325
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] rozodru@lemmy.world 21 points 3 days ago

Because it's not about saving lives, it never has been. It's about control.

[-] angrystego@lemmy.world 32 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

I think they just see it as very simple: killing innocent babies - no, killing evil criminals - yes. It sounds perfectly alright if you don't think about it too much.

[-] Ixoid@lemm.ee 9 points 2 days ago

It's not about ethics, it never was. It's about CONTROL.

[-] Toneswirly@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago

welcome to high school debate class, where we think about issues with more nuance than most politicians.

[-] CM400@lemmy.world 112 points 4 days ago

Just guessing here, but I’d assume it’s because the unborn have potential and the bad guys had their chance. I don’t agree, but that’s what I assume being around some people like that…

[-] humblebun@sh.itjust.works 10 points 4 days ago

You are a bad man and you should feel bad about yourself

[-] Rhynoplaz@lemmy.world 11 points 4 days ago

Well, I at least thought it was a little funny.

[-] kambusha@sh.itjust.works 10 points 4 days ago

I'm assuming it was sarcasm/a joke too, but hard to know these days, without either knowing someone, or the obvious /s. Some crazy people out there...

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] ragepaw@lemmy.ca 22 points 3 days ago

Because it's never been about anything other than control. The right to choose anything is abhorrent to them. The only rights they want you to have are the right to be dictated to and the right to be like them.

[-] vzq@lemmy.world 75 points 4 days ago

As someone recently told me, they don’t worry about saving lives, they worry about saving souls.

You need to abide by the quaint rules of the magical sky daddy for that, even if they don’t make sense.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Bytemeister@lemmy.world 13 points 3 days ago

I'm pro-choice, but mostly anti-death penalty, isn't that a contradiction?

I don't really think so. A person's bodily autonomy and the state's power to execute citizens should not overlap.

[-] Seasoned_Greetings@lemm.ee 7 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

I think it's not necessarily a contradiction to hold your pro-choice and anti-death penalty stance, but it's still a contradiction to hold the pro-life and pro-death penalty stance if your reasoning behind the pro-life stance is that all life is sacred.

I agree that a person's body autonomy and the state's power to execute citizens should not overlap, but I still think that giving the "all life is sacred" line to justify pro-life and then being pro-death penalty "because some people deserve to die" amounts to hypocrisy.

[-] Draconic_NEO@lemmy.world 13 points 3 days ago

They don't actually care about life, they just don't want women to have control over their bodies.

[-] mechoman444@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

Because it's not about saving the lives of unborn babies and it never has been.

It's about curtailing choice.

[-] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Forced birthers don't actually care about "life". They care about violently controlling anybody who isn't a pale bro.

[-] theywilleatthestars@lemmy.world 33 points 4 days ago

They're obsessed with punishment. A lot of them see unwanted pregnancy as a just punishment for recreational sex.

[-] Sibbo@sopuli.xyz 38 points 4 days ago

Arguably, an unborn baby cannot be guilty of anything. But an adult sentenced to death is often guilty of some horrible crime. So if you accept killing as a punishment, there is no contradiction.

[-] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 11 points 4 days ago

Until you realize that our court system is FULL of false arrests, and the courts have some stupid high number like 98% conviction rate.

They say "take the deal, or the court will fuck you".

2 years vs 30 years.

And then later they run a second trial for something else that has a death penalty as the outcome. The jury is shown this guy, already in prison, for a semi-related charge. Already convicted of the other charge. So his ability to appear innocent is already swayed. And now suddenly there's no deal. The court goes full hammer. The jury is made to believe he did it 100%.

And he can't say he didn't do it, and wasn't even there, because he ALREADY pleaded guilty to the other charge which would place him there.

So now you got a populace, who wasn't in either court session, not seeing how this escalated, and not willing to believe our court system may be flawed. Just kill the criminal and move on, right?

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] davidagain@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

They want men to choose who lives or dies. They absolutely do not want women to be in charge of anything. That's why no exceptions in the case of rape and incest. A man made a decision, they don't want a woman to have the power to reverse it.

[-] WoahWoah@lemmy.world 24 points 3 days ago

The death penalty doesn't control women.

[-] scarabic@lemmy.world 9 points 3 days ago

Liberals in favor of reproductive rights also tend to be against the death penalty. Is that a contradiction? Conservatives love twisting this into “they want to kill babies, not criminals.”

Do you think they’re right about that? Or is it more nuanced of an issue? If it’s more nuanced of an issue, then it’s more nuanced in both directions.

Liberals prioritize the woman’s ability to decide what happens with her body. They don’t like abortions, but they think they must be allowed if that’s what the woman chooses. They also recognize that it’s a medical procedure that’s absolutely necessary sometimes and other times might prevent an unwanted child from being born into bad circumstances. Meanwhile, liberals tend to be against the death penalty because our justice system is very flawed and innocent people have been put to death in the past. Perhaps a woman is allowed to decide what happens to a congregation of cells inside her body, but people shouldn’t decide the life or death of other people when imprisonment is always there as an option.

Conservatives think in terms of essentials and things are very black and white. It’s either a baby or it isn’t. They think life comes from god so it’s his affair and not our place to countermand a new life that he’s just brought into being. Meanwhile if a grown person with a mind chooses to commit crimes, that’s on them. God makes some pretty hard judgments in the Bible so they think great we can too and that will make us like god. Conservatives also tend to believe that some people are essentially good, and others are essentially bad. And in that framework, once a person has shown themselves to be a criminal, you know they are bad so what’s the point of letting them live. Meanwhile you have no idea if a fetus in the womb will be good or bad yet.

Please don’t downvote me for understanding both positions :)

[-] SharkEatingBreakfast@sopuli.xyz 25 points 4 days ago

Because they don't care about "life".

They care about punishing people.

[-] bamfic@lemmy.world 7 points 3 days ago

An unwanted unplanned baby is punishment for having sex outside of marriage.

Death penalty is punishment for being convicted of murder.

It's perfectly consistent when you look at it all about punishment.

The cruelty is indeed the point

[-] linearchaos@lemmy.world 16 points 3 days ago

In the end, it's because they're told that that's the way it is.

Abortion makes a an easy political point. Vote for the children.

Being hard on crime and executing people, That's another easy political point. Vote for the law abiding citizens.

They don't care that those two things are at odds They don't care about life or death. They care about their own exact situation, and don't really give a rat's ass about anyone else. They believe that the team they're backing gives them the best advantage, and that's absolutely all they care about. Beyond that, it's simply consuming and regurgitating the propaganda, self-perpetuating.

[-] Blackmist@feddit.uk 2 points 2 days ago

Makes more sense when you realise it isn't about life, but about punishing women for having sex.

[-] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 17 points 4 days ago

contradiction

You’ve discovered conservative politics. Party of freedom that wants to restrict women’s access to healthcare, books in schools, reproductive rights, healthcare for children, etc.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Walk_blesseD 13 points 3 days ago

Because with reactionaries, the cruelty is the point.

[-] november@lemmy.vg 14 points 3 days ago

Kind of seems like a contradiction

They don't care. There's no point in calling conservatives out on hypocrisy. Only a very small number of them will give a shit, and those will be the ones who were already having doubts.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] whoisearth@lemmy.ca 7 points 3 days ago

I'm pro abortion and against the death penalty! Someone ask me! I promise I'm not a troll. I am honestly pro abortion not just pro choice.

[-] Moobythegoldensock@lemm.ee 4 points 3 days ago

What do you mean by that? You’re an anti-natalist?

[-] whoisearth@lemmy.ca 4 points 3 days ago

Nope. I actually think life is sacred. The reason I'm pro-abortion is because I think anything that can be done to further impede children being born when we have hundreds of thousands of children in America alone who are orphans. That is a travesty.

My challenge to anyone who is anti-abortion would be are they adopting? Because their shit position is perpetuating a stream of children being born without someone to care for them either physically or emotionally.

In a perfect world, abortion would not exist outside of medical necessity. Unfortunately we do not live in a perfect world and as such many women are having children to be born into a cold and loveless world.

It's sad. I could not imagine how cruel someone would have to be to be anti-abortion and yet so willing to effectively let a child's life be aborted once they're born.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[-] barsquid@lemmy.world 6 points 3 days ago

It is, but they will persist because their motivation has nothing to do with rational thinking.

[-] Nemo@slrpnk.net 17 points 4 days ago

It's not all the same people: Roman Catholics, for example, tend to oppose both.

[-] dhork@lemmy.world 9 points 4 days ago

Roman Catholic doctrine opposes both, but the bishops don't go around threatening to withhold religious services for politicians who allow the death penalty like they do with pro-choice politicians....

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Yeller_king@reddthat.com 13 points 3 days ago

They would argue that the "baby" is innocent.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] LucidNightmare@lemm.ee 5 points 3 days ago

They only care until you’re born, then you can go and die in a ditch somewhere.

[-] Nosavingthrow@lemmy.world 9 points 3 days ago

IS it a contradiction? I don't agree with the death penalty or anti-abortion position, but I don't see some essential link between either position. You can hold two different beliefs about two different things is how come.

[-] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 10 points 3 days ago

They literally call themselves pro-life and then express support for the death penalty.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] beefbot 7 points 3 days ago

They’re both cruel to anyone “below” them (this is a simplistic argument.) They’re easy to cry wolf about in order to draw people over to your side, people who vote and act emotionally

[-] chalupapocalypse@lemmy.world 12 points 4 days ago

Because they are hypocrites, once that baby leaves the womb they give zero fucks.

Don't get an abortion, also we aren't paying for that kids lunch

[-] mhague@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago

If you smoke weed you're more likely to wear converse. It's aesthetics. When someone says they're anti abortion I usually see it as aesthetics. They want others to see them as being anti abortion. That's what they get out of it.

It isn't a literal belief. Democrats reduce abortions, much better than cons. Being anti abortion should mean voting for Democrats... IF you were still taking things literally. It's not misinformation or lack of education, it's misaligned priorities.

They're just trying to be a tribe and signal allegiance. To have literal beliefs that you live by regardless of "your side" is a completely different game to what they're playing.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 19 Oct 2024
325 points (100.0% liked)

No Stupid Questions

35604 readers
217 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS