159

Italian police accused of making female activists remove underwear and do squats (www.theguardian.com)

submitted 17 hours ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/world@lemmy.world

21 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Summary

Italian police in Brescia face allegations of degrading treatment after seven female climate activists from Extinction Rebellion claimed they were forced to remove their underwear and perform squats during questioning.

The activists, detained after a protest against Leonardo, an aerospace company, accused police of singling out women for this treatment.

Police denied misconduct, stating the procedure was to search for dangerous objects.

The incident has prompted calls for an investigation from opposition politicians amid debates over a controversial security bill targeting climate activists with harsher penalties.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] Omgboom@lemmy.zip 38 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago)

Lol it's to make sure you don't have anything shoved up inside of you. It's like you guys haven't ever been arrested before.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Body_cavity_search#Procedure

Squatting is sometimes instructed during the visual search, and prolonged holding of a squat can be demanded; squats are sometimes demanded while standing over a mirror (so that the observer has an improved view). The person may be asked to “squat and cough,” with the aim of dislodging an object stored in the rectum or vagina.

Edit: For the record fuck the police always, but this is a pretty standard part of being searched before you are processed

[-] theacharnian@lemmy.ca 6 points 6 hours ago

Super standard, which is exactly why initially the police denied doing it 😒

[-] ValiantDust@feddit.org 30 points 16 hours ago

but this is a pretty standard part of being searched before you are processed

Not everyone lives in the US. If I remember correctly, here in Germany they are not allowed to routinely do these searches (doesn't mean they can't do them, but it's not standard when you are arrested). I think it's based on EU laws, so the same probably applies to Italy.

[-] HikingVet@lemmy.ca 25 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago)

Then why are they saying only the women had to do this?

Edit: I've never had a cavity search any of the times I have been arrested.

[-] glowie@h4x0r.host 2 points 9 hours ago

Don’t waste your time, people no longer like facts just feelings

[-] HikingVet@lemmy.ca 17 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago)

From the same article

United States edit

In the United States, Bell v. Wolfish is the benchmark case on this issue. In its judgment of the case, the U.S. Supreme Court established a standard of reasonable grounds for performing cavity searches. Among these are security concerns at prisons. Such searches are generally governed by the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution, which prohibits searches without probable cause.[3]

[-] HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com 4 points 12 hours ago

I sorta need this explanation. Some fucked up shit.

[-] HikingVet@lemmy.ca 6 points 11 hours ago

A lot of countries require the equivalent of probable cause to do a cavity search before entering institutions like prisons, jails, or asylums as a prisoner or patient.

[-] Nikelui@lemmy.world 5 points 16 hours ago

It's like you guys haven't ever been arrested before.

I can't say I have been, so thank you for the explanation.

this post was submitted on 16 Jan 2025

159 points (100.0% liked)

World News

39595 readers

1519 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:
- Post news articles only
- Video links are NOT articles and will be removed.
- Title must match the article headline
- Not United States Internal News
- Recent (Past 30 Days)
- Screenshots/links to other social media sites (Twitter/X/Facebook/Youtube/reddit, etc.) are explicitly forbidden, as are link shorteners.
Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think "Is this fair use?", it probably isn't. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.
Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed. Sources that have a Low or Very Low factual reporting rating or MBFC Credibility Rating may be removed.
Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.
Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF 10/19
Rule 5: Keep it civil. It's OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It's NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.
Rule 7: We didn't USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you're posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.