987
top 46 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works 103 points 1 week ago

This is well out of reach for most of us to replicate, but think about Jeff Bezos and Elon Musk... These dragons could change the entire world, yet they instead only seek personal gains and the disruption of positive progress.

Good for this guy and his family, though. He did what so many will never care to do.

[-] frank@sopuli.xyz 17 points 1 week ago

I mean, they are changing the entire world...

[-] UsernameIsTooLon@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago

Literally lmao. Hate Bezos all you want but the US can't live without Amazon now; it's another Walmart/Target now.

[-] cheers_queers@lemm.ee 11 points 1 week ago

i haven't ordered anything from Amazon for years. i think we would live.

[-] Evrala@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I'm not going to renew my Amazon sub when it expires. I say it's for moral reasons but honestly it's cause they've made the search so incredibly awful.

I'll search for things with the exact product name, still end up having to scroll down a ways to find it.

I'll go back to buying direct from manufacturer websites.

I got hooked on that no shipping and Amazon Video for a short while, but I haven't missed ordering from then in the last 8 or so months since I cancelled. As far as missing the video, yarr, avast ye hearties!

[-] Evrala@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

Thing with the video, I already get it from alternative means even while paying for it because Amazon doesn't like to play in full quality on Linux.

[-] coaxil@lemm.ee 6 points 1 week ago

What about the majority of the internet that runs on AWS things?

AWS definitely indispensable.

Amazon, I'd like to hear your case for "too big to fail".

[-] boonhet@lemm.ee 5 points 1 week ago

I base my statement on AWS outages always being news.

[-] skulblaka@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 week ago

Yeah but if it weren't an option we would adapt. Commerce would not grind to a sudden halt.

[-] fubbernuckin@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

And all it took was anticompeting anyone who could provide a better service.

[-] s3p5r@lemm.ee 1 points 1 week ago

It can, it just doesn't want to.

[-] ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world 16 points 1 week ago

Jeff Bezos and Elon Musk… These dragons

The only sense in which they're dragons is "dragon deez nuts across our faces".

[-] Duamerthrax@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

All the positive things they could be spending their money on that wouldn't put a chip in their wealth and the only charities any of them do keeps turning out to be ways to hide their money from the tax collectors.

[-] rsuri@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Let's not lump Jeff Bezos and Elon Musk together though. I feel weird defending Bezos, but he does have a big charitable fund that's quite transparent about how it spends its money. As for Elon, he's allegedly given billions to charity, but has never specified what that charity is and given his views on things it's probably appropriate to consider that highly suspect.

[-] Cosmonaut_Collin@lemmy.world 82 points 1 week ago

I wish more millionaires and billionaires would use their exorbitant wealth for community service. Clearly they can still be wealthy and make positive impacts in the world.

[-] The_Picard_Maneuver@lemmy.world 60 points 1 week ago

I have a hard time imagining not doing that if I were rich. The constant motivation to do something to help people would be so strong.

[-] Notyou@sopuli.xyz 35 points 1 week ago

That's what happened to Rockefeller and Carnegie. After, I think, Vanderbilt died Rockefeller and Carnegie got into a competition to see who can give away the most money. They donated buildings, money, and all sorts of stuff till they died. The thing is, they were making so much money through their businesses they ended up with more money when they died.

Of course this "change of heart" the 2 had was after decades of competing to be the richest man in the world. They accomplished this by not paying workers enough, and even making production more dangerous. The steel workers were being injured at a rate of 1 in 9. They should have been taxed properly to begin with and pay their workers better instead of calling pinkertons to shoot them when they striked.

The Pinkerton/steel workers were Carnegie. Rockefeller had his own problems, include running newspaper articles saying electricity is dangerous and burns down houses, so stick with Rockefeller kerostine lamps or other trusted oil products.

[-] Cadeillac@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

Electricity did burn down my house though

[-] Riven@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 1 week ago

Reminds me of how people were claiming, technically rightish, that seat belts injured a ton of people when they were first made legal way back when.

Like yea, injuries due to car crashes spiked a ton that first year but that's cause people stopped fucking dying in car crashes thanks to them.

[-] Notyou@sopuli.xyz 9 points 1 week ago

Exactly. Head injuries also went up in the military after the introduction of the metal helmets in WW1. Some extra critical thinking might tell you those head injuries would have been deaths of not for the helmets.

[-] bane_killgrind@slrpnk.net 3 points 1 week ago

Electricity doesn't kill people, misusing guns - I mean misusing electricity kills people

[-] Empricorn@feddit.nl 23 points 1 week ago

If we taxed them and closed loopholes, we wouldn't have to depend on them being generous on a whim and paying their fair share...

You’re absolutely right they need to be heavily taxed, but the government has plenty of money and they aren’t doing anything like this. So taxing the rich appropriately still wouldn’t lead to outcomes like this, which is what makes this guy special.

[-] SaharaMaleikuhm@feddit.org 15 points 1 week ago

We could easily make them do that.

[-] expatriado@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago

oh no, dont say the T word

[-] brbposting@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 week ago

I’d be a full on hedonist. Donate to causes in person for the smiles and the thanks.

Having my name on stuff - eh… not as important b/c I see how colloquial names are given and dedicator’s names[1] are ignored.

[1] Bay Area people: you ever hop on the Nimitz or Junipero Sera? More like the 880 or the 280. Or do you hear “John F. Kennedy Space Center” or just “Cape Canaveral” when rockets launch?

[-] hardcoreufo@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

I'd like to go around leaving big ass tips. 5 dollar coffee, here's a 1000 dollar tip.

[-] hardcoreufo@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

They all want to be remembered and worshiped for what they accomplished by seeing numbers go up in their bank account.

They are too egotistical to realize they would actually earn respect, adoration and have a legacy if they put their money towards helping the world be a better place. Instead they seem to think having a dick measuring contest via rocketships is a good way to help humanity.

[-] CitizenKong@lemmy.world 51 points 1 week ago

And this is why good people who got rich don't stay rich and people who do are usually selfish assholes. Elon Musk bought Twitter for 44 billion, he could have literally built hundreds of amusement parks for disabled people with the same money. Or do literally a thousand other things to make life for other people better. Instead he bought a toxic social media platform to make it even more toxic.

[-] EncryptKeeper@lemmy.world 19 points 1 week ago

Technically speaking he could have built 4,823 of these amusement parks and still be a billionaire after.

[-] Hugin@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago

He bought twitter because he was trying to do a pump and dump with the stock. Then the SEC said we warned you once you better be serious this time. He decided buying twitter for a massive premium was better then possible prison time.

He bought twitter because he was trying to do a pump and dump with the stock.

Maybe, but the fact of Saudi and Russian backing of his takeover and his turning twitting into (more of) a nazi propaganda shithole suggests that was the main purpose behind the acquisition - especially when the cost was an absolutely trivial fraction of his overall wealth.

[-] Hugin@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

That's why they loaned him the money. Most of his wealth is Tesla stock. He either needed loans or to sell a bunch of stock.

[-] Omnificer@lemmy.world 37 points 1 week ago

It's called Morgan's Wonderland. The father's company has also built a community center next to the park.

[-] Jode@midwest.social 18 points 1 week ago

I read "A Texas dad sold off his business..." and expected that to go in a different direction.

[-] Corno@lemm.ee 18 points 1 week ago

Talk about spending your money for a great cause, on top of being an amazing father!

[-] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 15 points 1 week ago

I saw a video clip of this place in a local news report somewhere. This guy's a badass.

[-] ThatWeirdGuy1001@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago

This just makes me think of south park where Cartman buys a theme park but with a more wholesome twist.

[-] brbposting@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 week ago

Yes slightly more wholesome

[-] Agent641@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

How special do my needs have to be?

[-] Intrama@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

That's beautiful of him. 💓

this post was submitted on 06 Sep 2024
987 points (100.0% liked)

Lemmy Be Wholesome

6564 readers
803 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Be Wholesome. This is the polar opposite of LemmeShitpost. Here you can post wholesome memes, palate cleanser and good vibes.

The home to heal your soul. No bleak-posting!

Rules:


1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means: -No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. No NSFW Content


-Content shouldn't be NSFW

-Refrain from posting triggering content, if the content might be triggering try putting it behind NSFW tags.


7. Content should be Wholesome, we accept cute cats, kittens, puppies, dogs and anything, everything that restores your faith in humanity!


Content that isn't wholesome will be removed.

...


8. Reposting of Reddit content is permitted, try to credit the OC.


-Please consider crediting the OC when reposting content. A name of the user or a link to the original post is sufficient.

...


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Lemmy Review

2.Mildly Infuriating

3.Lemmy Shitpost

4.No Stupid Questions

5.You Should Know

6.Jokes

7.Credible Defense

...

Reach out to LillianVS for inclusion on the sidebar.

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS