1233
submitted 2 months ago by 101@feddit.org to c/microblogmemes@lemmy.world
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] bstix@feddit.dk 250 points 2 months ago

Fuckin space garbage is what it is.

Yes it was impressive that they landed a rocket again once, but the quantity of launches and satellites is doing nothing good for anyone. It should've been a stepping stone for better technology, but instead they're just mining money. Privately owned space engineering is a disgrace to humanity.

Space engineering used to unite even the worst opponents as with the international space station, but now those institutions are underfunded, while billionaire space-musk can shoot his loads into the atmosphere without any regard to the rest of the worlds population living inside said sphere.

Tax the asshole already.

[-] LarmyOfLone@lemm.ee 61 points 2 months ago

I was excited about starlink when it was announced, but already it's way too expensive, already bows to actual totalitarians and isn't affordable on the ocean and not available in remote places without a license.

And with more satellite constellations planned by amazon and others, it seems the kessler syndrome is just a question of time.

load more comments (13 replies)
[-] pg_jglr@sh.itjust.works 27 points 2 months ago

This. I wish I had more than one up vote I could give for this comment.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] glitchdx@lemmy.world 123 points 2 months ago

starlink wouldn't have a leg to stand on (in the US, can't speak for elsewhere) if isps were held to installing/maintaining/upgrading infrastructure that was already paid for by the federal government decades ago and then the isps just didn't do the work.

load more comments (23 replies)
[-] Moah 115 points 2 months ago

Sending so many satellites also requires so many rocket launchers that Google passed on it because it was too polluting.

Starlink is the poster child of "fuck you, I got mine."

[-] brlemworld@lemmy.world 30 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Google is the second largest shareholder of Space X.

[-] nonfuinoncuro@lemm.ee 36 points 2 months ago
  1. get rid of "do no evil"
  2. invest in evil
  3. ?????
  4. profit!
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] varjen@lemmy.world 78 points 2 months ago

Don't forget all the fun chemicals they leave in the atmosphere when they deorbit.

[-] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 55 points 2 months ago

"Don't worry, you can just build one on the moon. You can even pay me to use my rockets to get there." - Elon

[-] Zron@lemmy.world 11 points 2 months ago

*Terms and conditions apply

**Rocket may or may not be capable of reaching low earth orbit, payload fractions subject to change, not responsible for loss of equipment, habitat, or lives

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Kyrgizion@lemmy.world 51 points 2 months ago

I'm sure Musk is perfectly willing to turn certain constellations off at specific times... For a price, of course.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] linkshulkdoingit69@lemmy.nz 50 points 2 months ago

To me Elon Musk is like the real-life, slightly less dramatic and slightly less evil Handsome Jack out of Borderlands

[-] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 28 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Less evil than Handsome Jack?! Jack's at least a good guy in the Presequel. Was Elon ever good?

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[-] mvirts@lemmy.world 39 points 2 months ago

If it can interfere with large aperture ground telescopes.. it would be a shame if those ground telescopes grew transmitters and started interfering back.

[-] M0oP0o@mander.xyz 39 points 2 months ago

Is it weird I agree these are terrible and yet also hope this spurs the end of ground based observation in favor of a larger orbital presence?

[-] TrueStoryBob@lemmy.world 19 points 2 months ago

We could and should be doing both ground and orbital radio telescope observations. One really interesting idea I've seen floated is to put one on the far-side of the moon; it'd be shielded from all our radio emissions but, of course, it would be somewhat suspectable to interference from the sun for weeks at a time.

What I've never understood about Starlink is how it's better than existing satellite internet beamed from geosynchronous craft... like, geosync is crowded (especially over North America and Europe), but it's not so crowded we couldn't put a couple more transponders up there. Objects in geosync rarely have the astronomical side effects that Starlink is apparently causing. It would even solve the Starlink issue of having to have an expense af receiver with active tracking... just nail up a stationary ku-band dish that doesn't need to move ever. This is already solved technology.

[-] i_stole_ur_taco@lemmy.ca 20 points 2 months ago

The problem with geosynchronous orbit is that you need to be at a high altitude to maintain it. That increases the packet round trip time to a receiver on the ground. Starlink satellites orbit low enough to give a theoretical 20ms ping. A geostationary satellite would be at best 500ms. It’s fine for some tasks but lousy for applications that need low latency, like video calling.

load more comments (27 replies)
load more comments (13 replies)
[-] Saledovil@sh.itjust.works 28 points 2 months ago

Isn't Starlink also too expensive because you have to replace the satellites every 5 years? As in you'd have to sell to basically everybody on earth to be profitable. And they charge 50Euros a month, almost twice as much as I currently pay, and I'm satisfied with my current provider.

[-] asterfield@lemmy.world 12 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

50Euros a month, almost twice as much as I current pay

Wow Canada sucks in our ISP choices

[-] Asafum@feddit.nl 11 points 2 months ago

Cries in long island

I have one option that isn't 4g wireless crap... It's $110/month for 500mbps... It was $80/month but they felt the need to make more money by eliminating their lower tiers and "forcing" you to upgrade... I just suddenly had a 500mbps plan and $110 bill without asking them to change anything...

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 25 points 2 months ago

Great. Musk is building a Sophon.

[-] Seraph@fedia.io 21 points 2 months ago

Down em all then. We need a satellite with lasers to take out other satellites: whether it's Russia's, China's, or Elon's.

[-] r_deckard@lemmy.world 20 points 2 months ago

Disclaimer - I have a starlink terminal. I feel that the complaints should be made to the various governments that haven't mandated modern terrestrial technologies to those of us outside metro areas.

I live 14km/9m from a town with underground fibre optic. The best I can hope for is geo-synch satellite with data caps and latency around 600ms. I will never see fibre optic rolled out here. I can sort of understand, it's quite expensive and needs to be balanced against income from operations to justify it. But they rolled out electricity, and they rolled out PSTN, so the justification was found in those cases.

So, Starlink found a need and filled it. Had governments filled the need instead, the problem wouldn't exist.

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] urfavlaura@lemmy.ml 19 points 2 months ago

elon musk is a terrorist that will make astronomy harder if not impossible if he trashes orbits too much

[-] Cethin@lemmy.zip 14 points 2 months ago

SpaceX is in the business of launching satellites. It's in their best interest if ground-based astronomy gets harder. They should be required to pay for their negative externalities.

[-] Xenny@lemmy.world 14 points 2 months ago

Hahahaha imagine if we made everyone pay for their negative externalities! It would probably be paradise.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] HorseyMD@sh.itjust.works 15 points 2 months ago

Fuck Leon Skum

[-] MalReynolds@slrpnk.net 15 points 2 months ago

Don't worry, greed ensures that Kessler Syndrome will get them in the not too distant future. Sure hope you aren't reliant on GPS or other satellite services, but at least, for a shining moment, shareholders got some value. /s

[-] AA5B@lemmy.world 16 points 2 months ago

Starlink is a very low orbit. Even if something like that happened, it would clean itself up in like five years

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] warm@kbin.earth 10 points 2 months ago

GPS/GLONASS/Galileo are at ~20,000km vs starlinks ~500km, all the LEO satellites would be fucked but global positioning would be fine. Sounds good to me.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] SkyNTP@lemmy.ml 15 points 2 months ago

All worth it so lord Musk can push his shitty memes to remote tribes in the Amazon.

[-] gandalf_der_12te 12 points 2 months ago

Honestly astronomy from earth is notoriously difficult, for various reasons.

  • there's already a lot of light pollution, due to atmospheric light dispersion, so finding a good spot for telescopes is already difficult.
  • there's the issue that images become blurred, again because atmosphere.
  • We already have telescopes in space, why no re-use them with an additional camera?

Spaceflight is unstoppable at this point. I look at the colonization of Mars like a distillation process: we remove all of the restless assholes and billionaires from Earth, and they leave us and leave us the fuck alone. That's a good thing; We should support it.

[-] Cethin@lemmy.zip 30 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Honestly astronomy from space is notoriously difficult, for various reasons.

  • It takes a lot of energy and infrastructure to propel a telescope into space.
  • Radiation can cause issues with electronics, so they all need to be hardened.
  • Typically satellites use older proven technology to make sure that they don't run into new issues, which means they're not able to be bleeding edge.
  • New technology is next to impossible to add to a space telescope, meaning upgrades rarely happen, if ever. Ground telescopes can continuously upgrade with relative ease.

There's a lot of pros and cons. Neither solution is better than the other. They're only better at certain things. We need both.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] CouncilOfFriends@slrpnk.net 15 points 2 months ago

The problem is radio wavelengths are much longer than visible light thus the huge size of radio telescopes on earth, which would also make a space-based one a challenge

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca 12 points 2 months ago

I'm confused because band pass filters exist. Can they not add a filter to eliminate the frequencies that starlink uses?

Also, the starlink satellites use phased array antennas, guess that wasn't a great idea either.

[-] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 33 points 2 months ago

That works great unless you're specifically looking for results in those frequencies.

It's the equivalent of trying to look for a red laser pointer dot on a wall and some jackass put red floodlights in front of you aimed at the wall.

load more comments (9 replies)
[-] dyc3@lemmy.world 25 points 2 months ago

Yes, that completely destroys the information in that band. That is the point, the satellites are using these bands, overpowering what was already naturally there.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 9 points 2 months ago

Alien 1: "I don't get it, we've been trying to contact them for ages now. You don't think they sacrificed their chance to join the interstellar community in order to have better phone reception or something, did they?"

Alien 2: "Well maybe if you didn't keep sticking probes up their asses, they'd be more communicative!"

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 18 Sep 2024
1233 points (100.0% liked)

Microblog Memes

5863 readers
3006 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS