43
submitted 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) by MTK@lemmy.world to c/selfhosted@lemmy.world

I have a home server and I have some HTTP services running on it. I'm thinking if I should even bother with HTTPS, as I'm already using tail scale which should be peer-to-peer and encrypted. So I shouldn't worry about any men in the middle.

Am I missing something?

It just feels wrong to work with non-S HTTP :(

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] MTK@lemmy.world 5 points 9 months ago

It does though doesn't it? since every device needs to be authorized by me first

[-] damium@programming.dev 13 points 9 months ago

It can still have issues with potential attacks that would redirect your client to a system outside of the VPN. It would prevent MitM but not complete replacement.

[-] lambda@programming.dev 1 points 9 months ago

Yep! It all comes down to your attack surface and how paranoid you want to be.

this post was submitted on 05 Feb 2024
43 points (100.0% liked)

Selfhosted

40006 readers
563 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS