495
submitted 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) by spaghettiwestern@sh.itjust.works to c/politics@lemmy.world

Washington Post: Donald Trump can be held civilly liable for the actions of the mob that attacked the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021, an appeals court ruled Friday in a long-awaited decision that could clear the way for lawsuits seeking financial damages from the former president.

all 36 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Chainweasel@lemmy.world 82 points 11 months ago

Can we get a nationwide class action lawsuit going?

[-] Rockyrikoko@lemm.ee 43 points 11 months ago

He detonated the deep personal relationships I had with half my friends and most of my family, what's that worth?

[-] surewhynotlem@lemmy.world 16 points 11 months ago
[-] aesthelete@lemmy.world 7 points 11 months ago

But I could buy three freedoms for that price.

[-] FrostyTrichs@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

You can get like 600 freedoms and a bunch of free shit you don't want on Temu for a ducket and a half.

[-] cheese_greater@lemmy.world 6 points 11 months ago

Is any part of you secretly ok with coming to know deeper who they really were? Like, do you think he actually instilled anything that wasn't already latent, he didn't just fan the flame a little?

[-] Rapidcreek@reddthat.com 67 points 11 months ago

Let the pile-on begin!

I'm considering suing Trump for intentional infliction of emotional distress caused by his riots and rioters.

And I'll seek $11,780,000 in damages.

Who's in?

[-] mibo80@lemm.ee 17 points 11 months ago

That's all we need. We're just asking him to find it.

[-] TheRealLinga@sh.itjust.works 9 points 11 months ago
[-] Sterile_Technique@lemmy.world 7 points 11 months ago

Shouldn't need that for a civil sentence, but stay ready.

[-] SinningStromgald@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago
[-] Locuralacura@lemm.ee 29 points 11 months ago

Do it! Do it! Do it! Do it!Do it! Do it!

[-] jennwiththesea@lemmy.world 25 points 11 months ago

This is wealth redistribution at its finest. MAGAt donors --> Those who've been harmed by Trump, et al.

[-] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 23 points 11 months ago

I mean, the supporters that were following his orders should sue him too.

[-] n0m4n@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago

This court drew a line that separates Presidential conduct and civil conduct. This reinforces the other courts ruling against rioters, who were asking for leniency or exoneration because they were "following the Commander in Chief's orders." In short, their dumb-assery is on them.

[-] muse@kbin.social 22 points 11 months ago

Looks like meat's back on the menu, boys!

[-] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 17 points 11 months ago

As of this writing, this thread has 11 comments, and 2 of them are LOTR references.

[-] Deconceptualist@lemm.ee 15 points 11 months ago

One does not simply walk into comment threads expecting no LOTR references.

[-] muse@kbin.social 4 points 11 months ago

I'm proud to have done my part

[-] Newguy@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago
[-] Kase@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago
[-] Marin_Rider@aussie.zone 2 points 11 months ago

less than half of what you'd hoped for?

[-] Rally@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

You have my axe?

[-] IchNichtenLichten@lemmy.world 13 points 11 months ago

A whole raft of lawsuits against a guy who can only attract the absolute worst lawyers? Game on.

[-] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 5 points 11 months ago

That's like they've pulled the goalie.

[-] Heresy_generator@kbin.social 12 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Another hole in his claims of Total Presidential Monarchy.

[-] Dkarma@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago

Someone should move on it like a bitch.

[-] ElectricTrombone@lemmy.world 9 points 11 months ago

And my axe!

[-] FoundTheVegan@kbin.social 9 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Ooooooh! FUN!

So we are gonna see just a giant wave of civil suits.

this post was submitted on 01 Dec 2023
495 points (100.0% liked)

politics

19104 readers
2400 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS