333
Garbage people.
They went on to monetize the shit out of their hate crime with several fox news appearances.
Absolutely garbage people and a failure of the justice system.
I think he also ran for state Senate but lost because losers gonna lose.
As he should have. I live in this shit hole state and it's a very small victory that he didn't win.
I also read an article detailing a bit about his life and he's an absolute piece of shit. He sued his sibling(s) to get the full inheritance when their parents died, and he cut off his other family from it once he got it.
Hello fellow Missourian! I've been planning to move away to be closer to friends, but I want to stick it out for the rest of this year so I can vote for abortion and hopefully tell the Republicans here to go fuck themselves in the process.
I've been wanting to move away for a while. My brother lives in Vegas and he wants us to move out there to be closer to him, and I'm considering it.
You might even call them “deplorables”.
Don't need to dehumanize them to describe how much they suck
Deplorable: deserving strong condemnation, shockingly bad in quality.
Describes exactly how bad they suck.
Doesn't say they are not human people, just that they're the kind of human people we deplore.
At the risk of more downvotes, all I was saying is that blanketing a whole group of people in a term such as "deplorables" is a slippery slope to not seeing them as human at all. Not saying they don't deserve to be described that way.
What an odd thing to say... For one, "slippery slope" is literally the name of the logical fallacy you're doing here.
But also, think about what you're saying for a moment. How does accurately describing a person's behavior dehumanize them? Are we just supposed to never acknowledge shitty behavior in others?
It's kind of the opposite... I've never heard an animal described as "deplorable". I'm not sure they're capable of it? So if anything, the term is humanizing.
I'm pretty sure if you put out a giant basket and labeled it DEPLORABLES, you'd soon find it filled to the rim with people wearing MAGA hats who climbed in there by themselves.
Maybe you were too young in 2016, but...
I understand that its a term people use to describe others and that its been used in recent history for these exact people but that doesn't make it not dehumanizing. My point is just that there should be "people" following "deplorable." Maybe I was caught up in the semantics of the phrase but it was on my mind seeing garbage people changed to simply deplorables.
Blame the MAGA army for getting super upset about it.
So either you don't know what "deplorable" means, or what "dehumanize" means. It's one or the other.
Even with a “clean” record they still shouldn’t get their guns back. Ignoring all second amendment arguments just look at how they are holding their guns in the main picture. They are in no way trained or even given half assed knowledge in how to hold a fire arm.
So having your booger hook on the bang switch of your tiny-ass gun while you and your mayonnaise husband cosplay as Rihanna and Shy Ronnie isn't the right way to go about things, you're saying?
And you can HANG from it!
Seriously tho, man, the striped top and everything...ridiculousness.
Judge Joseph P. Whyte wrote in an order Wednesday that the purpose of an expungement is to give people who have rehabilitated themselves a second chance
Sounds like people should test that theory by having a protest in front of their house and see what they do.
Also:
City prosecutors and police opposed the expungements.
Oh my God, these people are so horrible they found a way to unite cops and BLM protesters.
me thinks they have the police department on speed dial and have worn thin their patience.
Iirc they're defense attorneys, the cops don't like them because of that.
Their records might be expunged, but their photos and what they did well never be.
No criminal record, sure, tarnished reputation amongst the left leaning side of the internet will remain
I'm sure they are quaking in their boots.
Rotten scum.
I feel like American gun control as it is now would actually be effective if the cops stopepd giving the white criminals their guns back, or in some cases actually take them away when the law says they should.
You can put whatever law you want on the books, but if the PDs aren't going to enforce it the way they haven't been enforcing what we already have, its not gonna do shit. They'll definitely enforce it on some types of people though.
Weirdly enough the police opposed the expungements here. These idiots have managed to unite everyone against them
Police just arrest and kill people, they aren't even required by law to protect people. Prosecutors and the judicial system enforce the law, or in this case, just ignore the laws for the well connected.
Ah, white privilege is sooo .. baldfaced / shameless.
I hope someone will rally in front of their home every weekend from now on. If I live in St Louis, I'd be there for sure.
"We had to defend ourselves. Antifa were coming to get us. We aren't some psychotic shitheads who think that guns make us powerful!"
Them guns is gone. Cops regular lose them once confiscated.
What an odd comment. Literally no one but that MAGA couple cares if they get their exact same guns returned, this is about having their privilege to own firearms restored after pointing guns at peaceful protestors.
The title is literally “they want their guns back”
People afraid of their own shadow because of how dark it is.
Wow GTA 6 looks lit.
this post was submitted on 07 Jun 2024
333 points (100.0% liked)
News
23167 readers
1885 users here now
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.
Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.
7. No duplicate posts.
If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners.
The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS