74

My 27 yr old sibling is a hard core follower of Joe Rogan 💩

What are some progressive channels/people/content that I could have my sibling start watching instead?

Preferably something that has a similar flavor - example: male host, muscular, easy to digest. I think that will make the transition easier.

My personal preferences are Seth Meyers and John Oliver, but Last Week Tonight (John Oliver) is even a heavy watch for me sometimes!

[No Andrew Hubbard. He’s another fake.]

Thank you!

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] theywilleatthestars@lemmy.world 52 points 4 months ago
[-] MxRemy@lemmy.one 6 points 4 months ago

Seconding this rec, seems like a good fit

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Mostly_Gristle@lemmy.world 5 points 4 months ago

In the same CoolZone Media vein, Hood Politics might fit the bill as well.

[-] Bell@lemmy.world 42 points 4 months ago

Preferably something that has a similar flavor - example: male host, muscular, easy to digest. I think that will make the transition easier.

You don't think much of your sibling do you?

[-] Carighan@lemmy.world 53 points 4 months ago

I mean if they listen to Joe Rogan, they don't seem to think much of themselves either tbh. That counts as self-harm.

[-] toothpaste_sandwich@feddit.nl 31 points 4 months ago
[-] victorz@lemmy.world 13 points 4 months ago

Their sibling might be young. Young people are gullible idiots.

[-] HackyHorse3000@lemmy.world 16 points 4 months ago

Their sibling is 27 in this case, I think well past the age of "gullible young".

[-] d00phy@lemmy.world 6 points 4 months ago

You’ll find that folks can be gullible at any age. My step-kids, who live with their dad in Texas, are in their early 20s and get about 99% of their information from either YouTube or TikTok. For the youngest, church plays a big part. Generally speaking, they are good kids, but they are both gullible AF. I’m betting OP’s sibling has a similar diet of media consumption.

[-] victorz@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago

Yeah, the unbiased style of debate/news reporting is very dangerous.

[-] hydrospanner@lemmy.world 5 points 4 months ago

Not to mention the entire premise of the post being, essentially, "I don't approve of the entertainment my sibling chooses to consume. Please make suggestions for me as to other entertainment that I can then use to regulate said adult sibling, removing their entertainment that I don't like and forcing them to consume something I find more acceptable."

Like...I think Rogan's whole thing is stupid and most I've talked to who like his stuff are similarly ridiculous...but to go from that to full out "I plan to take it away from them and force them to do something I find more acceptable" is really quite a leap.

[-] Mesophar@lemm.ee 6 points 4 months ago

Or maybe it's "I love my sibling and don't want to see them slip further into this conspiracy rabbit hole. How can I offer them similar content that isn't as harmful?"

[-] Octospider@lemmy.one 35 points 4 months ago

If he's a "hard follower" of Joe Rogan than he likely won't be interested in other content. Rogan is a fool, but that's why people find him appealing. Content that is insightful and educational is the opposite of the junk food of Rogan.

Maybe instead, when Rogan says something like "Bro did you know like the pineal gland of the chimpanzee produces anti-covid hormones? This is just what I've heard. Look it up. By the way did you see the tree growing in my toilet?" You can help your sibling by teaching them ways to think, reason, and critically evaluate the BS that freely flows from the Roganverse.

[-] LemmyKnowsBest@lemmy.world 12 points 4 months ago

Hey be careful when you are blatantly misquoting Joe Rogan to benefit your own exaggerations.

He clearly says that the pineal gland produces DMT. And you know how much Joe Rogan loves DMT.

[-] Grayox@lemmy.ml 17 points 4 months ago

The Hasan Abi Broadcast

[-] flamingo_pinyata@sopuli.xyz 17 points 4 months ago

Make him watch early Joe Rogan content. Back when he actually had an open mind and interesting guests.

[-] LifeLikeLady@lemmy.world 12 points 4 months ago

Before COVID Rogan's show was fantastic. As soon as the end of 2019 ramped up it was all down hill from there.

He went full Alex Jones.

[-] CluckN@lemmy.world 9 points 4 months ago

Yeah it’s easy to hate Joe Rogan now but there’s a reason why he was the #1 most downloaded podcast for years. Huge range of guests and Joe’s, “Jack of all trades master of absolutely nothing besides MMA” knowledge base of questions got some good stories out of people.

[-] KombatWombat@lemmy.world 8 points 4 months ago

I think you'll be hard pressed to find someone progressive enough for lemmy to like that will also be interesting to a Joe Rogan fan. I would recommend Destiny though. I wouldn't say he's like Joe Rogan, but he frequently does debates with commentators of all politcal positions including those with similar beliefs to Joe. He has an aggressive, confrontational style that would be your best bet at trying to demonstrate the weaknesses of the views Joe would advocate for.

If you're not familiar with his views, Destiny could probably be described as a left-leaning liberal institutionalist moderate. His community can attract a variety of viewpoints and is relatively accepting of criticism for Destiny so your brother would have an easier time interacting with them than someone like Hasan.

It's nice you are trying to look out for your brother like this. Good luck!

[-] Woozythebear@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago

You recommended a right wing pedophile... he said left wing content not borderline nazi propaganda

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] TwoBeeSan@lemmy.world 6 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

This comes off a little negative but totally get the desire to show a sibling something different,as someone who uses to listen to rogan regularly...

Find whatever guests he liked and nail down what it is he's actually interested in. For me it was history and comedy.

History of Rome with Mike Duncan then lead to youtubers like sandrhomanhistory and the operations room. If he's into more military and masculine show him forgotten weapons also on YouTube.

If you go as left mainstream as John Oliver it's gonna be an uphill battle. Even though I more than likely agree with what he would say have 0 desire to watch it.

Comedy wise the early cumtown episodes are goofy classics.

[-] vzq 3 points 4 months ago

What I love about Mike Duncan is that you can hear him radicalizing in real time during the Revolutions podcast. By the time he reached the Haitian Revolution he’s done with everyone’s shit.

[-] howrar@lemmy.ca 5 points 4 months ago

Would Lex Fridman fit the bill? He runs in the same circle as Joe Rogan with similar guests, but generally just let's his guests speak instead of actively pushing nonsense, and especially not with the degree of confidence that Rogan does while being wrong. It'll still require you to listen critically, but that might be easier if you don't have someone actively pushing you in one direction.

[-] DarthYoshiBoy@kbin.social 4 points 4 months ago

I've never listened to Rogan*, but I think https://www.theskepticsguide.org/podcasts does an excellent job of talking about current news and science items in an easily digestible format that mostly avoids bullshit while probably filling the same gee-whiz niche that people expect from Rogan? It's a panel, so not a single muscular male host, but I think if your sibling is pursuing Rogan because they think it's helping expose them to new interesting ideas, SGU is a vastly superior route to that end.


*I actually think my only Rogan exposure has been the SGU talking about how he more or less just believes the last thing anyone told him, whatever that might be, which seems... less good?

[-] doofy77@aussie.zone 5 points 4 months ago

Your preference is your preference, but SG1 and SGA are far better than SGU in my opinion.

[-] DarthYoshiBoy@kbin.social 3 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

I assume this is a Stargate thing and that there aren't actually that many Skeptical Guide podcasts out there.

I haven't got any dog in the Stargate fight, I've seen the original movie (good) and watched the Richard Dean Anderson TV series (better than the movie) for a while before it just fell off my radar? I'll take your word for it that Stargate Universe is the lesser of the Stargate properties.

SGU in my comment obviously is referring to the Skeptics Guide to the Universe aka, the linked podcast.

[-] gst0ck@lemm.ee 3 points 4 months ago
[-] snack_pack_rodriguez@lemmy.ca 3 points 4 months ago

Beau of the fifth column on YouTube is just for this he tries to reach people at that level and doesn't talk down to them and is great on foreign policy concepts.

[-] unknowing8343@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Funny that you want a muscular male host, 😅

Currently my most favourite podcast is Andrew Huberman's, which would probably fit the muscular male criteria.

It's also very progressive in the sense that it is basically about science-based protocols to become a healthier human being both physically and mentally.

I strongly recommend listening on YouTube with sponsorblock if possible.

So far, the only truly bad episode was the one with Zuckerberg (that I have found) because, you know, there is really not much to learn from him, specially considering the topics of the podcast.

Oh, I just saw your comment about him, 😅, always interested in seeing evidence on his fakeness.

[-] BonesOfTheMoon@lemmy.world 7 points 4 months ago

Huberman just got outed as a big time aerial cheater and quasi bogus scientist just FYI. https://nymag.com/intelligencer/article/andrew-huberman-podcast-stanford-joe-rogan.html

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] moon@lemmy.ml 7 points 4 months ago

Huberman has been a guest on Rogan's podcast and seems to be in the same circles with overlapping guests and ideas. He also peddles pseudoscience and random supplements, so I'm not sure this helps OP's sibling escape the misinformation sphere.

There's also a pretty alarming piece in NY magazine (paywalled) that goes into how much he lies in his personal life to build a narrative that seems to align with the agenda he pushes on his show.

[-] unknowing8343@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 4 months ago

So now everyone that has been on Joe Rogan is a right wing fascist? Cause I couldn't imagine Neil deGrasse Tysson like that.

In terms of the pseudoscience and supplements... It clearly shows people don't watch his stuff. I am SURE it's not perfect, but most of it is clearly WELL referenced on the show description, and anything that hasn't been officially approved he states that clearly with CONSTANT warnings to PLEASE CONSULT A PROFESSIONAL.

I hate Joe Rogan. I hate fascist propaganda. Yes, Huberman makes money with his podcast, all podcasts are business, all big ones, at least.

All the claims about his personal life seem to me like journalists trying to come up with vector attacks to a famous figure for clicks, just like it happens with any other celebrity.

Yeah, he may be a terrible boyfriend, but Einstein married his cousin and Oppenheimer was a cheater and we live in this amazing (or horrible) world thanks to them.

[-] moon@lemmy.ml 4 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

First, he's not in the right wing Rogan group but he's definitely in the grifter circle that preys on insecure young men.

Lol this guy is not Albert Einstein. He spends too much time podcasting and being an influencer for that to ever be the case. The best case you can make for him is as a scientific communicator, but he has been frequently shown to spread shoddy science and pseudoscientific claims about things like sunscreen damaging the brain.

His personal life is very relevant here because it shows he's a pathological liar:

  1. He had a primary partner who was in a serious relationship with him and on IVF so they could have a baby, but he was cheating on her with FIVE other women
  2. These women all believed they were in an exclusive relationship with him and he spun an astounding web of lies to maintain these relationships
  3. He exposed all of these women to a form of HPV that can cause cancer for women, without telling them that he was a carrier or that he was having unprotected sex with all of these other people (is this the kind of health advisor you want?)

The reason why these 3 points matter are that they show a shocking pattern of deceit. The man was lying like it was oxygen to him, just so he could maintain six ostensibly monogamous relationships. He's also a danger to public health, yet giving millions health advice every week.

He has claimed to have been a bad kid who was locked up in an institution with conditions so bad that kids around him were dying/taking their own lives. That was entirely fabricated. He has more hard-luck stories about how his life was rough as a kid, but he found some hidden truth and became an academic and professional success. But the NY Mag article demonstrates he had a very privileged upbringing and neither his parents nor the kids who grew up with him know what he's talking about. He's obviously an upper-middle class guy selling a rags-to-riches story to his followers. It's classic grifter stuff. "I used to be troubled and unsuccessful, until I found this thing. You can be like me if you do whatever I tell you and buy whatever I'm selling."

This man lies in public about his upbringing to convince people of a narrative about his success. He lies in private to all of these people who care about him. That should concern his daily listeners and fans. If he's lying this much, why wouldn't he lie to you? This isn't a case of a few minor embellishment and a mistress either, this is disturbing shit he's doing because it suits him. Someone like that should not be the trusted advisor of millions about anything, let alone how to be healthy and successful.

load more comments (8 replies)
[-] gastationsushi@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago

J Aubrey is a very entertaining long format YTer that explains many of the internet's worst villains. His take down of grifters don't target Joe himself, but help inoculate people from the "natural" hierarchies that dominate conservative thought.

https://m.youtube.com/@jaubrey/videos

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] NewWorldOverHere@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago

Edit: Going through all the suggestions now - thank you! I hadn’t heard of these before. I appreciate it!

[-] pb42184@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago

Modern Wisdom

[-] Tartas1995@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 4 months ago

I read it here before but the best way is deconstructing a specific case of the person in question choosing. The problem is that replacing one influencer with another one won't change the understanding issue of misplaced trust in media/people.

I think that these things should be voluntary by the way. Both for success chances and pure respect for your sibling.

Ask him if they would be interested. Then make them choose an episode. Prepare yourself. Ask them to prepare a little document in which they express their understanding and lesson that they learned from the episode. Ask them if they are willing to investigate how true these things are. Look for evidence together or alone. When done, get together and talk about the truthfulness of the ideas.

Alternatively ask yourself if they have some kind of expertise in something and look if there is a Joe Rogan episode about and suggest them to watch it. The deconstruction would happen automatically. You can help by ask them questions about it. Having to vocalize criticism towards something is an amazing reflection exercise.

[-] mydude@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Preferably something that has a similar flavor - example: male host, muscular, easy to digest. I think that will make the transition easier

Tell me you think your brother is superficial without saying you think he is superficial...

[-] NewWorldOverHere@lemmy.world 8 points 4 months ago

Agreed, my sibling is superficial. They see muscular males as authority figures (for learned reasons I won’t get into) which is a problem when Rogan (+guests) is spouting nonsense.

That’s why I’m trying to find similar content that they’ll enjoy, and help break old habits. They are capable of growth and improvement.

[-] jimmy90@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago
[-] gastationsushi@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago

The same Destiny that has alienated his personal relationships with everyone who's ever cared about him?

The same Destiny threw a debate with shithead Ben Shapiro because he wanted to get invited back?

At least Joe Rogan believes the shit he shovels, Destiny is a pure grifter searching for more and more fame.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 09 May 2024
74 points (100.0% liked)

Asklemmy

43424 readers
1255 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS