480
submitted 6 months ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world

President Joe Biden is taking fresh steps to help keep gas prices from climbing. For Republicans to see this as “disgusting” and “disgraceful” is bizarre.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] GiddyGap@lemm.ee 109 points 6 months ago

I actually just want permanently higher gas prices like in Europe to facilitate the move to EVs. The US needs to break the addiction to oil.

[-] stormesp@lemm.ee 39 points 6 months ago

A lot of people will be even poorer increasing the price of gas in Europe, most working class people cant switch to an EV just because,my family (myself included, but now i live in a big city where i dont need a car anymore) purchase usually 15+ year old cars, and there is no decent public transportation in that zone. I know you just want easy upvotes saying stupid things like that, but really, viewpoints like that are harmful towards the working class, if you want to facilitate the move towards EVs what you need is cheaper EVs, and tbh, fuck that bullshit and instead push toward better public transportation in rural areas instead of keeping the push in personal vehicles that are as wasteful.

[-] GiddyGap@lemm.ee 18 points 6 months ago

viewpoints like that are harmful towards the working class

News flash: The working class in most of Europe is doing much better than the working class in the US. And that's with much higher gas prices and higher taxes.

They also drive more EVs and have a heck of a lot higher quality public transportation.

[-] stormesp@lemm.ee 14 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Hm so if the median working class as a whole in the EU is doing better than the working class of the USA its okay the fuck the working class of the rural zones in spain which as i said lack public transportation or access to expensive EVs? Lmao.

[-] GiddyGap@lemm.ee 11 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

As someone who has lived in Europe for more than two decades, I can tell you that most rural zones in the EU do not lack public transportation. EVs become cheaper when it's the norm. Lmao

[-] stormesp@lemm.ee 14 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Just lol, seriously, have you seen the state in the rural zones of spain? Do you think a train or a bus every two hours is going to let people get a job outside their town with less than 10k habitants? Even in my hometown with 40k+ habitants only has a single (1!) train an hour.

Most people from a working class in spain having the minimum salary which is 1100€ (thats if you have a full time job in a country with 27+% unemployment among the young) while you are paying in most zones already 700€+ rent which is more than 50% of your salary (if you even have a salary). I can assure you that no one even with the minimum salary if they have a salary and paying a rent of 700+ is going to be able to get credit to buy a 10-15k plus EV. Not even 5-8+k to get a really cheap second hand one. So please, before you speak to this level of bullshit read a bit or look at data at least, your situation or the little you have seen does not represent the reality.

load more comments (11 replies)
[-] vividspecter@lemm.ee 8 points 6 months ago

Ideally, you tax the hell out of fossil fuels then redistribute it to the poor. The rich and middle class cut their usage and/or switch to EVs and the poor can get by while viable alternatives to driving are implemented and EV prices come down.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] SSUPII@sopuli.xyz 34 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

We are being devastated by the higher gas prices. People don't have the money nor the infrastructure is given to move to EV. Even if one does have money for EV, charging stations are extremely rare and you WILL find yourself stranded if you attempt any long drive unless you have a "old" combustion engine car or an hybrid both affected by the higher prices.

You don't want higher prices on gas with 0 attempt to actually make EV viable, trust me.

[-] Atelopus-zeteki@kbin.run 36 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

The "extreme" rarity you claim for charging stations is a myth, possibly propagated by the petrol industry. Plugshare offers accurate information regarding the location of charging stations (https://www.plugshare.com/). And the cool thing about that is there are both commercial and home/ office stations, with more coming online all the time. It's kinda good that EM bobbled the supercharger thing, so it encourages more groups to start providing chargers. The great thing about Plugshare and ABRP (abetterrouteplanner.com/) is that it makes it very easy to see and plan for your next charge. Tho' I do agree that the way to go is make the E-charging cheaper, not to make the petrol more expensive, yet.

[-] SSUPII@sopuli.xyz 11 points 6 months ago

Thanks for showing me where I live there is a singular small gas station within multiple kilometers with a couple EV charging stations 😂 I only find many if I go to a bigger city. In fact I do see them when I go to the city, and always empty.

E-charging is even more expensive then petrol here, so even hybrids that can charge people that own then never do so as going with just petrol is so much cheaper for how it lasts on the road.

[-] Madison420@lemmy.world 27 points 6 months ago

I hate to tell you most people aren't traveling more than 300 miles a day and most ev have ranges in excess of that.

Your trying to poke holes in Swiss cheese and claim it's less tasty because of it.

[-] Atelopus-zeteki@kbin.run 11 points 6 months ago

Like 99.9% will be less than 300/d. And one can charge at home, with a 120v or 240v cable. It takes longer than a DCFC, but functionally one arrives home, plugs in, and forgets about it till one needs to drive somewhere. Home charging is being about 1x/wk, for my family. And as much as I like my EV, I frequently remind myself that every hour driving is an hour that I'm not biking.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[-] intelisense@lemm.ee 22 points 6 months ago

What you are saying is that you should invest in infrastructure for electric cars instead of subsidising the oil industry again?

[-] IphtashuFitz@lemmy.world 19 points 6 months ago

Even if one does have money for EV, charging stations are extremely rare and you WILL find yourself stranded if you attempt any long drive unless you have a "old" combustion engine car or an hybrid both affected by the higher prices.

Bullshit. My wife and I did a two week road trip up/down 2/3 of the east coast in our Tesla last year, and not once did we have a problem charging. Half the hotels we stayed in had level 2 chargers that didn’t cost us anything to use, and Teslas SuperCharger network was perfectly reliable. We also found more than one parking garage with free chargers while parked.

Now that NACS has been adopted as the open SAE J3400 standard and most EV manufacturers have announced support for it, the rollout of more third party fast chargers should start ramping up soon. And with Tesla open up Superchargers to other EVs it’s getting easier and easier to charge.

[-] ares35@kbin.social 11 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

small town, middle of nowhere in the upper midwest. an hour away from basically anything other than walmart and a few fast food joints, and more than our fair share of climate change-denying maga morons.

we have multiple locations with chargers.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Player2@lemm.ee 15 points 6 months ago

Desperately hanging on to old things is not a long term solution. Petition your government to facilitate a decrease on the reliance of oil, not to help you keep it the same.

[-] SupraMario@lemmy.world 9 points 6 months ago

The tech is not there though. Most of the USA is rural. It needs to be heavily adopted in the large cities first before trying a one size fits all and rip off the bandaid approach.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Wiz@midwest.social 13 points 6 months ago

I guarantee most of the complainers drive around dumbass pickup trucks as their everyday vehicle, filling up at $250 every 2 weeks. I have problems feeling sorry for them.

[-] Atelopus-zeteki@kbin.run 10 points 6 months ago

LoL, our power company has a 'pilot program' for EV charging overnight, the price drops to $0.03/kW as a way of encouraging off peak charging. A decent sized EV battery has 77kWh. 77x 0.03 = $2.10 for a full charge. Just sayin'.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[-] timbuck2themoon@sh.itjust.works 20 points 6 months ago

The US needs better public transit everywhere, not just EVS.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] kava@lemmy.world 12 points 6 months ago

That is an inverse progressive tax. The lower income you are, the higher % of your income you pay.

It's essentially a tax on the poor trying to subsidize renewables. If the US had viable alternatives, maybe I'd support this. I don't think the poor need more taxes right now, though.

[-] pearable@lemmy.ml 12 points 6 months ago

The word you're looking for is regressive

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[-] Fedizen@lemmy.world 85 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

"How does this dying old man keep outsmarting us?"

-Republicans, constantly

[-] cranakis@reddthat.com 8 points 6 months ago

You're referring to Trump or Biden? It's unclear.

[-] todd_bonzalez@lemm.ee 11 points 6 months ago

Trump can't even outsmart himself.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Bassman1805@lemmy.world 82 points 6 months ago

"I did that" sticker people in shambles

[-] madeinthebackseat@lemmy.world 21 points 6 months ago

Don't forget about the recent pricing collusion reporting.

The higher prices were the result of collusion with OPEC by American oil producers.

Wouldn't surprise me at all if those decals were intentionally created by conservative groups in the know.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Snowpix@lemmy.ca 72 points 6 months ago

Republicans are outraged at anything Biden does. This isn't new.

[-] Crashumbc@lemmy.world 35 points 6 months ago

Yeah it started back in 2008 with Obama winning. GOP does nothing but oppose anything "libs" do.

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 18 points 6 months ago

Oh, it's way older than Obama. Republicans hated Clinton and Carter.

[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 9 points 6 months ago

They really, really, really lost it over Clinton for sure, because he had a wife that actually had ideas, and, even....spoke about those ideas. In public. They were horrified about this.

[-] negativenull@lemmy.world 14 points 6 months ago

It's been happening since Newt Gingrich. He created the playbook

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] InternetUser2012@midwest.social 10 points 6 months ago

They can't come up with anything helpful for people. They just take anything a democrat does and do the opposite. It's insane.

Democrats - Lets make peoples lives better: Republikkklowns - WHAAAAAAAT?!?!?!?!?! WOULD SOMEONE PLEASE THINK OF THE SHAREHOLDERS!!!!!!!

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] mercano@lemmy.world 68 points 6 months ago

It’s like when they refused to pass their own immigration bill because they’d rather campaign on the issue than fix the problem.

[-] cultsuperstar@lemmy.world 52 points 6 months ago

The same reason Republicans voted against their own immigration bill: Trump told them not to because he doesn't want to give that win to Biden. No wins for Biden, especially in an election year. Republicans continue holding us hostage so they can to put their fuhr back in office.

[-] todd_bonzalez@lemm.ee 50 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

For Republicans to see this as “disgusting” and “disgraceful” is bizarre.

What are you smoking MSNBC? Vocally opposing Democrats on literally everything, even when it doesn't make sense or contradicts party positions, is 100% on-brand for the Republican party.

Do some opposition research someday, goddamnit.

[-] Blackmist@feddit.uk 27 points 6 months ago

Remember when they did climb and republicans stuck little "I did that" stickers on the pumps?

Should be taxing the shit out of it anyway to snap the US from it's petrol addiction.

[-] Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 25 points 6 months ago

Is there even a hair of validity to the argument that Biden’s “environmental polices” are leading to increased gasoline prices? The US is literally producing more gasoline than it uses, and oil imports are taxed federally at about 2¢.

Seems like most of the squeeze is from petro states, oil cartels, and corporations that want to price gouge.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] negativenull@lemmy.world 21 points 6 months ago
[-] BigMacHole@lemm.ee 18 points 6 months ago

That's because Republicans care about the Working Class! Didn't Red States pass Laws preventing Heat Protections and Water Breaks?

[-] InternetUser2012@midwest.social 18 points 6 months ago

I pass a dipshits house that house many flags on it, and ha had signs in his front yard about how Biden is responsible for gas prices being so high for years now. He took the signs down. It makes me laugh.

[-] exothermic@lemmy.world 11 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Am i the only one who is outraged that the gas cap in this photo is not placed on its dedicated holder?

[-] nehal3m@sh.itjust.works 11 points 6 months ago

People actually use those? I mean, is the cap really so heavy that the little rubber cable won't hold it? I say dangle free, my man!

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] enbyecho@lemmy.world 10 points 6 months ago

Republicans enraged by Biden

There, FTFY

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Doxatek@mander.xyz 10 points 6 months ago

This is interesting. In my town there are stickers on the gas pumps of Joe Bidens face and they say "I did this". So I figured it was his fault /s

[-] frickineh@lemmy.world 9 points 6 months ago

Well yeah, that's usually their move in an election year. They're mad because they're not the ones doing it.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 27 May 2024
480 points (100.0% liked)

politics

19144 readers
2304 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS