386
submitted 5 months ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

People are a little bit stingier in barber chairs and Ubers than they were just a few years ago.

The shares of adults who say they always tip their hair stylists, servers at sit-down restaurants and food delivery people have each fallen 8 percentage points since 2021, according to a Bankrate survey released Wednesday. That rate slipped 7 percentage points for taxi and ride-hail drivers over the same period.

Three years ago, the economy was reopening from the pandemic and inflation was higher than it is now, but so was concern for front-line workers.

At the time, three-quarters of consumers reported always tipping restaurant servers, but today just two-thirds do. Despite modest upticks since last year, barely more than half of people now count themselves reliable tippers of hairdressers (55%) and food delivery drivers (51%), while only 41% say the same when it comes to ordering a ride.

The survey reflects Americans’ growing ease bypassing ubiquitous tipping prompts, from coffeeshops to airport terminals in the post-Covid economy, especially as sticker prices have risen. While consumer spending has held remarkably steady, many households are feeling the squeeze from persistent inflation and tightening their belts accordingly. Some of that newfound caution may be factoring into when, where and how much people tip.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] skuzz@discuss.tchncs.de 131 points 5 months ago

Gotta love corpo news.

have made some people stingier

They’re no longer appreciating service industry workers

Shut the fuck up and pay them a living wage you animals. Don't try and continue pitting individuals against each other. "Blame the consumer for everything" is so played out at this point.

[-] EatATaco@lemm.ee 2 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

The reality is that many of these jobs rely on tips. If they were to "pay them a living wage" then the cost of the service would just go up.

Don't get me wrong, I want tipping to go away, and it's gotten absurd where people are asking for tips now. But it's absolutely stingy to not tip in these places where traditionally they would be tipped. If you don't want to tip, don't buy their services. It should be a recognized part of the cost: you just think it should be made official, some think it should be based on the quality of service they received.

[-] Bertuccio@lemmy.world 20 points 5 months ago

The cost would not increase. That is not how supply and demand works.

It is extremely unlikely this has not been explained to you before.

[-] EatATaco@lemm.ee 2 points 5 months ago
[-] Bertuccio@lemmy.world 7 points 5 months ago

Your response is to cite an article proving my point and not understand that?

[-] EatATaco@lemm.ee 1 points 5 months ago

My article certainly does not prove your point. It shows that when companies replaced tipping with high wages, they had to raise the cost of their goods/services. Which is exactly what I said.

[-] Bertuccio@lemmy.world 6 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

No. It says when they raised their prices according to something other than supply and demand people stopped buying from them.

Because prices are controlled by supply and demand. Not costs.

The fact that they also don't understand that doesn't mean you do.

[-] brygphilomena@lemmy.world 7 points 5 months ago

When entrees are all up in the 30s versus in the 20s, it doesn’t matter if [customers] know that you are gratuity-inclusive.

I tip 10-15%, how are prices so much higher that then jump into the 30s for a meal? Most of my meals our, tip included, don't hit the $30 threshold. I think that their prices, even accounting for tips included, were off.

“I think a lot of people don’t see the system as being broken, or anything. And a lot of people love tipping,” he observed. “They feel some kind of power.”

He thinks people like tipping because they have power? That's kind of fucked.

They spend a bunch of time saying that the locations they included tips in payed $5-6 less per hour. How can they even say they ran a location with tips included if they didn't even match the tipped wages? They overcharged for food and still didn't pay the staff enough. I'd say that's a lot of mismanagement rather than a failure of a no-tipping restaurant.

Here's another core concept that places don't seem to understand, if your business cannot make it without underpaying staff then you shouldn't be in business. Someone else who can manage it will fill your gap in the market or the market will correct itself.

[-] Liz@midwest.social 17 points 5 months ago

The cost of the service includes the tip if a tip is expected. The cost would stay the same if you stopped tipping and the establishment raised sticker prices to compensate.

[-] EatATaco@lemm.ee 1 points 5 months ago

If you count the tip as "part of the service" yes I agree that the price would stay the same. But the way I'm saying it is that there is the charge for service/goods, and then there is the tip. If we get rid of tipping, in favor of high wages, the service charge goes up.

[-] Blackmist@feddit.uk 11 points 5 months ago

Good. The cost should go up, because that's what it costs the business to run if they pay an actual living wage.

this post was submitted on 07 Jun 2024
386 points (100.0% liked)

News

23320 readers
3691 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS