This is no fucking surprise - sexuality is a spectrum and it's rare to be at a full extreme of one of those. I'm glad this new generation will be less ashamed of themselves though!
I'm straight, 100%. I know because I've been very close to trying, and figured out I was too straight to go through with it. If you had asked me when I was 18-24, I would probably not be so sure. Being "bicurious" around that age seems to be quite common, but is probably (my speculation) not closely linked to the proportion of people who are actually not straight.
Well I was bicurious around that age and am now bisexual, so my anecdote nullifies yours
Well I'll bring the average to 66% but I'm not going to say which direction to mess up the math.
Your affinity for chaos betrays your bisexuality…
Just to further confuse the math, I was 100% sure I was straight at that age, but turns out I am aroace.
I thought I was ace at that age but it turns out it was just birth control messing with hormones. I'm sure I'm straight now.
With some rounding, we can get that up another 3% ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
Somebody who is sexually attracted to the same sex but doesn't to through with it is not 100% straight.
It's at least 15% gay.
In the last balance patch they buffed it to 18%
in the light of new hard evidence (very hard!) I have to update my priors to 23% gay
I had something similar and was mildly crestfallen when it turned out that dating a dude feels extremely similar to dating women. I thought it would be like... orange-flavored? Or at least spicier? Religions hyped it up for so long, I thought there'd be some sort of difference. Kinda just feels like dating a best friend, regardless of gender. :)
I still find women attractive, but I'll be damned if this relationship with my bf isn't the best one I've ever had.
awesome
I wonder what the survey questions were like? I mean, it's completely reasonable to find someone of the same sex attractive... There's a pic of Pierce Brosnan floating around the fediverse right now and that man is dapper AF. Doesn't mean I want to have his babies but he's sure as hell attractive. So if someone put a question on a survey that asked if you can find someone of the same sex attractive, would that qualify as "not fully straight"? Even if you have zero interest outside of that admiration of someone's physical appearance? I'd assume it would be impossible to be "fully straight" for most anyone if that were the criteria...
And water is wet. Next.
Water is what makes other stuff wet.
Water makes me wet
cue THAT scene from The Weight of Water
I remember a saying “every female is a few drinks away from a girl on girl encounter.”
That's just a male fantasy that they love to project onto all women and i'm so fucking sick of it. Just like the 'everyone loves boobs' garbage.
There's sometimes a performative aspect to it that isn't quite the same thing as attraction. Though I suppose it depends how "straightness" is being defined?
I think the cultural concept of straightness is just getting some of the starch taken out of it. There's more room for ambiguity in human behavior than a lot of people realize.
This is somehow evidence that society is falling apart. /s
That's interesting! I am curious to know what the scale was (what does it mean being fully straight?), if someone find the report and shares the link, that would be great. I looked for it but I could only find summaries.
Was this information collected also in previous surveys? Is there a trend we can observe?
Survey done by Durex. Durex was also that news site "ally of the year". Interesting. Usually whenever I think of polls I feel like people who aren't directly interested in the topic don't take the poll.
Like if you said there was a polls about video games, I might take it. But a poll about guns id probably pass on.
But I welcome a more open culture, so would be neat if true.
Yeah but I could only find past issues of the Global Sex Survey. I am specifically interested in the scale used for questions (and their results).
Maybe it will take some time for the report to be published though
The scale is likely the Kinsey scale. A 0-6 scale of sexuality. Zero is completely straight and six is completely gay.
Most people find themselves somewhere in the middle, even if they don't admit it.
I'm somewhere in the range of 1--1.5
I'm firmly attracted to the opposite gender, but might make an exception if the person had a personality that was super compatible with my own. But it's not something I'm going to seek out.
But do you think that in the survey they simply asked people where they "place" themselves on the scale, or they had questions that were used to infer the value? I am genuinely curious because I didn't know this scale before, and I honestly have no idea what it means being a 1 vs a 2, even after reading the scale, it's very abstract. So I am wondering what possible questions were in the survey. Unfortunately, I still did not find the full report.
Methodology would be nice to know, but I think the Kinsey scale is abstract for a reason. It's a tool to allow a person to broaden their own understanding of themselves.
And yet they show lesbians as a thumbnail/front picture. It’s obvious, that todays society clearly favours women’s bisexuality right out of sexual desires and (yes of course) the liberation of women. Bisexuality of Man are still beeing held back in society’s discourse, not just because it’s mainly without „general“ sexual desire by the ruling class which also reproduces its patriarchal world believes, but because todays feminism is all about empowering only women to fight against this and not empowering men to fight against the system that is also suppressing them. It’s true, that we need what current feminism is doing right now more then ever, but I want to live in a future where boys are also getting good grades in schools and have the same sexual freedom based on cultural expressions as women have, without being the only sex that lives less long and lies in war trenches.
Bisexuality of Man are still beeing held back in society’s discourse
Saying this while eating a big bowl of popcorn and watching Challengers
Most of the other half are lying to themselves.
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.
Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.
7. No duplicate posts.
If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners.
The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.