82
submitted 1 year ago by Xenon@lemmy.world to c/europe@feddit.de
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] zipfelwurster@feddit.de 45 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

If anyone else comes here - go watch the posted video but stay away from this comment section.

I have absolutely no idea how such a level-headed and well-put-together speech appealing at human decency and respect towards each other devolved into such a vile comment section.

I assume most of the commenters either didn't watch the video or purposefully ignored its content to instead incite more hate.

[-] thilo@lemmy.ml 13 points 1 year ago

Because Habeck did not confirm their biases.

[-] SitD@feddit.de 4 points 1 year ago

commenters be biased and brownpilled 😎

[-] thilo@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

what is wrong with brown pilled :( Isn't silent quitting the sane thing to do?

[-] devprc@feddit.de 26 points 1 year ago

Very good and level headed comment, rightfully met with wide acclaim across the political landscape in Germany.

[-] febra@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

So Germany is willing to look the other way as Israel is butchering thousands of innocents. The fact that I even voted for this guy's party..

[-] dumdum666@kbin.social 14 points 1 year ago

You should volunteer yourself as a human shield for Hamas then, so a Palestinian doesn’t have to be a human shield for Hamas.

[-] febra@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

Human shield or not, Israel is killing innocent people using this disgusting excuse. If a terrorist would take your family hostage I'm sure you'd be more than happy to have Israel airstrike all of them.

[-] dumdum666@kbin.social 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Don’t tell us what you DON’T want, tell us what you DO want: How would you personally handle this situation while securing the Israeli AND the Palestinian people. And by securing I mean not only temporary, but permanently.

But please don’t pretend that you actually could negotiate a peace with Hamas.

[-] febra@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

Hamas is a symptom. They will always be there in one form or another as long as palestinians live under systemic oppression. Sure, you can take out hamas, kill as many civillians as you want in doing so, and you'll only create more extremists. The west bank is illegally occupied by israeli forces imposing apartheid like laws. You don't have to take that from me, take it from the UN. Palestinians live in a segregated society, having to drive on segregated roads, go through checkpoints, and so on. The western world just looks the other way but loves to virtue signal and wave fingers at other countries doing what Israel is doing (look at Russia invading Ukraine). Many palestinians feel that they've been let down by the world and the democratic world order we love to boast so much about, and thus they turn to extremist ideologies. So, as long as Israel's stance towards the palestinian question doesn't change, and as long as they keep ilegally occupying their territories (west bank and until 15 years ago Gaza which they then threw under a blockade that crippled the lives of millions), extremists will keep on breeding. These are very fertile grounds for extremist ideologies.

Sure, they could genocide all palestinians and that would probably solve the problem, but is that who you want to support?

[-] dumdum666@kbin.social 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Quit trying to contextualize the murder done by Hamas and quit trying to evade the question.

That „symptom“ is NOW killing innocent civilians, Palestinians and Israeli alike. And yes, Hamas is responsible for every civilian death in Palestine - because they started this war.

I want to hear from you, since you claim to know better than anyone else, what can get done NOW, not years from now. What would you personally do different NOW in regards to Hamas.

[-] febra@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

Quit trying to contextualize the murder done by Hamas and quit trying to evade the question.

Contextualizing complex situations is very important if you are honestly, actually looking for solutions. This wasn't the first terrorist attack and won't be the last no matter how much wishful thinking you do on your side. Simplifying this and looking at one event in vacuum is a bastardization of history and the current problem, and does absolutely nothing to help the current situation.

Hamas is responsible for every civilian death in Palestine

That is a bastardization of the reality and reads like straight out propaganda to fuel even more innocent deaths. When a military force is butchering innocent civillians from the sky you can't just deflect the reality with a straight face while also claiming to have the moral high ground.

Every normal person can agree that the terrorist attack on October 7th was completely unjustified and an atrocity. At the same time, every normal person should also be able to agree that killing innocent civillians under collective punishment and painting them as collateral damage is an atrocity as well.

because they started this war.

This war hasn't started yesterday. Gaza has been under a military blockade for almost two decades now. The west bank has been under an apartheid military occupation for decades now. These hostilities might not amount to a formal declaration of war under your bureaucratic understanding of the world, but they are ineded hostile acts based on ethnicity.

I want to hear from you, since you claim to know better than anyone else, what can get done NOW, not years from now.

Well, besides the fact that I have never claimed such a thing, you should remember here that I am not going against "everyone else" on this one. You seem to be under the false impression that your opinion here is the mainstream one. The UN voted in an overwhelming majority for the cessation of the current hostilities in Gaza. They might not be all from the G7 nations that live under the impression that they have the moral high ground, but I'm sure they don't represent just a loud minority as you seem to believe. Anyway.

I am no diplomat. I can't say for sure what needs to be done right now, but I can recognize what is extremely wrong right now: and that is the butchering of innocent civillians under the pretext of collective punishment (which is illegal according to international humanitarian law). What I personally wish for is a two state solution where Israel stops illegally occupying lands and imposing an apartheid regime onto innocent civillians that have a right to live in the lands their ancestors lived in for centuries. That means removing all illegal settlements from said lands, pulling their military occupation out of said territory, and imposing normal borders (and protecting their borders) like every other nation does.

Hamas is a virus. They won't stop existing just because you kill the current hamas. They will keep popping up as long as the occupation and oppression continues to exist. If you want to heal a society from this extremism, you need to give them space, time, and the right to self determination. An oppressed people will never have inner peace.

My great great grandparents were sent to a jewish ghetto in the part of Romania where I'm from. The biggest jewish ghetto out of what is now considered Romania. They were romanian jews. They lived through some horrible times because of genocidal maniacs. They were pushed out of their homes, killed in the streets, treated as foreigners in their own land. My great great grandmother died in the holocaust. My great great grandfather disappeared. My great grandfather grew up as an orphan and never met his parents.

Gazans have gone through a very similar situation. They've been pushed out of their homes, oppressed, treated as lesser, cast aside. 70% of Gazans are refugees that fled their ancestral homes. They live in a ghetto with no rights to self determination. The walls around this enclosure are controlled by a regime that despises them and are the ones that take the decisions of what they get and when they get it. You can't tell me with a straight face that after decades of living in such dire conditions you are somehow surprised that extremism has found fertile grounds there.

So again, I ask you to have some sympathy here with the innocents being butchered daily by aistrikes of a regime that has always treated them as lesser individuals. And I do that as a part jew that sympathises with jewish history quite a lot.

Butchering civillians won't get you less hamas. It will just breed more extremism.

[-] dumdum666@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

A lot of words that are obviously meant to disguise the fact, that you still say NOTHING about what you would do differently. This is not how this works.

So again, I ask you to have some sympathy here with the innocents being butchered daily by aistrikes of a regime that has always treated them as lesser individuals. And I do that as a part jew that sympathises with jewish history quite a lot.

Butchering civillians won’t get you less hamas. It will just breed more extremism.

Why are you insinuating that I have no sympathy with the Palestinian civilians? Of course I do. But you have proven by now yourself, that there isn’t an alternative to the way Israel is reacting. Hamas in its current form has to get destroyed.

But as you like to talk about the Second World War so much: Was it wrong by the allied Forces to bombard German cities in WW2 and thereby also killing German civilians? Quite lots of them actually?

[-] febra@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

that you still say NOTHING about what you would do differently.

I just told you what I would do, you just fail to listen.

If you're looking for a straight up recipe chewed for you by a guy on the internet, here you go:

  • recognize Palestinian statehood as have done 138 of the 193 United Nations [1]
  • remove all illegal settlements that are recognized as a flagrant violation of international law [2]
  • dismantling of the Israeli apartheid system as recognized by UN [3] [4]
  • create an international tribunal led by the UN for all crimes against humanity commited by people on both sides [5]
  • enforce the borders of the two countries, including with UN peacekeepers if strictly necessary
  • ensure that both countries make amendments to their constitutions that won't allow any further hostilities
  • introduce a marshall plan equivalent for palestine to take it out of the dire and crippling financial situation it is in [6]
  • create programs that facilitate conversation on both sides, cultural exchange programs, etc. (wishful thinking here; I think the resentment is too big but it would be a good long-term solution)
  • create programs to financially help the victims of attacks on both sides (dead relatives, injuries, etc.) after taking the perpetrators to trial and sentencing them of course
  • create a financial program to repay all the palestinians that have been forcefully displaced from their homes [7]

After all of that is settled and both countries are on equal footing, if any further hostilities arise from either side, these should be handled by the UN without any kind of bias.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/State_of_Palestine#International_recognition

[2] https://press.un.org/en/2016/sc12657.doc.htm

[3] https://www.un.org/unispal/document/special-rapporteur-on-the-situation-of-human-rights-in-opt-israel-has-imposed-upon-palestine-an-apartheid-reality-in-a-post-apartheid-world-press-release/

[4] https://www.ohchr.org/en/press-releases/2022/03/israels-55-year-occupation-palestinian-territory-apartheid-un-human-rights

[5] https://www.ohchr.org/en/press-releases/2023/10/gaza-un-experts-decry-bombing-hospitals-and-schools-crimes-against-humanity

[6] https://press.un.org/en/2023/sc15462.doc.htm

[7] https://www.unrwa.org/palestine-refugees

[-] dumdum666@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

You are completely ignoring the fact that a fucking WAR is going on at the moment.

Are you really not able to understand that NOTHING you have posted, is going to happen for the foreseeable future? That the terror attack even made them next to impossible in a foreseeable future?

Chill, dude. Stop chosing and posting hate. There's enough of that in the world. Are you really going to blame a random person on the internet for not magically creating peace in a bloody century-old conflict?

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] febra@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Yes. Killing civillians is always wrong. Especially children. Be it the firebombing of Dresden or using weapons of mass destruction against japanese civillian populations.

But for the sake of the argument, let's say it's fine to kill a ton of innocent people. Maybe it is for you and we just have different moral perspectives on this issue. What do you do after destroying Hamas? You have a ton of dead civillians, mourning families, and a completely destroyed country with no future in sight. Would you support the formation of a sovereign democratic internationally recognized palestinian state? Would you support a marshall plan for Palestine?

[-] dumdum666@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

Would you support the formation of a sovereign democratic internationally recognized palestinian state?

Me personally? Yes, of course. If the Palestinians are actually going to agree to the borders that were set in 1948 as an example … but until now the Palestinians have rejected every attempt that was made for a two state solution. What makes you think, that they will accept borders now, that they have rejected before?

Would you support a marshall plan for Palestine?

Yes, I would.

My personal opinion is probably best represented by Harari Yuval Noah - English - with German Subtitles

[-] febra@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I am sorry to tell you this, but you definitely ought look deeper into the peace accords as they were discussed at the time. Especially the ones at Camp David which were supposed to be the most fruitious and the ones Palestinians "threw out the door". The Oslo accords were more of a guideline than a clear set of instructions.

Palestinians were supposed to:

  • be completely demilitarized
  • give Israel the right to send troops to Palestine in case of any emergency (what constitutes as an emergency was never defined)
  • ask Israel for approval for every diplomatic alliance Palestine would ever make
  • have military bases installed in Palestinian territory
  • give the Israeli military complete control of their airspace
  • have israeli military outposts be installed on the border between Palestine and Jordan
  • give Israel temporary control over Palestinian border crossings
  • give up 10% of the West Bank, the most fertile land in the West Bank, for 1% territorial gains of desert land near the Gaza strip (the land that would be conceded included symbolic and cultural territories such as the Al-Aqsa Mosque, whereas the Israeli land conceded was unspecified)
  • Israel would keep parts of the West Bank under temporary occupation, without a timespan being given
  • What constitutes the West Bank was to be defined by Israel and not by international law. Israel defined West Bank as being the internationally recognized West Bank minus all the settlements.

As you can see, all of these concessions would never amount to a completely sovereign Palestinian state, and as a result of that these talks failed in the end. Nonetheless, they did spawn new discussions and as a result of said discussion the Taba negotiations were born. With that being said, these concessions were in no way, shape, or form popular in Israel (only 25% of the Israeli public thought his positions on Camp David were just right as opposed to 58% of the public that thought Barak compromised too much). The Israeli prime minister at the time, Barak, facing elections, suspended the talks since it greatly affected his popularity in Israel. As a result of trying to broker a peace deal with Palestine, even a very bad one that was meant to fail as it was, he failed to get re-elected. The highly unbalanced concessions were already considered to be too much by Israelis.

Trying to paint Israel here as the ones willing to make concessions and the Palestinians as the ones throwing everything out the door is a highly cherry picked narrative that doesn't represent the reality at all.

I fully support a two-state solution, if and only if both states are treated as equals. The conditions listed above clearly do not create two equal states that both have full rights to self determination.

The discussions were doomed to fail from the get-go. You can read more on that on Wikipedia if you're interested in all the details. If wikipedia isn't a good enough source, there is a great book on this subject by a german professor specializing on the conflict between Israel and Palestine.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Nihilistra@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

Didn't Israel start this war by creating an apartheid state and genocide by deporting non jews to a Ghetto and making their live so miserable that people decide to fight against their oppressors?

Didn't Israel create Hamas? And propped them up? Israel wanted what happened, now they can go in full force and most idiots even applaud them for manipulating a people into war.

They learned from the US, maniacs that start wars by lying about the enemy planning to use WMD. No nation can should trust a word coming out of their mouths.

[-] dumdum666@kbin.social 7 points 1 year ago

Not a SINGLE word, what you would do differently.

ALL words excuses for Hamas murdering civilians.

Hamas doesn’t commit their terror attacks „for“ the Palestinians, they commit them, because they hate Israel and the Jews. If they would fight for the Palestinian civilians, they wouldn’t operate in or near civilian infrastructure, they wouldn’t wear civilian clothing and they would share their vast stockpiles with the Palestinian civilians.

[-] gapbetweenus@feddit.de 6 points 1 year ago

Israel is killing innocent people

Basically describing every war ever. Why also war should be avoided, which is very possible if involved people in power are interested in it, which does not seems to be the case on either side.

[-] febra@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Sadly that seems to be the truth. I don't see an end in sight for these hostilities. Neither Israel nor Hamas care about ending the war. Some of the current Israeli politicians leading the current cabinet have even went as far as to claim that Hamas is an asset for them. There's a great piece on this I read recently. Hamas on the other hand doesn't care about ending their hostilities due to their antisemitic islamist ideology.

[-] DarkThoughts@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago
[-] febra@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

How is that? I'm a gay, partly jewish guy, that is strongly left leaning and cares a lot about the climate and social issues. I have voted for the green party. I agree with their stance on Ukraine and Russia, which is why I am so confused by their stance on Israel. I never expected them to act in such a way. I agree with their climate policy. I agree with their urbanism policies. But the complete disregard they have shown towards palestinian lives is simply disgusting. But whatever, you tell me who I voted for.

Downvote all you want. The green voters aren't a monolithic voice and not all of us stand with the words of Robert Habeck. Antisemitism is horrible, everyone can agree with that. But his statements of full support for Israel... not even a word of real criticism for the way they're butchering little children and entire families. Disgusting. What the world has become. The left has now gone full circle. Literally finding excuses for the murder of civillians.

[-] DarkThoughts@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

Yes, this bullshit definitely makes your story and disinformation even more believable. You understand that people can actually check his words for themselves, right?

[-] febra@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Look. I went and listened to the speech again, because I don't want people to claim that I'm spreading misinformation here.

What I gathered from his speech, the main points:

  1. antisemitism is bad. Yes, every single moral human being should agree with that. Hating people based on their ethnicity and other traits they cannot change is absolutely never acceptable.
  2. people should condemn acts of terrorism. Again, yes. I fully agree with that. Killing innocents is absolutely never acceptable, be it terrorism or not. It's horrible.
  3. the right is holding back from attacking jews. I agree with that, but I don't think it's the time and place for these comments. He's talking about horrific acts of terrorism, he's talking about the fear some people live with right now and at the same time he's talking his opposition. It feels like he's hijacking the situation for political points and feels insensitive
  4. iran is somehow behind this. I don't think anyone has produced any evidence regarding that yet which just makes it sound like a weird conspiracy theory, and again, it feels out of place for a speech about antisemitism and acts of violence against innocents
  5. he's doing everything he can along his American partners to protect the lives of civillians in Gaza. This is where it's getting nasty in my opinion. The US has vetoed a call for a ceasefire in the UN security council. That is definitely not what I'd consider to count as "protecting the lives of civillians". And the fact taht he associates with the US here is even worse, since they were the only ones to veto any form of intervention on the side of the UN. This is why I left my original comment. I guess it was fairly inflamatory of me to comment that, but it felt extremely insensitive to see him say that while looking at the reality of the situation on the ground in Gaza right now, with so many innocents dying. Just "making sure water and medicine gets to Gaza" won't save those kids from being blown to pieces. Mind you, the water, food, electricity, and medicine that was cut off from these civillians by Israel in the first place. Not only that, but he goes as far as to say that he is reminding Israel of their commitment to international law, BUT no one expects that from Hamas... I'm sorry? He is literally relativising the deaths of civillians here just because Hamas are a bunch of fucking genocidal maniacs. He is litearlly adding a BUT after saying how Israel should respect human rights. You can't make this shit up. There should be absolutely no buts after talking about respecting human rights.
  6. all muslims in Germany are expected to publicly denounce Hamas. This one is straight up weird. It's like asking all jews to publicly denounce Israel for bombing kids. Hamas, a terrorist organization, doesn't represent all muslims and it's straight up racist to expect every muslim to talk about whatever Hamas is doing. Which brings me to the next point I gathered from his speech
  7. Germany has to support to Israel. Here he starts equating all jews with Israel somehow. Which is again, straight up weird, and partly antisemitic. Jews aren't all the property of Israel. Just as not all muslims are the property of Hamas. Treating an entire ethnic group as a monolithic collective is extremely problematic to me. I am partly jewish and german-romanian and do not agree with that. I feel more German and Romanian than I feel Israeli. I've never been to Israel and wouldn't call Israel my home country. Even though I could get an israeli citizenship any day by proof of my ancestors and gain access to live in a land my ancestors didn't even know to point on a map probably. With that being said, I fully support helping civillians affected by violence everywhere, anywhere, on all sides of this horrible conflict. I fully support the fight against antisemitism and stand by it, and stood by it for ages now. But offering critique of Israel is somehow problematic. One can easily condemn acts of terrorism while also putting them in a historical context. That doesn't mean you are relativising anything. One can condemn the state of Israel for the shit they're doing to civillians in Gaza and the West Bank. I know he also says that everyone is allowed to criticize Israel, but for some reason his government falls short of doing so. Sure, individual civillians can, but I'd expect government officials with a spine to actually do it too when they see all the completely unjust suffering in Gaza right now.
  8. the two state solution. He then briefly mentions the two state solution, but falls short of going deeper into that highly complex subject. He throws all the blame on Hamas here while conveniently ignoring that Israel is also straight up refusing the two state solution, just as Hamas does. Not only that, but Israel even has hopes in expanding their illegal settlements (which he of course briefly criticizes, but again, not much substance there). This can be easily found in their government's policy guidelines where they clearly state that "The Jewish people have an exclusive and inalienable right to all parts of the Land of Israel. The government will promote and develop the settlement of all parts of the Land of Israel — in the Galilee, the Negev, the Golan and Judea and Samaria.". Germany is hereby supporting a full on far-right theocratic regime of ultraorthodox lunatics that are openly calling for the expansion of their lands in the detriment of the innocent civillians living there that happen to be non-jewish.

I'd rather have a Germany that works towards a humanitarian solution, not a Germany that is straight up supporting some very horrible people and supports the US in blocking any kind of UN intervention. I don't mind calling out antisemitism, I've been doing that my entire life. And I have read more than enough books on jewish history, dug through archives to learn about my great great grandparents that died in the holocaust, and much more. I don't mind calling out terrorism either, every sane human should. But I very much mind this kind of rhetoric towards unconditional support for a far-right expansionist regime. Especially one represented by a far-right religious zionist coalition, that claims that some biblical lands that currently happen to be under palestinian control should be owned by them because their book says so. Here you can read more about them. Is this really who we want to throw our unconditional support at? A cabinet filled with people like Itamar Ben-Gvir that literally has a poster of a terrorist that killed a bunch of people in his office? The guy that put a billbioard of arab opposition politicians in a town and called for their expulsion? Man I'm so over this. Believe what you want. I voted green for a reason. Now I don't know who to vote for anymore. I sure as hell don't want to vote for the putinists further to the left, and the more to the right you go than the green party the worse it gets.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] branchial@feddit.de 8 points 1 year ago

Call out the genocide. Looking away while saying "never again" is the utter peak of cynicism. You and your government are complicit in this genocide. Step down.

[-] DarkThoughts@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago

Habeck literally calls out both sides wrongdoings instead of ignoring one for the other, while differentiating Hamas & Palestinians, and the Israeli government & Jews as a whole. Something a lot of people wanted from other leaders & countries as well. But you do you with your anti-Green propaganda shit.

[-] yojimbo@sopuli.xyz 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

~~This could have been expressed in a single sentence: The fact that Israel is punishing all citizens of Ghaza for Hamas attacks does not mean that Germans should act the same towards the Jews (but we don't mind if you do towards Iranians and such). Tragic.~~

[-] zipfelwurster@feddit.de 22 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

This is objectively false.

Habeck says in the video that he has seen a terrifying growth in antisemitism in Germany where members of the Jewish faith are scared to leave the house on their own or publicly display religious symbols due to open hostility. He talks about a responsibility of Germans due to the central role in the holocaust but also how the Islamic world has not distanced itself enough from the atrocities committed by the hamas. He even remarked that one doesn't have to agree with some of Israel's politics - even explicitly naming the settlements in the Gaza / West Bank region - but that this should not be any excuse for antisemitism.

I will say again what I said in another comment - The video is an appeal to human decency and respect. Shame on you for willfully and stubbornly ignoring that and derailing the conversation to incite further hate.

[-] yojimbo@sopuli.xyz 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Yes, life in Gaza is life in poverty without prospects for the future. Yes, the settler movement in the West Bank is fomenting discord and robs the Palestinians of hope and rights and, increasingly, lives. And the suffering of the civilian population now at war is a fact, a terrible fact.

You are right and I am wrong I haven't read the whole video. I am ashamed. Insert whichever invective you like - I have few. There is no excuse.

[-] zipfelwurster@feddit.de 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I respect you for admitting you were wrong. That takes courage.

Also maybe it wasn't smart leaving that part out of my reply.

[-] S_204@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Thanks for acknowledging your mistakes. We should all learn from this post.

[-] dumdum666@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago
[-] zipfelwurster@feddit.de 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Unfortunately it's hard to tell trolls apart from real people in here.

It somewhat reminds me of the height of covid in online discussions - people turn off their brains and fall back on basic emotions and empty phrases.

[-] DarkThoughts@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago

Doesn't matter if it is his actual opinion or not. You still helped to clarify disinformation that someone might've just believed.

[-] dumdum666@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

I have dealt with those people quite often on Lemmy.ml and even Lemmy.world

They are not here to discuss. They are here to spread hate and do their virtue signaling to Hamas apologists - because most of the time they are Hamas supporters themselves.

[-] DarkThoughts@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

He's clarifying blatant disinformation (something the Greens suffering a lot of thanks to various propaganda campaigns against them). A lot of people might read it and take their comment for granted.

I haven't seen it yet, so I don't know if he said more than what you write.

What you describe is that he asks of Muslims everywhere to identify with Hamas and then to distance themselves from them. Does he address growing anti-muslim racism? Because from what you write it indeed sounds as if he appeals to human decency towards one side while ignoring the other.

No one except antisemites blames Jews for what Israel does, but on the other hand the Islamic world is blamed for Hamas terror and asked to distance themselves from it. Those are double standards.

[-] dumdum666@kbin.social 9 points 1 year ago

So instead of writing long texts, you maybe should watch the video instead of accusing him of being „one sided“?

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] dumdum666@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago

I posted this before as an reply, but I think this is relevant for everyone: Hamas doubles down and says it was only the first October 7 attack of many to come

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 02 Nov 2023
82 points (100.0% liked)

Europe

8332 readers
1 users here now

News/Interesting Stories/Beautiful Pictures from Europe 🇪🇺

(Current banner: Thunder mountain, Germany, 🇩🇪 ) Feel free to post submissions for banner pictures

Rules

(This list is obviously incomplete, but it will get expanded when necessary)

  1. Be nice to each other (e.g. No direct insults against each other);
  2. No racism, antisemitism, dehumanisation of minorities or glorification of National Socialism allowed;
  3. No posts linking to mis-information funded by foreign states or billionaires.

Also check out !yurop@lemm.ee

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS