Why Kamala Harris should pick Tim Walz as running mate | Mehdi Hasan (www.theguardian.com)

submitted 3 months ago by Yawweee877h444@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world

11 comments fedilink hide all child comments

top 11 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[-] kmartburrito@lemmy.world 16 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

I think it's great that there are several really great choices here - a stark contrast from the GOP cesspool and their pick of Just Dance Vance.

For me though, my pick is Mark Kelly. Who doesn't absolutely love and admire an astronaut? They have seen some crazy shit, and had to work their asses off to get where they're at. He obviously has way more accolades than just that, but I'm drawn to that one specifically.

That being said, that's just what's in my head, I don't know enough about all of them to really be an expert on each potential pick, and it sounds like each has some really great things to bring to the table.

Whatever choice is made, I doubt we will hear about Dems scrambling to replace them within a couple weeks because they previously called Kamala a deplorable human being or were rumored to fuck couches, lol.

[-] Yawweee877h444@lemmy.world 29 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Everybody likes Kelly it seems. The fact he was an astronaut is cool, but the issues are what matters to me honestly.

Kelly opposes Medicare for all. This is my deal-breaker unfortunately. Opposing Medicare for all is NOT centrist or moderate, it's right of center or a conservative standpoint. Again, my personal deal breaker.

Additionally, he opposes the green new deal, and supported expanding oil drilling.

If he ends up being the choice, I'll be dissapointed but still obviously vote.

[-] trevor 19 points 3 months ago

Yep. He's bad on labor too. Walz and Beshear are much better on policy and are extremely likeable VP candidates.

[-] kmartburrito@lemmy.world 11 points 3 months ago

Thank you for sharing that info!

[-] Bojimbo@lemmy.world 9 points 3 months ago

I'm betting they are going to pick Mark Kelly for the contested state, bipartisan track record and and guaranteed Democrat replacement, but I agree Walz is the better pick.

[-] f1error@thelemmy.club 6 points 3 months ago

As a Minnesotan, I'm going to be selfish, and I hope she doesn't pick him. I want Walz to stay Minnesotas governor, and keep making Minnesota great (even greater than great considering how much Iowa sucks). It's really selfish, as he'd make a great Veep.

[-] frontporchtreat@lemmy.ca 5 points 3 months ago

I just warched Tim Walz presentation at this year's ESRI user conference. To keep it brief he talked about using modern GIS software to solve today's problems. He was absolutely fantastic.

[-] MediaBiasFactChecker@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago

The Guardian Media Bias Fact Check Credibility: [Medium] (Click to view Full Report)

The Guardian is rated with Medium Creditability by Media Bias Fact Check.

Bias: Left-Center
Factual Reporting: Mixed
Country: United Kingdom
Full Report: https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/the-guardian/

Check the bias and credibility of this article on Ground.News:
- https://ground.news/find?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.theguardian.com%2Fcommentisfree%2Farticle%2F2024%2Fjul%2F29%2Fwhy-kamala-harris-should-pick-tim-walz-running-mate%3FCMP%3Dshare_btn_url

Thanks to Media Bias Fact Check for their access to the API.
Please consider supporting them by donating.

Footer

Media Bias Fact Check is a fact-checking website that rates the bias and credibility of news sources. They are known for their comprehensive and detailed reports.

Beep boop. This action was performed automatically. If you dont like me then please block me.💔
If you have any questions or comments about me, you can make a post to LW Support lemmy community.

[-] kikutwo@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

Never heard of him.

[-] sparkle@lemm.ee 1 points 3 months ago

He's one of the most productive progressive leaders in American history

[-] kikutwo@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

Needs a press agent

this post was submitted on 29 Jul 2024

37 points (100.0% liked)

politics

19090 readers

4156 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News