374
submitted 6 months ago by breetai@lemmy.world to c/world@lemmy.world

I don’t blame them. Ukraine needs to take the war to Russia to win.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] robocall@lemmy.world 175 points 6 months ago

As an American, I support Ukraine droning inside Russia. Fuck up their power plants, oil production, and bases! I believe most Americans would agree that in war, this tactic is fair game.

[-] rockSlayer@lemmy.world 31 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Power plants are not valid military targets though. No one should be attacking those and it's always wrong to do so.

Edit: I posted this comment and immediately went to bed. After waking up and looking at responses, I'm absolutely disgusted with people justifying and approving war crimes. Attacking civilian infrastructure like power plants is a WAR CRIME and that's why it's a huge deal that Russia has been attacking power plants. An eye for an eye makes the whole world blind.

Edit 2: alright, time for links since people seem unconvinced. Both the ICC and the UN consider the attacks by Russia on Ukrainian civilian infrastructure to be war crimes. If it's wrong for Russia to do, it's wrong for everyone to do.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 53 points 6 months ago

Sorry, Russia already lost the right to say Ukraine shouldn't be hitting their power plants.

[-] rockSlayer@lemmy.world 13 points 6 months ago

An eye for an eye makes the whole world blind. If Russia started using VX gas, would it be acceptable for Ukraine to start using Sarin? Absolutely fucking not. There is never a legitimate excuse for a war crime.

[-] CosmicCleric@lemmy.world 7 points 6 months ago

There is never a legitimate excuse for a war crime.

There's one actually. Survival.

If the situation gets to a point where your existence on the planet becomes problematic, you take the gloves off, you fight back with everything you can, especially if you're protecting those that you love.

Having said that, fuck war, and fuck war crimes. Wish the UN could resolve this crap before it gets to where we are now.

[-] jubilationtcornpone@sh.itjust.works 34 points 6 months ago

~~Power plants are~~ Ukraine is not a valid military target though. No one should be attacking ~~those~~ it and it's always wrong to do so.

FTFY

[-] rockSlayer@lemmy.world 7 points 6 months ago

Well yes, but starting a war suddenly and without declaration isn't a war crime.

[-] jubilationtcornpone@sh.itjust.works 11 points 6 months ago

~~Well yes, but~~ starting a war ~~suddenly and without declaration isn't~~ is a ~~war~~ crime.

FTFY as well.

[-] rockSlayer@lemmy.world 8 points 6 months ago

Look, I'm about as anti-war as they come. But in the capitalist neoliberal rules-based order, war happens constantly all over the world and the best we can do is enforce the provisions of the Geneva Convention. No good will come from equating war generally with war crimes right now. There will be a point where we can call war a crime against humanity, but the Overton window isn't there yet.

[-] fuckingkangaroos@lemm.ee 1 points 6 months ago

Why are you framing it as if capitalism and neoliberalism are causing war? Isn't this one of the most peaceful times in human history?

[-] rockSlayer@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago

It's not that they're the cause of all war, but neoliberal capitalism is the root of all modern conflicts.

[-] Crampon@lemmy.world 31 points 6 months ago

Maybe. But destroying the Russian dictatorship is a moral obligation for everyone in the free world.

All Russian infrastructure and assets are valid targets. Both inside and outside of Russia.

[-] rockSlayer@lemmy.world 8 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Attacking civilian infrastructure like power plants is a WAR CRIME and that's why it's a huge deal that Russia has been attacking power plants. An eye for an eye makes the whole world blind. All moral obligations are equal. That means doing unethical and immoral actions in pursuit of an ethical and moral goal means you are no longer fighting a good fight.

[-] PersnickityPenguin@lemm.ee 5 points 6 months ago
[-] rockSlayer@lemmy.world 5 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Claiming that they're typically valid targets is very different from "sometimes they are, in extreme circumstances".

[-] Buffalox@lemmy.world 28 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Power plants are not valid military targets though.

Yes apples are not oranges, so why are you trying to change the subject?
AFAIK there is not a single example of Ukraine attacking power plants in Russia.
An oil depot or refinery is NOT a powerplant. Russia has more than enough oil to serve their population, but maybe they can't serve the military 100% too, if Russia chooses to prioritize their illegal military invasion over their own population, that's a Russian problem. As long as Russia prioritize oil for their military, oil is a valid military target.

[-] rockSlayer@lemmy.world 9 points 6 months ago

I'm not trying to change the subject. The OP tried to slip a war crime target in with valid military targets, and I wanted to set the record straight.

[-] jubilationtcornpone@sh.itjust.works 17 points 6 months ago

Buddy, I can smell the straw from here. Ukraine isn't attacking Russia's critical infrastructure out of some need for retribution. If a grizzly bear attacks you, you hit that thing in any sensitive spot you can reach until it backs off. Otherwise you're dead. That's the situation Ukraine has been in from the start. They've been persistently outgunned and outmanned. The only way to get Russia to stop is to hit them where it hurts.

[-] rockSlayer@lemmy.world 8 points 6 months ago

I'm not making some kind of strawman argument. I'm correcting the OP, because attacking civilian infrastructure is a war crime. If Russia starts using chemical weapons, should Ukraine start too? If you have any sense of ethics, you'd say no.

Congratulations, you've successfully justified a war crime.

[-] PersnickityPenguin@lemm.ee 15 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Citation needed

Civilian infrastructure can in fact a valid target if it assist the military. Electricity generation is used to maintain many military systems, including telecommunications, logistics, lighting, radar systems, and all sorts of manufacturing capability that assists the military.

[-] rockSlayer@lemmy.world 7 points 6 months ago

So fucking what? Attacking civilian power infrastructure isn't the solution to fighting an enemy. Attack the military comms, logistics, lighting, radar, and manufacturing instead. Then everyone knows the attack is absolutely justified.

[-] Hubi@feddit.de 13 points 6 months ago

At least Ukraine is not doing it in the middle of winter, unlike Russia.

[-] Coreidan@lemmy.world 11 points 6 months ago

Power plants are not valid military targets though

Sure they are. You’d make a terrible military leader.

[-] rockSlayer@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago

You’d make a terrible military leader.

And you'd end up in the Hague.

[-] hswolf@lemmy.world 11 points 6 months ago

It's morally wrong to do so. At the end of the day, like every single other war in the human history sadly , the right side is the winning one, be It bombing power plants, hospitals or houses.

[-] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 8 points 6 months ago

There have been no such calls for Ukraine to stop attacking Russia. The article is behind a paywall, and there are no corroborating stories from any credible news sites. According to the same article on yahoo news, the White House claimed its due to oil prices. The US gets its oil from Canada, Mexico, Saudi Arabia, Iraq, and Brazil. The headline has no merit.

this post was submitted on 20 Apr 2024
374 points (100.0% liked)

World News

38978 readers
2350 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS