505

Elaine R. Bryant spoke after an officer responded to a dad's call that his 11-year-old daughter was talking to a "predator" online.

all 44 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 146 points 1 year ago

He tells the officers his daughter is already asleep, and that he had hoped they could help talk to her about the seriousness of the situation. The female officer quickly tells him that his daughter could be charged with creating sexually explicit content.

The father protests and says that she is a child who was manipulated by an adult, according to the police report and the father’s TikTok video. The officer asks him if she was taking pictures, and the father ends the conversation.

In audio of the body camera footage, the female officer can be heard asserting again as she walks away from the house, “She’s taking pictures of herself naked. She’s creating child porn.”

This is the same fucking logic groomers use...

Once they get anything they shouldn't have, they blame the victim and blackmail them into more and more stuff.

Even if they do t get anything more, the child would be less likely to tell anyone.

It's fucking insane that the issue isn't these cops, the actual law is set up like this, and there's no way to know how often it prevents report.

[-] NatakuNox@lemmy.world 81 points 1 year ago

Well you see tracking down sex offenders is difficult. But persecuting under aged girls is much easier, so the police took that route. (I wish I was joking. But police are unbelievably bad at catching criminals)

https://ualr.edu/socialchange/2021/03/31/the-injustice-of-americas-rape-kit-backlog/#:~:text=It%20is%20estimated%20that%20there,a%20day%2C%20or%20a%20month%E2%80%A6

The police can't even be bothered to process rape kits so states just ban abortion to solve the rape problem in America.

[-] RaoulDook@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

Standard same old cop bullshit. They are too lazy to look for the actual bad guy so they try to make the victim (hey she's right here already!) into a criminal they can charge with some crime, so they can pat themselves on the back as the great Heroes of the community.

[-] sara@lemmy.today 135 points 1 year ago

It’s disgusting cops are victim blaming a literal 6th grader for being preyed on, but not at all surprising unfortunately.

[-] jeremy@midwest.social 82 points 1 year ago

This is standard. I know of a minor who was groomed, and he was told repeatedly that he could be charged with creating child pornography. Don't let the Columbus PD fool you: this is how they all behave.

[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 45 points 1 year ago

The departmental issue is they got caught on video.

That’s what the chief is “disappointed in” and insists “doesn’t reflect the department”…

[-] hypelightfly@kbin.social 15 points 1 year ago

"This doesn't reflect the department, usually we don't get caught."

[-] snooggums@kbin.social 8 points 1 year ago

"We don't really look in the mirror and reflect on our behavior because that would make us feel bad."

[-] HawlSera@lemm.ee 12 points 1 year ago

The usual, sorry I got caught

[-] cedarmesa@lemmy.world 34 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)
[-] Mr_Buscemi 14 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It's the same thing they did to my sister when she was 19. A guy in our city found her online and began stalking her everywhere. He would harass her and send her disgusting things even though she had never met or talked to the guy before.

When we called the police and had one come to the house to file a report, the cop was just blaming my sister. He was acting like he couldn't imagine a boy would do these things if my sister didn't lead him on.

A few years later the guy sent a underage girl from my school his dick pic. She showed it to me because she was disgusted and both amused at how pathetic it looked. It was sadly not the last time I've seen his dick pic.

Now the fucker has a YouTube documentary about how pathetic he is and it's at over 500k views.

[-] Cjwii@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago
[-] Mr_Buscemi 1 points 1 year ago

https://youtu.be/afdRKnEwujg?si=FgVLc7rba7we8kXo

I had completely forgotten to link to it lmfao.

I have no idea how he even found my sister. Houston is a large city and he somehow picked her a decade ago to torment.

[-] ininewcrow@lemmy.ca 12 points 1 year ago

The problem to them is not that they said what they said .... the problem to them is that they got caught saying it.

[-] Clent@lemmy.world 52 points 1 year ago

All I hear is, "I'm sorry and concerned a recording of my fellow officers went viral"

[-] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 50 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Resigns? Fired?

There's no excuse for this.

[-] ChrisLicht@lemm.ee 48 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

FWIW, I have never met an intelligent cop or detective. I have met some remarkably unintelligent cops and detectives.

It’s rather shocking that the next step in the criminal justice system requires 7 years of education and the ability to pass a bar exam, but police officers range from dolt to average in intelligence, and are often loosed on the streets with months of training.

This is no way to run a criminal justice system.

[-] reverendsteveii@lemm.ee 30 points 1 year ago

You've never met an intelligent cop because the cops have a maximum IQ above which applicants are disqualified

https://abcnews.go.com/amp/US/court-oks-barring-high-iqs-cops/story?id=95836

[-] ChrisLicht@lemm.ee 12 points 1 year ago

And, those dummy-to-mediocre cops compose the pool from which detectives are promoted.

Bryant concluded her statement by saying: "As I have said from the first day on the job — when our officers do the right thing, we will have their back. When they don't, we will hold them accountable."

Ok, Chief Bryant, we're waiting!

[-] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago

Hit ‘em hard with that paid leave!

[-] HawlSera@lemm.ee 10 points 1 year ago

I feel like an apology isn't quite as impactful as arresting the police officers who bullied a child rape victim....

[-] Ransom@lemmy.one 9 points 1 year ago

When I hear that one of these good apples has fallen in the line of duty, I say a prayer of thanks.

[-] newthrowaway20@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

Anyone got the actual video?

[-] geosoco@kbin.social 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)
[-] darthfabulous42069@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

Shameful. Absolutely shameful.

[-] Zoldyck@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago
this post was submitted on 21 Sep 2023
505 points (100.0% liked)

News

23275 readers
3464 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS