134
ich🤦iel (lemmy.ml)
submitted 3 days ago by Muehe@lemmy.ml to c/ich_iel@feddit.org

Narre mich einmal Schande über dich, narre mich zweimal Schande über mich.

[-] Muehe@lemmy.ml 11 points 5 days ago

They could set up an account on one of the larger well established Canadian instances or even better start up their own.

Both of these options have their pros and cons, and I think it is important to explain these well to the council if you want to have any hope of convincing them.

A line of argument that has had some success in Europe is what has become known as "Digital Sovereignty", basically a fancy term for saying government should control its own infrastructure. So you might want to sell it as an easy way to have a permanent archive of public communication and a method for it that is under their direct control, rather than as a way to find more engagement.

As others have said self hosting has a maintenance and moderation overhead, but this can be lessened by running an instance together with other cities while still retaining most of the benefits of self hosting.

Seeing from the linked cross-post that this is about Port Alberni, and considering that http://portalberni.ca/ returns an empty reply while https://portalberni.ca/ lets me know I have been geoblocked because I'm outside of Canada and the US, I'd say you have an uphill battle before you though. These people made a website (probably paid for it, too), and then killed much of its use by geoblocking most of the world.

Good luck.

20
submitted 3 weeks ago by Muehe@lemmy.ml to c/solarpunk@slrpnk.net

Wasn't quite sure where to ask the question in the title, or if this is even the right question to ask, but figured a Solarpunk community would be most likely to have the answers I'm looking for...

My reasoning is we are facing some global problems here, you know with all the climate change and whatnot; So we need global solutions for them; Therefore the obvious solution seems to be the United Nations 2.0, or League of Nations 3.0 if you will. Basically a global constitutional assembly, hopefully before it all devolves into total war again this time, or worse.

So I want to read up on what thought or maybe even activism there is out there specifically in this regard. Anything to read, recent or historic, you can recommend?

Any thoughts you want to share? Why can or can't this work? Am I being to naive here? Explain it Like I am 5 please!

[-] Muehe@lemmy.ml 41 points 1 month ago

FYI you have a typo in your last screenshot (This sign m[a]y not...):

[-] Muehe@lemmy.ml 93 points 1 month ago

I don't know if there is any single takeaway here, this story is just fucking ridiculous on every single level.

  1. They bullshited themselves into a search warrant based on typical cannabis "investigation methods".
  2. In a state where recreational cannabis use is legal.
  3. Persisted in the search even after their main argument for it, high energy usage indicating a grow-op, fell away when it was clear it was indeed a medical facility.
  4. Made the motherfucking "Gun flies to MRI" TV trope a certified reality. This is a thing that verifiably happened now.
  5. Instead of getting help, used a sealed (!) emergency shutdown button...
  6. ...which damaged the machine. And released thousands of dollars worth of helium gas.
  7. Forgot their loaded magazine on the ground.

This can't be real. I'm fucking dying over here. Please let there be bodycam footage of the cop speaking in a high pitched voice after. (I know the helium was probably not released into the room, but one can hope I guess)

[-] Muehe@lemmy.ml 31 points 2 months ago

They never saw the message, they saw anon disconnecting, anon saw them disconnecting. Behind the scenes Blizzard made them shadow-ban each other, they will never share the same server shard again. Both sides think they won and Blizzard will continue taking money from both. /conspiracy

[-] Muehe@lemmy.ml 117 points 2 months ago

PSA for my fellow colour blind people, you can use inspect element option of your browser to add a filter: saturate(100); rule to the element for this kind of image:

389
submitted 3 months ago by Muehe@lemmy.ml to c/canvas@toast.ooo

If the canvas is doubled again to the bottom the LGBTQ flag will turn into a square. SCNR

[-] Muehe@lemmy.ml 44 points 3 months ago
[-] Muehe@lemmy.ml 27 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Well I'm no expert on Christianity, but apparently this theology graduate here agrees with you:

https://www.benjaminlcorey.com/could-american-evangelicals-spot-the-antichrist-heres-the-biblical-predictions/

1193
submitted 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) by Muehe@lemmy.ml to c/memes@lemmy.ml

Edit: Stickying some relevant "war reporting" from the comments to the post body, in a hopefully somewhat chronological order. Thanks for diving into the trenches everybody!

So the "and convicted felon" part of the screenshot that is highlighted was in the first sentence of the article about Donald Trump. After the jury verdict it was added and then removed again pretty much immediately several times over.

Then the article got editing restrictions and a warning about them (warning has been removed again):

During these restrictions there is a "RfC" (Request for Comments) thread held on the talk page of the article where anybody can voice their opinion on the matter:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Donald_Trump#RfC_on_use_of_%22convicted_felon%22_in_first_sentence

Money quote:

There's a weird argument for **slight support**. Specifically because if we don't include it in the first paragraph somewhere, either the first sentence or in a new second sentence, there are going to be edit wars for the next 2-6 years. Guninvalid (talk) 22:01, 31 May 2024 (UTC)

There is a second battlefield going on in the infobox on the side (this has also been removed again at this point in time):

The article can apparently only be edited by certain more trusted users at the moment, and warnings about editing "contentious" parts have been added to the article source:

To summarise, here is a map of the status quo on the ground roughly a day after the jury verdict:

15
submitted 5 months ago by Muehe@lemmy.ml to c/lemmy_support@lemmy.ml

So I have tried to search this community, Lemmy in general, and the GitHub issues on LemmyNet/lemmy repo, but didn't immediately see anything discussing this.

It would be really cool if Lemmy would trigger Firefox's new translation icon in the address bar based on the browser/OS/Lemmy language as compared to the post/comment language.

So i.e. if my browser/OS language is English and the post is flagged German or contains comments that are flagged as German, the Firefox address bar should show the little translation beta icon in the address bar, because Firefox can translate between these two languages.

Bonus points if it doesn't offer German translations if I'm logged in and have set German as one of my languages in the Lemmy settings.

(by the way the dialogue always adds "Undetermined" regardless of if it being selected in the settings or not, not sure if that's intended)

Hope you guys can figure it out. Right now the Firefox button doesn't seem to pop up regardless of which Lemmy instance I visit and which language is set where, but it does appear for a lot of other websites.

And while I'm here, thank you for all you do for us users and the Fediverse/ActivityPub in general. It's much appreciated! :)

520
submitted 6 months ago by Muehe@lemmy.ml to c/linuxmemes@lemmy.world

WINE_SIMULATE_WRITECOPY=1 %command% + Proton Experimental = working Battle.net

95
submitted 7 months ago by Muehe@lemmy.ml to c/lemmyshitpost@lemmy.world

Human dignity shall be inviolable. To respect and protect it shall be the duty of all state authority.

Article 1 section 1 of the Basic Law for the Federal Republic of Germany.

123
ich🛝iel (lemmy.ml)
submitted 7 months ago by Muehe@lemmy.ml to c/ich_iel@feddit.de
47
ich🔨iel (lemmy.ml)
submitted 7 months ago by Muehe@lemmy.ml to c/ich_iel@feddit.de

Kontext: https://youtu.be/IlaEvT_TVKs?t=5131

Kretschmer sagt Cannabis ist eine Einstiegsdroge zum Gipskartonplatten klein hämmern.

15
submitted 7 months ago by Muehe@lemmy.ml to c/cannabis@feddit.de

Neulandprobleme, kann man nichts machen.

Cannabisgesetz ist Tagesordnungspunkt 6.

362
submitted 7 months ago by Muehe@lemmy.ml to c/memes@lemmy.ml

Context:

Somebody made a post promoting the proprietary search engine they are working on, claiming in the post that it "would make Stallman smile". In a comment below the post they said that they made the statement about Stallman to "drive engagement". The post was later removed for promoting proprietary software.

Image description:

At the top is a screenshot from the modlog saying:

Removed Post We're building a search engine to compete with DuckDuckGo. No JS, no WASM, no spying. Just a statically generated results page.
reason: Comm rule 2: Don’t promote proprietary software

Below that is an image of Stallman smiling.

[-] Muehe@lemmy.ml 43 points 9 months ago

“leadership is a lateral move”

Ahahaha, what the fuck? This is simply perfect. Peak oxymoron. A work of art. *chef's kiss*

[-] Muehe@lemmy.ml 37 points 9 months ago

I heard the devs are planning a major nerf with the upcoming climate disaster patch by lowering the population and cooperation stats way down.

8
submitted 9 months ago by Muehe@lemmy.ml to c/deutschland@feddit.de

Zweistündiges Interview mit der neuen Präsidentin des BSI.

[-] Muehe@lemmy.ml 34 points 1 year ago

Basically in his role as chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff (a council of the different military branches) he called his Chinese counterpart during the election chaos to assure them Trump couldn't unilaterally declare war on China:

Woodward and Costa describe how Milley learned in October 2020 that the Chinese had become concerned that Trump would preemptively attack China because Trump was losing the 2020 election and his rhetoric against China was growing increasingly hostile.

Milley again called his Chinese counterpart on Jan. 8, 2021, two days after the attack on the U.S. Capitol, to again reassure him that the American government was stable and not an immediate threat to China.

Source

view more: next ›

Muehe

joined 1 year ago