360
submitted 11 months ago by yogthos@lemmy.ml to c/memes@lemmy.ml
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] marcuse1w@lemmy.ml 15 points 11 months ago

What do you hope comes after it ?

[-] yogthos@lemmy.ml 21 points 11 months ago

Socialist phase where means of production are owned by the workers, and then communism.

[-] trailing9@lemmy.ml 4 points 11 months ago

You can have cooperatives right now.

[-] yogthos@lemmy.ml 9 points 11 months ago

The problem there is getting the initial seed funding. Investors put money into companies because they want to have control over the company, and they can't do that with a cooperative. There is a systemic bias towards capitalist company structure because of that.

[-] trailing9@lemmy.ml 2 points 11 months ago

Investors want to make money above all. You can issue bonds with favorable interest rates as long as you have a solid business.

[-] yogthos@lemmy.ml 7 points 11 months ago

The reality clearly demonstrates that investors don't bother investing in coops. You've obviously never actually tried to get investors to invest in a coop.

[-] trailing9@lemmy.ml 1 points 11 months ago

No I haven't.

But I expect that the search for people who want to participate in an expanding cooperative is the bigger problem.

Do you know of a cooperative that wants to issue bonds?

[-] yogthos@lemmy.ml 6 points 11 months ago

I recommend learning a bit about the subject before arguing about it. Cooperatives don't issue bonds because nobody is going to buy these bonds.

[-] trailing9@lemmy.ml 2 points 11 months ago

Or cooperatives don't issue bonds because they believe that nobody will buy them.

It's the perfect investment for people who don't want to participate in the usual capitalism.

[-] yogthos@lemmy.ml 3 points 11 months ago

If you ever try starting a coop you'll find out how hard it is to get investment in practice. It's kind of hilarious that you think nobody thought of these obvious things to try before you.

load more comments (36 replies)
[-] Annoyed_Crabby@monyet.cc 16 points 11 months ago
[-] WYLD_STALLYNS@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 11 months ago

No, this is Patrick

[-] DocCrankenstein@lemm.ee 6 points 11 months ago

Anarchist government, preferably communist in nature but mutualist works too.

[-] nevial@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 11 months ago
[-] Mubelotix@jlai.lu 5 points 11 months ago

Deflation would actually make capitalism somewhat ok. It would stop people from buying useless shit and automatically reward the poor who can save a little but don't know how to invest. That's why I Bitcoin

[-] explodicle@local106.com 2 points 11 months ago

Bitcoin doesn't make it OK to get paid just for owning something, it's just less capitalist than dollars. Miner profits tend towards zero with difficulty adjustment, and Bitcoin doesn't pay to stake holders at all.

[-] Mubelotix@jlai.lu 3 points 11 months ago

How is this not ok to reward those who don't spend? If we are going to stop climate change we need to stop consuming shit as much as possible

[-] explodicle@local106.com 2 points 11 months ago

I think in this case the distinction between getting a reward and getting paid is important. Bitcoin just appreciates in value with the rest of the economy - you don't get paid a higher percentage of all bitcoins from saving them - like you do from staking, or holding dollar bonds.

My criticism here is against capitalism, not against Bitcoin. Bitcoin's best feature is that it minimizes profits, and inequality caused by the Cantillon effect.

[-] pewgar_seemsimandroid 1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

and Communism

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 15 Oct 2023
360 points (100.0% liked)

Memes

45198 readers
1829 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS