229
submitted 2 months ago by nifty@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

What’s the rule for keeping money from your crimes?

top 21 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Letme@lemmy.world 66 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Duped into giving someone money, sure. Duped into receiving millions in exchange for creating media content that spreads misinformation... Not so sure about that.

[-] andrewta@lemmy.world 35 points 2 months ago

If it’s an actual crime then you lose the cash. But it has to be proven in a court room. So yeah…

[-] mp3@lemmy.ca 40 points 2 months ago
[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 16 points 2 months ago

Also, if you're rich, they let you do it.

[-] otp@sh.itjust.works 8 points 2 months ago

I don't think it counts if you're newly rich, though

[-] Kalkaline@leminal.space 2 points 2 months ago

How newly rich are we talking?

[-] frezik@midwest.social 1 points 2 months ago

In this case, the streamers themselves might not be guilty. The crime is being a foreign agent paying the media without being registered. That's on the foreign agents, not the streamers.

That still might mean they don't get to keep the money, but it can also be useful to prosecutors to let it slide. It's a classic move to give the lower level guys a pass to flip them against the higher level guys. Keep working your way up until you, hopefully, get the leader, or someone close, anyway.

[-] NOT_RICK@lemmy.world 33 points 2 months ago

Right-wing influencers say they were dupes

It’s good they’re admitting they’re just a bunch of useful idiots, that’s the first step in getting better. They want to get better, right?

[-] meco03211@lemmy.world 19 points 2 months ago

Padme stare

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 28 points 2 months ago

"We didn't know who was giving us money to lie! What's the problem?"

[-] kent_eh@lemmy.ca 22 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

So their explanation is that they were too stupid to figure out why they were being given ridiculous amounts of money?

[-] frezik@midwest.social 2 points 2 months ago

They're not sending their best.

[-] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 20 points 2 months ago

In an interview following the indictment, Pool insisted the amount he was paid — $100,000 per video — was “around market value for offers we had already received,” and described it as “inconsequential” to his lifestyle.

Bullshit. They don't have enough reach to hit these numbers. There's no way they could get offered this much money and not wonder how they got so lucky. I mean, I realize the MAGA people have wildly distorted views of the world, but you'd have to be completely stupid not to think this was an incredible situation and highly unlikely.

[-] skozzii@lemmy.ca 14 points 2 months ago

They knew, we knew, so they knew....

[-] TheFonz@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

I just imagine Pim Toole grabbing the cash with his eyes closed as Lauren slides it across the table.

[-] MushuChupacabra@lemmy.world 12 points 2 months ago

We were duped, but we want to keep our thirty pieces of silver too.

[-] ptz@dubvee.org 6 points 2 months ago
[-] futatorius@lemm.ee 5 points 2 months ago

How convenient for them.

[-] bitswitch@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

"I was under the imperio curse I swear!"

this post was submitted on 13 Sep 2024
229 points (100.0% liked)

News

23296 readers
3139 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS