1407
submitted 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world

Summary

Trump and Zelenskyy's confrontational Oval Office meeting advanced "mob boss foreign policy" serving Russian interests.

Trump and Vance bullied Zelenskyy when he refused their "extortionate" minerals deal or to thank them despite Trump's stated intent to reduce support for Ukraine.

Zelenskyy effectively countered their claims by noting Russia's 2014 invasion and correcting historical inaccuracies, which angered the Americans.

This represents the first openly “anti-US, anti-Western, anti-democracy foreign policy in American history.” Russians embraced it, and Putin ally and former Russian president Dmitry Medvedev celebrated the exchange.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] sommerset@thelemmy.club 3 points 1 day ago

I'm with Trump on Ukraine.

And I don't support Trump on other issues.

It's fucking stupid supporting them. Whole thing started back in the days, but the world changed dramatically since.

[-] match@pawb.social 14 points 1 day ago

how is life in Russia nowadays, by the way? we get almost no reports of it other than the occasional protestors getting shut down

[-] Mistic@lemmy.world 1 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

Inflation of food prices is very noticeable. Still manageable, though.

Taxes are getting higher.

Lots of services can't be paid for due to sanctions. Some payments are possible, but for a premium.

Roscomnadzor still pisses everybody off. They're slowing down YouTube to an unusable rate. They claim it's Google's hardware degrading (It's not). Then there's Discord being blocked, and now they seemingly want to target Steam for some unknown reason (the reason is VKontacte needs more money).

More insane legislature is being talked about.

The lingering threat of being drafted or randomly killed by a drone isn't gone, which is emotionally draining.

People want peace. Yet, put responsibility on incumbent. (Think: "We had no say in it, they started it, they'll finish it")

Opposition? What opposition? Everybody's either jailed or were forced to leave the country. They'll literally lock up a single father up if he dares to show disagreement with their "special military operation." And the kid? Who cares? They don't matter to our very just and absolutely not corrupt courts. (Sry, still fuming about that story. Hope the judge and the principal will rot in hell)

That's about it. Source: me, also russian news media and official legislature sources

[-] sommerset@thelemmy.club 1 points 1 day ago
[-] match@pawb.social 5 points 1 day ago

huh, i was wondering about life in Russia

[-] gadfly1999@lemm.ee 5 points 21 hours ago

It tracks. US may as well be a Russian colony at this point

[-] WhatSay@slrpnk.net 12 points 1 day ago

So... If China tries to take Taiwan, is that ok? Is it perfectly normal for the US to threaten to take Greenland and Panama?

Or are we pretending that war, genocide and taking over neighboring counties is just a one-off situation?

[-] sommerset@thelemmy.club 2 points 1 day ago

Yes. And I will tell you even more - we can't do shit for Taiwan.

It's too far away to resupply, and legally - it belongs to China.

[-] dellish@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago

The fuck are you talking about?? The US managed to resupply in Iraq and Afghanistan for 20 years,and they're a LOT further away.

[-] sommerset@thelemmy.club 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

years,and they’re a LOT further away.

but its completely different situation.
those were 3rd word countries that were without any strong party backing.
with Taiwan - what's your plan? openly engage China? start ww3 over Taiwan?
this is - i'm sorry - this is fucking nuts.

US can't win that even with conventional weapons, those transports gonna be sunk before getting anywhere close to Taiwan.

[-] dellish@lemmy.world 2 points 17 hours ago

No no, you said "too far away to resupply". I claim bullshit. I never suggested it was a good idea.

[-] Knoxvomica@lemmy.ca 10 points 1 day ago

In that case the US should be British still. Fucking uppity colony is what it is.

[-] sommerset@thelemmy.club 1 points 1 day ago

come and take it

[-] Zron@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago

Troops in Vietnam had ice cream and cold Coca Cola.

There are mobile Burger Kings that can be loaded into military supply transports.

That’s just food.

You have no idea the capabilities of US logistics. Why do you think we have military bases on 6 continents and half the countries in the fucking world. It’s not just for fucking fun. The whole point is that the US can have a fully supplied fighting force anywhere in the world within a couple days.

Go lick fascist boots somewhere else. I still stand by the idea that democracy should be defended.

[-] sommerset@thelemmy.club 1 points 1 day ago

Why do you think we have military bases on 6 continents and half the countries in the fucking world.

completely different situation.
Vietnam - US was fighting against 3-rd world country. Sure with USSR/China backing, but indirect still.

When you talk about Taiwan - you are talking about directly engaging China for a Chinese island that's 60 miles from China and thousands of miles from US.
how do you picture that going?
if there is a hot war between US and China that's somehow without nuclear (again - im asking you how is it going to be without nuclear) -> none of those transports gonna reach Taiwan for resupply.

it's a simple production math - they can outbuild US in rockets probably 10 to 1 and with modern technology - none of US carriers/strike groups gonna be able to do shit. they gonna be sunk super quick.

math is not mathing - give that fucking island to China, I dont want ww3 because of it.

this post was submitted on 01 Mar 2025
1407 points (100.0% liked)

politics

20563 readers
3441 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS