75
submitted 2 months ago by communism@lemmy.ml to c/privacy@lemmy.ml

I've been reading through Signal's government requests and couldn't find a similar section on Mullvad's website. I'd be curious to read about them if there are any. It would seem unlikely to me that Mullvad has never received any kind of court order for information about a user.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] delirious_owl@discuss.online 4 points 2 months ago

They brought it back? That's concerning

[-] ReveredOxygen@sh.itjust.works 6 points 2 months ago

They realized banning convenience is bad for business. You can still pay in private ways

[-] delirious_owl@discuss.online 2 points 2 months ago

When they announced it, they said it would be bad for business, but that they valued their customers privacy more than the cost it would cause in lost business.

this post was submitted on 08 Aug 2024
75 points (100.0% liked)

Privacy

31800 readers
128 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

Chat rooms

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS