doesn't know what "mansplaining" is.

Here, let me break down why that's a mansplain:

1. The man made a technical statement about what Signal was planning, talking with unearned (as it turns out) authority.
2. A woman negated said statement saying that the opposite was true.
3. The man, instead of maybe backing down and double-checking his facts, doubled-down instead on his incorrect statement, speaking with a certainty that rivals an LLMbecile's hallucinations.
4. The woman reveals that she is actually the authority and that the man's entire fronting was bullshit.

That's the mansplain. Someone who doesn't know shit corrected a woman who literally knows for certain without at any point considering that, perhaps, the woman is right.

Because when are women ever right?

Now fuck off the channel.