581
submitted 1 year ago by L4s@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world

The Supreme Court justice used wealthy connections through the Horatio Alger Association, a scholarship organization, to benefit himself and his wife.

all 37 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] mr_sparkle@lemmy.world 97 points 1 year ago

Must be nice to be openly corrupt and not have any consequences.

[-] SpezCanLigmaBalls@lemmy.world 28 points 1 year ago

I know right. It’s like the meme of “nothing ever happens” but for real. People get fired for having weed in their piss and this dude is manipulating a whole country based on who gives him the most money

[-] dudinax@programming.dev 8 points 1 year ago

Guy from the Navy came for a demonstration and he wouldn't let us buy him a McDonald's cheeseburger.

[-] afraid_of_zombies2@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago

Meanwhile at work I can't take a gift over five dollars and if I get like a box of chocolate I leave it in the break room.

Amazing how much integrity you must show is inverse to the amount of damages not showing it will cause.

[-] mattdaaaamon@lemmy.world 57 points 1 year ago

I wish I was surprised. What a sham court

[-] cultsuperstar@lemmy.ml 11 points 1 year ago

And we're stuck with it for the foreseeable future.

[-] henfredemars@infosec.pub 10 points 1 year ago

The greatest harm isn't even in the actions of the court itself, but it is in the undermining of institutions and confidence in a just system even further.

[-] afraid_of_zombies2@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

I got a bogus moving violation ticket in a ghetto. Decided to fight it. Watched as minority after minority got their ass handed to them in traffic court. Cops are super rude about everything. Few months later I get jury duty. Hispanic man accused of a violent crime...ok yeah. I have already seen how the sausage is made.

Now I didn't get picked they had enough before they even got to me but I admit I would be very disinclined to take the justice systems word. Maybe that is the wrong attitude to have. Just because the justice system is very very imperfect doesn't mean that there is no crime.

Everytime the justice system does something like this. Mistreats minorities or the poor, refuses to go after the powerful it weakens it's authority. And we are all worse off.

[-] TechnoBabble@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

I agree, never trust the justice system to get things right. But also, don't let the poor reputation of the justice system get in the way of protecting victims of crime in cases involving minorities.

Minorities are much less likely to get the attention they need from investigators when they're the victim of a crime. And like everyone, they're often victimized by someone from their own community.

It's an incredibly nuanced problem that isn't easy to sum up in an easily digestible comment.

[-] Hedup@lemm.ee 6 points 1 year ago

And I blame those that didn't vote in 2016.

[-] Shartacus@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago
[-] nul9o9@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

French height shorteners.

[-] Moyer1666@lemmy.world 40 points 1 year ago

I mean I assumed what we found out wasn't the end of his corruption and I assume this isn't either. I don't trust him so I'll never know. He needs to be impeached.

[-] someguy3@lemmy.ca 28 points 1 year ago
[-] leo6@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

They can't even spell shame. As soon as they get to S-H- they go I-T-Y-E-A-H-I-L-L-T-A-K-E-T-H-E-M-O-N-E-Y-F-U-C-K-E-M!!!

[-] EfficaciousSkink@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

These "justices" are a national disgrace and make a mockery of our justice system. They must be impeached and removed and ethics and honor restored. (This requires a 2/3 vote in the Senate which is unlikely to happen since many senators are equally corrupt and need to be removed as well.)

[-] AlaskaMan@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

At this point just investigate the entire SCOTUS and let the cards fall where they may. If all need removed when the dust settles, so be it.

[-] eran_morad@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

yeah bruh the repub sc is illegitimate and openly corrupt. fuck ‘em.

[-] Cringedrif@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

So...why is no one dealing with all the corruption coming out?

[-] Theoneyiv@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

Because they police themselves

[-] CannaVet@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

The judges have judged the judges and found no wrongdoing on the part of the judges.

[-] _number8_@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

brandon must declare this session illegitimate and do the cases again after he's removed

he has the power, he can just say it. andrew jackson just did what he wanted didn't he

[-] MelonTheMan@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

You're right, but Biden won't do shit, he's a status quo boomer in a suit.

And I'll be voting for him again next year.

[-] AttractiveNuisance@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

What? No. Can you imagine the clusterfuck if Biden just ignored the constitution and declared a court "illegitimate?" We need the court to be expanded and then for the cases to be brought again by the DOJ and other parties and have the SCOTUS overturn them.

[-] SinningStromgald@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

More reasons we need to end lobbying and update disclosure rules to include anything they didn't buy themselves.

If Biden wanted an excuse to stack the court then this is it.

[-] SrElsewhere@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

An oft-repeated admonition in legal circles is that lawyers should avoid even so much as the appearance of impropriety. And that's before taking the bench. Any suggestion that any of this was done unknowingly is preposterous.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

And here I thought he slept in his camper in Walmart parking lots like he told us. Could it be that a Supreme Court justice actually lives a life of luxury?!

[-] astral_avocado@lemmynsfw.com 5 points 1 year ago

Is there a legislative mechanism or body that has the power to investigate the SCOTUS? Or are they beyond punitive measures? Honestly asking for an experts opinion here

[-] merc@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago

Since the Supreme Court is at the top of their branch of the government, it would have to be another branch, either legislative or executive.

The US congress has the power to impeach (i.e. charge with a crime / misdemeanor / transgression) a justice, and send that case to the senate for a trial.

Unfortunately, the US congress is Republican-controlled, so you'd have to convince a very significant fraction of the Republicans to vote to investigate and charge the guy whose corruption is leading to so many wins for their side.

The other option is a criminal investigation by the FBI, which is part of the executive branch. But, that would require that what Thomas did violated federal laws. I doubt he actually broke bribery laws, or would be stupid enough to break them while he suspected he might be under a federal investigation.

If only the founding fathers had any background in game theory. This system of "checks and balances" only works when the majority of the people involved have noble, self-sacrificing ideals.

[-] Necromnomicon@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

I honestly don't know, but if there was, it would require the people who wanted them in the position in the first place to agree to implement it. I don't see that happening.

[-] Ducks@ducks.dev 5 points 1 year ago

I remember learning in high school about the corruption under Herbert Hoover's administration and the entire federal government at the time. They made it out to seem like those days are behind us. The curriculum needs updating because those days never ended.

[-] Tot@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Shocking. Just absolutely shocking!

/s in case that needs to be stated.

[-] TokenBoomer@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

In another universe, Anita Hill went on to become president after 1991

this post was submitted on 09 Jul 2023
581 points (100.0% liked)

politics

19089 readers
3431 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS