191
top 47 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] superkret@feddit.org 86 points 2 months ago

That's the correct decision. Last time NASA decided to send back astronauts on a known-damaged spacecraft, they all died.
Better to be safe.

[-] trolololol@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago
[-] zzz711@lemmy.ml 20 points 2 months ago

The space shuttle Columbia in 2003

[-] eestileib@sh.itjust.works 79 points 2 months ago

And the MBA vampires have bled another formerly great company to death.

[-] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 39 points 2 months ago

But think of all the shareholder value they created!

[-] burble@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 2 months ago

...and then destroyed. Too bad most of the vultures who gutted the company are long gone.

[-] The_Picard_Maneuver@lemmy.world 17 points 2 months ago

Yeah, the last thing you want to see enshittified is space flight.

[-] BearOfaTime@lemm.ee 3 points 2 months ago

Honestly the entire space industry has been a corrupt money grab from the start.

It's why Johnson even pushed a moon landing to Kennedy, to get pork for his constituents.

[-] Peppycito@sh.itjust.works 10 points 2 months ago

It was an inspired way to sell missile design to the public.

[-] originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com 48 points 2 months ago

thats it then, isnt it. boeing is kinda done with space[craft] for awhile.

[-] RootBeerGuy@discuss.tchncs.de 36 points 2 months ago

Probably for the best.

[-] burble@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 2 months ago

On the press conference call, Bill Nelson said he talked to the new Boeing CEO, who said they're committed to continuing with the program.

[-] superkret@feddit.org 26 points 2 months ago

I mean, what else is he gonna say, without tanking Boeing stock?

[-] grue@lemmy.world 8 points 2 months ago

Manned spacecraft, anyway. I will eat my hat if the next Starliner test flight isn't unmanned.

[-] CaptDust@sh.itjust.works 38 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

I feel so bad for these astronauts, I can't imagine being told I'd be stuck through the new year. and this puts the dragon crew half staffed for the work they needed to do. Boeing seriously fucked up here.

Glad they can come home on a safe craft, but there needs to be repercussions and answers.

[-] brown567@sh.itjust.works 20 points 2 months ago

I'd probably be upset to have my return delayed that much, but I'm sure there are people who would be ecstatic that their space trip got extended. Hopefully those astronauts are the latter XD

[-] threelonmusketeers@sh.itjust.works 20 points 2 months ago

Welp, that's that. I wonder how this will affect future flights. Will NASA require an extra test flight prior to Crew-1? If so, Boeing will be one rocket short, as all of the Atlas Vs have already been allocated.

[-] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 13 points 2 months ago

No way Starliner flies again. This whole thing has been a gigantic fiasco from day one. I hope they pull the plug and spend the money on programs with a future.

[-] Jumuta@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 months ago

boeing's spending the money not nasa, it's a fixed price contract

[-] trolololol@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

When has that ever happened?

[-] Jumuta@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

only for starliner as far as i know, every other boeing thing is cost plus

[-] trolololol@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

finally NASA making decent financial decisions

[-] Jumuta@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 months ago

they really dodged the bullet with this one

[-] trolololol@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

Yep, it only took 50 years of lessons with the same contractors to learn it am I right?

[-] Bangs42@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

Starliner and Crew Dragon both, if we're talking manned space capsules.

[-] Jumuta@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 months ago

crew dragon isn't Boeing is it

[-] threelonmusketeers@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 months ago

No, but it is fixed-price, which I think is what @Bangs42@lemmy.world was getting at.

[-] CaptDust@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 months ago

I disagree, they have so much time and money investment into starliner, it has to fly again. They can't throw out 15 years of development.

[-] SpacePirate@lemmy.ml 16 points 2 months ago

Sunk cost fallacy. Fuck Boeing, why should the government keep funding this?

[-] CaptDust@sh.itjust.works 8 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

It's not a usual cost-plus contract, to my knowledge, the government hasn't funded it beyond the initial half billion. Boeing is taking a bath on this capsule development, needs the crew contracts to recoup, and that's why I don't believe they will abandon it.

[-] ramchak@lemmy.ca 12 points 2 months ago

They definitely should throw away 15 years worth of development if they are unable to deliver. Any more money spent would be wasted

[-] superkret@feddit.org 8 points 2 months ago

15 years of development, and they didn't manage to build rubber seals that seal.

[-] burble@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 2 months ago

They're more than $1.5 billion in hole on this contract, but they must be doing some math on how many future contracts they might miss out on if they back out.

[-] BearOfaTime@lemm.ee 3 points 2 months ago

Don't throw good money after bad (or the sunk-cost fallacy).

Though it's not like all that development is lost. They retain all they've learned and developed. Just costs a bit to store the data.

[-] The_Picard_Maneuver@lemmy.world 16 points 2 months ago

I wonder if it's a nightmare or a dream come true for them.

I mean it's obviously terrifying, but they're astronauts in space for an extended period of time who will have a unique story to tell when they come home. If they write books about it, I'd be interested to read them.

[-] burble@lemmy.dbzer0.com 21 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Suni is now up to the 33rd most time spent in space and might climb up to 12th by the time this is all said and done.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_spaceflight_records#Most_time_in_space

It really sticks for the astronauts who will get kicked off of Crew 9, though.

[-] thesporkeffect@lemmy.world 9 points 2 months ago

It does, but I expect there is decent camaraderie among astronauts and they know who caused this.

[-] shirro@aussie.zone 4 points 2 months ago

Surviving the first and perhaps only crewed Starliner flight, getting a full ISS rotation and a flight home on Dragon feels like a bit of justice for crew who put their careers on hold for Boeing. The Starliner assignments got the short straw and hard to imagine other astronauts not being sympathetic.

[-] voluble@lemmy.world 15 points 2 months ago

The helium leaks on the RCS thrusters were a known problem before the Crew Flight Test, and Boeing gave assurances to NASA that the leaks wouldn't be problematic. What were those assurances based on? I don't know much about spaceflight, but it seems crazy to me that CFT was allowed to launch when there was a known issue that could impact docking and undocking with the ISS, and possibly deprive the capsule of a backup means of orienting for deorbit.

A person has to wonder - did Boeing's desire for a commercial success, at any point, impact their assessments of Starliner's safety? Is it possible that running this project at a set price was an impediment to proper, timely, and safe development?

[-] Jumuta@sh.itjust.works 10 points 2 months ago

nah the problem wasn't the helium leaks, it's overheating of the thrusters

[-] remer@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago

What are they doing about incompatibility issues between Boeing spacesuits and dragon capsules?

[-] astrsk@fedia.io 3 points 2 months ago

Probably why it’s going to take till Feb— they’ll adapt it and launch the adapted capsule to retrieve them.

[-] ByteJunk@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago

Nope, the February return flight is an expedition that was already planned long before this issue, the only change is that they're going to launch with 2 crew members instead of the usual four, so they can bring back the 2 stranded by Boeing.

NASA says they aren't considering any emergency missions, but it sounds that if they thought it was necessary they could ask spaceX for another launch.

Push comes to shove, they could fit everything into the spaceX capsule that's parked at the ISS, but they don't really want to go over 4 occupancy unless it's an emergency.

[-] astrsk@fedia.io 6 points 2 months ago

So they’ll send up 2 extra dragon suits for the stranded astronauts to use? I thought space suits are so highly customized and tailored to each astronaut that they can’t just do that.

[-] voluble@lemmy.world 13 points 2 months ago

At the press conference, NASA confirmed that there is a spare suit on the ISS that fits, and Dragon will bring up another one. Assessment was that this still presented risk, but less risk than the astronauts taking the Starliner back to earth.

[-] burble@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 2 months ago

They just need to get close enough. There's already one spare Dragon IVA suit on ISS that's a close enough fit to work. They'll send up another. During training, the crews actually use suits that were customized for other people while they wait for their new ones.

[-] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

To nobody's surprise.

this post was submitted on 24 Aug 2024
191 points (100.0% liked)

Spaceflight

621 readers
28 users here now

Your one-stop shop for spaceflight news and discussion.

All serious posts related to spaceflight are welcome! JAXA, ISRO, CNSA, Roscosmos, ULA, RocketLab, Firefly, Relativity, Blue Origin, etc. (Arca and Pythom, if you must).

Other related space communities:

Related meme community:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS