47
top 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] random72guy@lemmy.world 28 points 2 weeks ago

So basically, it's a poorly marketed $40 game facing a lot of free and popular competition.

[-] snooggums@midwest.social 21 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Did they market it at all?

All I have seen is the post mortem articles. Deadlock has had more marketing.

[-] Enkers@sh.itjust.works 8 points 2 weeks ago

Honestly, deadlock doing the whole Fight Club marketing strategy really paid off for them. I heard so much about "the game you weren't allowed to talk about" on various streams.

[-] Doombot1@lemmy.one 7 points 2 weeks ago

Not sure they did… I’ve never even heard of it before until just now

[-] MrScottyTay@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 weeks ago

They marketed it on their state of plays

[-] EncryptKeeper@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

I’ve been seeing ads for it for a long time, but the ads don’t even make it clear they’re for this game until 20+ seconds in, at which point I’ve stopped watching.

It’s very likely you too have seen plenty of marketing for this game but ignored it like I did.

[-] forgotaboutlaye@lemmy.world 20 points 2 weeks ago

Not really surprising given how it looked (like a generic ripoff), how it's priced (should be free), and how it was marketed (every conversation I enter starts with a chain of comments saying it's the first they've heard of it).

What is surprising to me is how much a Sony first party game missed the mark. I can't think of any other recent examples.

[-] Zahille7@lemmy.world 7 points 2 weeks ago

I had never even heard of the game until a couple weeks ago when I saw some articles posted here on Lemmy about it.

[-] SmileyBMM@feddit.nl 11 points 2 weeks ago

Hero shooters rely on appealing memorable designs, compare the characters in this game with any of it's competitors (TF2, Overwatch, Marvel Rivals) and it's obvious why it failed. That combined with questionable allocation of dev time (why put so much work into the planet info and story cutscenes?), poor map design, and a $40 asking price ensured it would flop.

[-] Ephera@lemmy.ml 6 points 2 weeks ago

I feel like there's just too much competition. They would've needed some hefty marketing budget to get across why people should play this instead of Overwatch et al.

[-] Mnemnosyne@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 weeks ago

First I even heard about this game was a comic talking about it's unattractive characters. I looked it up out of curiosity to see if this was an exaggeration like it has been with some characters like Aloy, and....ehhh...mostly true.

One of the big draws of these types of games is cool character designs people want to play. This game definitely doesn't have that for me. Overwatch quickly pulled me in with cool character designs, this one...does not.

this post was submitted on 01 Sep 2024
47 points (100.0% liked)

Games

16380 readers
861 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS