221
submitted 11 months ago by ZeroCool@feddit.ch to c/news@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] bedrooms@kbin.social 78 points 11 months ago

As a non-US citizen I'd like to reiterate that you can get rid of this idiocy only by banning guns.

Not interested in American opinion regrading this one, sorry, it's a super simple fact with no discussion worth wasting time for us.

[-] D_C@lemm.ee 12 points 11 months ago

I, from the UK, once had a 'conversation' about gun control with an American on Reddit. What brought this about was the day before a 9 year old girl was killed by a stray bullet from a drive-by. One moment she was in her bedroom doing some homework, and the next she was dead.

After a lot of back and forth with him getting more flummoxed and aggressive he then said something like "If she was outside playing like a normal kid then she wouldn't have been killed."
Yep, he blamed her.

That was the time I realised it was a waste of everything talking about it.

[-] jpreston2005@lemmy.world 9 points 11 months ago

people who argue that their right to guns is more important than a persons right to life is inherently moronic, and shouldn't be listened to.

[-] bedrooms@kbin.social 6 points 11 months ago

One thing I've learned is that, if you write a comment with reasonable
balance of views and still get attacks, the posters are people without proper trainings on critical debates.

In case of the gun ban, it's even worse because most people never lived in the rest of the world.

[-] chitak166@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_firearm-related_death_rate

Are guns legal in: El Salvador, Venezuela, Eswatini, Jamaica, Honduras, Guatemala, Brazil, and Columbia?

All of those nations have higher firearm death rates than the US.

If guns are illegal in any of the nations with higher firearm death rates than the US, then can you acknowledge that banning guns is not the only issue? Maybe culture has something to do with it?

[-] deft@ttrpg.network 7 points 11 months ago

you just named countries well known for organized crime and corrupt government officials.

I don't think it is the same

[-] chitak166@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

then can you acknowledge that banning guns is not the only issue? Maybe culture has something to do with it?

[-] masterspace@lemmy.ca 9 points 11 months ago

Can you acknowledge that some issues require addressing multiple factors? Or can your brain not handle that level of complex thought?

[-] chitak166@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

I literally said "banning guns is not the only issue."

Learn to read before you start insulting someone else's intelligence.

[-] masterspace@lemmy.ca 7 points 11 months ago

The "issue" is not banning guns.

The issue is people dying en masse repeatedly from guns.

Get that straight. Banning guns is a partial solution that helps to address the issue in literally every single western country.

[-] chitak166@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

Get what straight? Your views even though many other people in this comment chain say banning guns is the solution?

Banning guns is a partial solution that helps to address the issue in literally every single western country.

Really? Another person said it's gun control, not banning.

[-] masterspace@lemmy.ca 2 points 11 months ago

Answer the question: multiple factors contribute to a problem, do you a) address none of them or b) address all of them?

[-] chitak166@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

B.

Some people in this thread think banning guns will solve the problem. They believe the only reason the US firearm death rate is so high is because guns are legal.

[-] masterspace@lemmy.ca 2 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

And they are right.

The widespread availability of guns is one of the factors contributing to the rate and severity of gun crime, and needs to be addressed, in addition to poverty and mental health.

It's really not complicated.

[-] pinkdrunkenelephants@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

Those people are power seeking bullies and banning guns absolutely won't stop them from killing others. They'll just smuggle them in, or use or build other weapons to accomplish the same goal.

You care way more about banning guns than solving the problem and it is obvious to anyone with any insight.

[-] Chip_Rat@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago

While I agree that banning guns won't eliminate people illegally smuggling guns in, I'd still really appreciate it if the US would ban (most) firearms, that way Canada could chill the fuck out and have sensible gun laws without a freeking firehose of illegal and cheap guns blasting us from the south.

There are many ways to legislate and protect the population while allowing responsible and vetted citizens to own and use firearms, they just all get throw out the window when it's easier to drive one over the border in a 3 hour black Friday round trip for 1/3 the price than it is to jump through the legal hoops to be allowed to purchase and own one here.

[-] pinkdrunkenelephants@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

Well then, they're very much right to accuse you of exploiting a tragedy to push a political agenda, aren't they?

Leave your gun ban crap in your filthy-ass bedroom and let the rest of us deal with how to save our children from ourselves and our broken society.

[-] masterspace@lemmy.ca 2 points 11 months ago

You meant to say 'save the children from the guns being used to murder them', but mistyped it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Chip_Rat@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago
[-] deft@ttrpg.network 5 points 11 months ago

the fuck are you trying to say here???

Banning guns is the only issue. Full stop.

[-] chitak166@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

Why are you swearing at me and using multiple question marks?

[-] masterspace@lemmy.ca 6 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Did you not read the part where they said that dumb Americans can shut up and keep their idiocacy to themselves?

Like honestly, this is the DUMBEST fucking argument I've ever heard.

Multiple factors contribute to the both the rate and severity of violent crime, congratulations Einstein! Now answer me this, when multiple factors contribute to something happening, and you want to stop that something from happening, do you a) sit around and do nothing and say it's impossible to address in any way shape or form cause the solution requires addressing multiple factors, or do you b) try and address all the factors contributing to it, starting with the easiest and most obvious ones?

Like Jesus Christ, think with your fucking brain, not the lead dust poisoning it.

[-] chitak166@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

Calm down and people might take you seriously.

[-] masterspace@lemmy.ca 6 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Say something that's not a brain dead NRA argument if you want people to not insult your intelligence.

Tell us again how when multiple factors contribute to a problem that means you can't address any of them.

That was your argument right?

load more comments (11 replies)
[-] StorminNorman@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago

Guns are legal in all those countries besides Venezuela. Cos guns are legal in most of the world. It's just they are generally controlled. And Venezuela is on the verge on collapse anyway. I don't think this is the slam dunk argument you think it is.

[-] chitak166@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

Guns are legal in all those countries besides Venezuela. Cos guns are legal in most of the world.

Then why doesn't most of the world have a firearm homicide rate comparable to that of the US?

[-] StorminNorman@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago

Literally suggested a reason for that with my very next sentence.

[-] chitak166@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

So you don't think guns should be banned?

[-] StorminNorman@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago

You're not arguing in good faith here. I've answered you're initial, idiotic, comment. I've answered your second, idiotic, comment that was highly selective in what it quoted of me as if it was trying to "gotcha" me. And now this horseshit? I've already alluded to how most of the rest of the world does it, I suggest you go read up on it rather than trying to push your agenda on me.

load more comments (8 replies)
[-] D_C@lemm.ee 2 points 11 months ago

"That was the time I realised it was a waste of everything talking about it."

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (94 replies)
this post was submitted on 15 Dec 2023
221 points (100.0% liked)

News

23311 readers
3230 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS