137
submitted 11 months ago by Red0ctober@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world

Both Republicans likely need the support of Democrats to prevail in their battle over the speakership. Here’s how that could shake out.

all 25 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 73 points 11 months ago

His plan is simple. Pay some underage girls for sex.

Winning.

[-] 520@kbin.social 35 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Oh come on, cut the guy some slack 🙄

That joke's getting older than the girls he pays for sex.

[-] Illuminostro@lemmy.world 8 points 11 months ago

You forgot the coke.

Geeking.

[-] Drusas@kbin.social 6 points 11 months ago

Starting to get a little too old for him there.

[-] Ertebolle@kbin.social 35 points 11 months ago

The other side of the argument is that McCarthy is the GOP’s greatest fundraiser, and getting rid of him would help Democrats take back the House. No replacement for McCarthy would have the same set of relationships and the donor network and political operation.

This is, to me, the winning argument - it hurts them politically, both by taking away their best fundraiser and by replacing him with somebody who's likely to be even more extreme and so do even more dumb things the Democrats can campaign against. A McCarthy replacement is even likely to shut down the government in 45 days than McCarthy is, and for Democrats that's probably a good thing - Republicans screwing up air travel right before Thanksgiving and taking away government employees' paychecks right before Christmas.

Is it good for the country, maybe not, but Republicans losing the House in 2024 will do several orders of magnitude more good for the country than whatever harm might be done by that short-term idiocy.

[-] errer@lemmy.world 14 points 11 months ago

Let them fight.

[-] RampantParanoia2365@kbin.social 14 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Why is he starting to look like Richard Nixon? Is this like that thing with the crab formfactor?

[-] yemmly@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago

How do you know he isn’t Richard Nixon?

[-] gazoinksboe@lemmy.world 9 points 11 months ago

This guy looks like a straight up cartoon villain

[-] Everythingispenguins@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago

This guy looks like a straight up ~~cartoon~~ villain

Fixed it for you.

[-] Rapidcreek@reddthat.com 7 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

The Republicans can clean up their own mess. Democrats will vote present on the motion to vacate. Unless a political promise is made, they'll vote for Congressman Hakeem Jeffries.

[-] halfempty@kbin.social 5 points 11 months ago

Excellent article exploring the many factors involved. Personally, I think that the dems should let the GOP thrash themselves into chaos.

[-] j4k3@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

Gotham beware of the Joker

this post was submitted on 01 Oct 2023
137 points (100.0% liked)

politics

18883 readers
3302 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS