141
all 26 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] jmanes@lemmy.world 146 points 3 months ago

It is sad to think about how many working class people will funnel their earned money into his pockets.

[-] jeffw@lemmy.world 82 points 3 months ago
[-] kitnaht@lemmy.world 45 points 3 months ago

You know they are, but legitimately I'm pretty sure a large percentage of them actually have solvable/manageable mental illnesses. I'm starting to pity them more than anything now.

[-] stevedidwhat_infosec@infosec.pub 22 points 3 months ago

It can be hard for most to pity the spiteful and hateful.

Get what you give

[-] TipRing@lemmy.world 16 points 3 months ago

I'll reserve my pity for those more deserving.

[-] kitnaht@lemmy.world 18 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

My pity isn't just for them, but for the families destroyed by the rhetoric and the love lost between people.

People are so divided now on everything, everyone's caught up in trying to apply labels to themselves so they can be further divided into categories and discriminated against.

I'm really tired of the labels. Republican, Democrat, Right Wing, Left Wing, Fascist, Socialist, blah blah blah... these labels just help external influencers drive that wedge a little better.

Can't we all just be human and start to talk to one another? I think we'll find we have more in common than not. The only way to bring people over to your side is to befriend them, and slowly work on it. The fighting just causes everyone to dig their heels in so much more.

[-] Deceptichum@sh.itjust.works 17 points 3 months ago

What nonsense is this?

The labels aren’t just meaningless words, they represent the views of a person.

No one wants to just get along with the *phobe *ist who wants to strip away people’s basic human rights.

[-] oo1@kbin.social 5 points 3 months ago

you right they're not meaningless.
In the hands of the right demagogue they can be powerful tools for creating and extending stimgatisation and division - and undermining society and weakening the grown-up methods of resolving social stresses.

Daryl Davis arguably did try to get along with the kkk.
There might not be many like him and it might be a drop in the ocean, but at least it isn't no-one who wants to try to do the difficult thing.

[-] kitnaht@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

They are meaningless words, because the views of a person are far more nuanced than that. But by labeling yourself as something, people immediately get to start assuming what your views are before getting to hear them from you instead. That's the big problem with society today - everyone wants to be something unique, because we're all so connected now that nobody feels like they stand out. But by adding labels to yourself, you just paint a target on your back for people to aim for, because with that brand new label, people get to make assumptions more easily. You get to be divided off from the "rest" of society, and put in a special bucket and targeted.

[-] underwire212@lemm.ee 4 points 3 months ago

No one single word can represent someone’s entire world view. It’s simply not possible.

[-] billiam0202@lemmy.world 14 points 3 months ago

And yet, one single word can be enough to describe a person who is not worth wasting time on.

If you tell me women shouldn't be allowed to have abortions, I'm going to call you a misogynist and ignore you.

If you tell me that your god demands I act a certain way, I'm going to call you a zealot and ignore you.

If you tell me that eating horse paste is a cure for a fucking virus, I'm going to call you an antivaxxer and ignore you.

If you tell me Ukraine should surrender to Russia, I'm going to call you a Putin apologist and ignore you.

If you tell me trickle-down economics works, I'm going to call you a fool and ignore you.

If you tell me that mankind isn't causing the Earth to warm and that won't be bad for us, I'm going to call you a science denier and ignore you.

Hitler liked dogs, too. That doesn't excuse the rest of the evil shit he did or mean we should have a talk about the merits of Nazism. Likewise, Republicans are a willfully ignorant, evil party. I don't need to know how much of that party one disagrees with; the mere fact that one agrees with any of it means one should be ignored. I don't need to know their entire worldview; the GOP platform is egregious enough that agreeing with any of it makes Republicans terrible people.

[-] ricecake@sh.itjust.works 9 points 3 months ago

I don't want to befriend someone who thinks my other friends are child molesters and should actually die. I get the impulse to say we should seek friendship and common ground, and I do where possible, but I just can't with people who don't see people I care about as even being people.

And that's not a hypothetical, that's actual "I have talked with these people" decisions.

[-] Stardust@kbin.social 9 points 3 months ago

This is kind of blaming the victim: you think black or queer people did something other than existing to egg on hatred? True, some go out of their way to try to befriend KKK members and such, but that strategy has only makes a tiny dent on things. Once someone is pouring gasoline on your lawn in a cross, it's a bit too late to make friends.

[-] TipRing@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago

I'm happy to work with and listen to people capable of basic human compassion, but my patience for those who seek only to hurt the less fortunate and the marginalized has reached its limit.

[-] ShittyBeatlesFCPres@lemmy.world 9 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Don’t donate to politicians.

There’s refugee resettlement charities if you need people to help. Like, in Atlanta, New American Pathways helps families fleeing awful situations to get English classes. jobs, housing, enroll kids in school, etc. Lots of cities have similar charities. People who teach English at libraries and the like.

[-] bus_factor@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago

I read somewhere that traumatic brain injuries are correlated with voting Republican, but I don't know if there's any causation or in which direction it goes. A lot of Republicans might just have lives where they're more at risk of getting injured.

[-] WhatIsThePointAnyway@lemmy.world 57 points 3 months ago

How many of those are legit voters and how many are bots micro donating to mask Russian oligarch campaign financing?

[-] donuts@kbin.social 18 points 3 months ago

Who cares? Anybody who still supports Trump even knowing he's a wannabe dictator, convicted felon, serial rapist, and buddy of Epstein, need their fucking head checked. At this point I really hope these bozos give Trump all of their money. Knock yourselves out, dumb fucks.

[-] rhythmisaprancer@moist.catsweat.com 12 points 3 months ago

It could be a ddos but I'm guessing not...

[-] greentreerainfire@kbin.social 31 points 3 months ago

Dedicated Dummies Offering [their] Savings?

[-] adj16@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

Ahahaha, excellent

[-] CaptainSpaceman@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

Trump cant pay any bills, who's to say the site didnt get turned off because of that?

Or maybe it cant handle more than 3 concurrent users or something.

[-] hitmyspot@aussie.zone 9 points 3 months ago

Lol, tech competency was not his strong point. That's for Barron. He's good with the cyber.

He's probably more upset at losing money from rubes than the guilty verdict.

this post was submitted on 31 May 2024
141 points (100.0% liked)

politics

18852 readers
3782 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS