290
submitted 11 months ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

Mississippi has long had high childhood immunization rates, but a federal judge has ordered the state to allow parents to opt out on religious grounds.

For more than 40 years, Mississippi had one of the strictest school vaccination requirements in the nation, and its high childhood immunization rates have been a source of pride. But in July, the state began excusing children from vaccination if their parents cited religious objections, after a federal judge sided with a “medical freedom” group.

Today, 2,100 Mississippi schoolchildren are officially exempt from vaccination on religious grounds. Five hundred more are exempt because their health precludes vaccination. Dr. Daniel P. Edney, the state health officer, warns that if the total number of exemptions climbs above 3,000, Mississippi will once again face the risk of deadly diseases that are now just a memory.

“For the last 40 years, our main goal has been to protect those children at highest risk of measles, mumps, rubella, polio,” Dr. Edney said in an interview, “and that’s those children that have chronic illnesses that make them more vulnerable.” He called the ruling “a very bitter pill for me to swallow.”

Mississippi is not an isolated case. Buoyed by their success at overturning coronavirus mandates, medical and religious freedom groups are taking aim at a new target: childhood school vaccine mandates, long considered the foundation of the nation’s defense against infectious disease.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] DarkGamer@kbin.social 103 points 11 months ago

Ah yes, that most cherished of freedoms, the freedom to let children die of easily preventable diseases

[-] girlfreddy@lemmy.ca 20 points 11 months ago

Up until now we've mostly seen diseases like measles and chicken pox but I'm expecting polio to show up soon ... then the shit will hit the fan.

sigh

[-] DarkGamer@kbin.social 17 points 11 months ago

It's a shame it's the children of the ones who fuck around who get to find out

[-] girlfreddy@lemmy.ca 6 points 11 months ago

Yeah.

My grandma was a nurse in the polio ward back in the day, and I had a friend (many many moons ago) who'd had polio.

[-] calypsopub@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago

Even more of a shame that other people's children are collateral damage

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] ASeriesOfPoorChoices@lemmy.world 12 points 11 months ago

Whooping cough is back. Yay.

[-] zcd@lemmy.ca 18 points 11 months ago
[-] BeautifulMind@lemmy.world 68 points 11 months ago

Can we just call these people pro-pestilence instead of dignifying them with names like 'medical freedom activist'?

I swear this sort of euphemism has become the obvious tell that they're up to no good and still demand respect for it

[-] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 16 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Up there with "Democratic People's Republic of Korea" as far as names that usually mean the opposite of what they're claiming, huh?

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 62 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

How many children are going to die because of these very likely 'pro-life' activists?

[-] Theharpyeagle@lemmy.world 22 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Yeah but how many will it save from vaccine death or, worse, autism? I mean surely the vast number of deaths related to childhood vaccinations in the past four decades will uphold their argument.

Edit: /s

[-] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 20 points 11 months ago

my dude desperately needs that /s

[-] Theharpyeagle@lemmy.world 7 points 11 months ago

Yeah that's on me. Oh well.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] HejMedDig@feddit.dk 9 points 11 months ago
[-] TheDoozer@lemmy.world 17 points 11 months ago

I read it as pretty heavy sarcasm, but there are people that dumb, so I may be wrong.

[-] Saganaki@lemmy.one 13 points 11 months ago

I believe this is sarcasm, but it is hard to tell…

[-] Rev3rze@feddit.nl 8 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

how many will it save from vaccine death or, worse, autism?

The number of people that are missing the obvious satire here is making me sad.

[-] diffcalculus@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago

Pretty sure this was sarcasm...

[-] ZeroCool@feddit.ch 60 points 11 months ago

‘Medical Freedom’ Activists

Plague rats. They're plague rats.

[-] MindSkipperBro12@lemmy.world 12 points 11 months ago

Can we just jail or shoot them or something?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] QuentinCallaghan@sopuli.xyz 38 points 11 months ago

When someone says "I'm not against all vaccines, just the ones for COVID", he is usually lying. In time this "skepticism" will slide into being against even the common vaccines and it can be seen now. My favorite blog Respectful Insolence had a good post about the so-called "medical freedom":

"Health freedom” and “medical freedom” have become a rallying cry for libertarians, far right wingers, and even outright fascists. Indeed, the Republican Party has become a bastion of antivaccine and anti-public health hostility, a process that actually predates the pandemic by at least several years. “Health freedom” and “medical freedom” have always been code words for dismantling public health infrastructure, anything resembling a vaccine mandate (even in schools), and dismantling the FDA.

[-] jayrhacker@kbin.social 10 points 11 months ago

Same strategy as "School Choice" or "Parent's Rights", the first was created to suck money out of the public school infrastructure and put an end to quality free public schooling, the second to basically make children property again.

[-] Zink@programming.dev 6 points 11 months ago

Yeah, many are against only COVID because it’s gotten all the attention. But whatever leaps in logic, conspiracy theories, and blog-eurekas have them being against the COVID vaccine will apply to all the others as well. There are people in my family who don’t get their flu shot for the same reasons as the COVID one.

[-] EmpathicVagrant@lemmy.world 27 points 11 months ago

We want the freedom to have our own day in medical practice performed on our bodies!

But also ban all abortion care and all HRT and send people to prison for disagreeing!

[-] BigMacHole@lemm.ee 24 points 11 months ago

Parents with autoimmune children will teach their children to take more precautions in life but with a stronger sense of love. Republican Parents will kill their children and their bloodline.

If Republicans are so hellbent on Killing Children let's at least look at the bright side and note it'll only last a generation or two.

[-] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 27 points 11 months ago

Bullshit, and this is the same fucked up defeatist logic people used to avoid a covid vaccine mandate.

Anti-vaxxers are not just hurting themselves, and they are not hurting themselves more than the rest of us, and they are not hurting themselves anywhere close to fast enough to kill themselves off. If you were right, this wouldn't be a problem at all. Anti-vaxxers don't die at a high enough rate to counter the spread of their stupidity. Covid, Pertussis, Measles, Mumps, Rubella, these diseases kill the sick, the elderly, the young, and the immunocompromised. The people who suffer most are the ones who would get vaccines if they could. It's dangerous to act like they are hurting themselves.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Rapidcreek@reddthat.com 23 points 11 months ago

We were real close to eradicating the measles virus worldwide. Then this stuff happened.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] theluddite@lemmy.ml 18 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Parahprasing greatly here, but in her recent book, Naomi Klein pointed out that most Americans are pilled as fuck on neoliberalism, and because the pandemic is a naturally occurring and obvious contradiction to its fundamental tenets (individualism, meritocracy, competiton, etc.), the only way to square that circle was to go insane.

I find that framework very useful. These so called activists are pilled as hell on this fundamentally individualist concept of freedom that inundates us Americans from birth. It's an almost entirely empty conception of freedom. Basically, we can say whatever we want while owning guns and generally being selfish. No one is entitled to be free of childhood disease though. That's not freedom because it encroaches on others being selfish. If you genuinely believe in individual liberty above all, as Americans are taught from birth, then childhood vaccinations are wrong.

Unfortunately it's a really fucking stupid way to run a society.

[-] Ooops@kbin.social 6 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

I think it's much more than that.

For example people also pretend the mode of transportation requiring licensing, regular checkups, a rigorous following of additional rules and the requirement to constantly display your identification is somehow the epitome of personal freedom.

So I'm pretty sure it's not just "going insane" as the reality contradicts their believe. There is also a fuck-ton of ~~brain-washing~~ lobbying/advertising involved to influence people to move into certain directions. The move to resist vaccination simply isn't natural in the US (it certainly wasn't in the past), unless for a very small group of people. Then is was coopted and inflated as just another front of a cultural war to divide and polarize people.

[-] Zink@programming.dev 5 points 11 months ago

That’s a sobering thought regarding the strict regulation of private transportation, and how much more access and discriminatory power it gives the police.

[-] fossilesque@mander.xyz 14 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

I was on one of the vaccine trials. Had a cab driver on the way back from one of my checkups go on a COVID rant. It was awkward after I told him why I was there. Lmao. I'd do it again, felt great being protected asap, plus money.

[-] uphillbothways@kbin.social 13 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

The first concept of vaccination was invented in 1796. It was an unknown idea before this. Which religion has an opinion on this and how exactly does that work when there was no concept of the thing in question when any of these religions were formed? It's such utter bullshit on its face. There's no grounds for this. It's made up crap on top of made up crap, as a grounds to shirk a simple procedure that saves lives.

But, also, this headline is dumb. Religious medical freedom advocates have been about this for ages. The only thing new is they got one dumb judge to make a bad ruling.

[-] glomag@kbin.social 9 points 11 months ago

I don't have any evidence for this but it seems like the vaccine pushback is at least partially a desire to avoid responsibility. If they choose to vaccinate and their kid is in the 0.000001% who experience adverse effects then it would be their fault the kid was hurt but if they don't vaccinate and their kid just happens to die of measles or whatever then it was all part of god's plan and they didn't do anything wrong.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Norgur@kbin.social 10 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Hey, fundamentalist smoothbrains, since "thinking" isn't something you all like to do all that often, let me translate your pseudo biblical gibberish into plain English:

"I'd rather have some young person who had to fight for their life already loose that fight than allow my healthy child to get a little pinch and feel kind of down for three days"

"I'd rather have another parent stand at the grave of their little joy than allow my child to have a little ouchie on an arm"

"I'd rather cite Christianity as the reason why I act in a way Jesus would have turned away in disgust from than be a Christian and care for the most defenseless, helpless in our society this one little bit"

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Wahots@pawb.social 9 points 11 months ago

God, I miss the 70s when everyone got their shots at school and anyone who ran out of line was called a pussy and was dragged back to get their shots so they didn't kill grandparents and babies.

When did we become so weak and scared? These idiots are gonna be the ones that bring back polio and measles.

[-] kite@lemmy.world 8 points 11 months ago

We may not see many repercussions from this now, but when the unvaccinated grow up and the viruses have had a generation's worth of time to spread - just wait till a pregnant woman gets mumps and has a profoundly deaf baby. Or their toddler gets polio and ends up spending potentially years in a hospital, only to be released with lifetime disabilities. I know 2 people with polio, and one who is deaf due their mother having mumps (pre-vaccine days). Their lives, and the lives of their families, was/is hard. I wonder what grandma and grampa, safely vaccinated, will say when their grandkids start falling ill.

[-] SuddenlyBlowGreen@lemmy.world 7 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

The people of "the party of pro-life", trying to spread plague.

You can't make this shit up.

[-] whatupwiththat@kbin.social 5 points 11 months ago

Awesome! Bringing back Polio to own the Libs...

[-] sagrotan@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago

There should be a mandatory vaccination against stupidity.

[-] negativeyoda@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago

I luckily (for many reasons) don't live in MS, but what if I don't want to subject my kid to a miasma of germs from these plague rats? Where's my freedom?

[-] surewhynotlem@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago

Not a new target for them

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 03 Dec 2023
290 points (100.0% liked)

News

23311 readers
3114 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS