375
submitted 3 months ago by solsangraal@lemmy.zip to c/politics@lemmy.world
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] 8ender@lemmy.world 259 points 3 months ago

Schumer is goading Trump into keeping him. He knows Trump is too prideful to let a Democrat be right about something.

[-] BlackPenguins@lemmy.world 124 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

This is actually a brilliant strategy then. It's a lose-lose.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] cabron_offsets@lemmy.world 126 points 3 months ago

I love how they’re fucking with him. It’s going to cause him to do more silly shit.

[-] MagicShel@programming.dev 83 points 3 months ago

Absolute panic and disarray. I wonder who he would go with. Logically, it would have to be a woman or person of color to counter Harris, right? Would there be anyone who would boost him among pro-Palestinian voters, I wonder?

[-] Gradually_Adjusting@lemmy.world 63 points 3 months ago

I don't think he wants a VP who will strengthen him at all. I think he's too prideful.

[-] billiam0202@lemmy.world 85 points 3 months ago

Vance wasn't picked to complement Trump; he was picked to compliment Trump.

(I wish I could say I was clever enough to have created that.)

[-] dogsnest@lemmy.world 8 points 3 months ago

Thanks for allowing me to take credit.

[-] MagicShel@programming.dev 25 points 3 months ago

I don't think he's beyond a "token DEI hire" who is willing to publicly fellate him if they boost his numbers.

[-] Kraven_the_Hunter@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 3 months ago

That would offer the projection that the GOP is so fond of exhibiting..

[-] TransplantedSconie@lemm.ee 10 points 3 months ago

Maybe that psycho bitch that's running for secretary of state? She's lying like a cheap rug, practicing stolen valor, and breaking election laws.

She's perfect

[-] dogsnest@lemmy.world 8 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

fellate

"What's cuttin' up' a sunfish got to do with Trump?"

-- #maga

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] dhork@lemmy.world 29 points 3 months ago

Would there be anyone who would boost him among pro-Palestinian voters, I wonder?

I doubt it, when Trump is on the record as stating that Netanyahu's main problem is he isn't going fast enough.

Trump, who routinely touts his support of Israel more broadly, has reportedly said he supports Israel in its continued “war on terror” after the October 7 attack by Hamas. And like members of the Israeli government, he has cast doubt on the continued viability of a two-state solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict that has been a cornerstone of US policy for decades.

At times, however, he has also been critical of the Israeli campaign. He’s said Israel should “get it over with … get back to peace and stop killing people.” But he’s also emphasized they “have to have a victory” and implied that what’s really the issue is that Israel is “absolutely losing the PR war” and “losing its power” in Congress.

https://www.vox.com/politics/353037/trump-gaza-israel-protests-biden-election-2024

[-] barsquid@lemmy.world 20 points 3 months ago

Repubs have been campaigning on a platform of bigotry and hatred for decades so I don't see a woman or minority VP happening. Also Donald is personally a bigot and his eggshell ego could not handle the idea of a VP boosting him.

[-] MagicShel@programming.dev 13 points 3 months ago

I don't know that you're wrong, but I'd point out he had Omarosa clinging to him at the beginning of his first term. He doesn't seem above using women or minorities when convenient to make himself look good. He seems to really want the Kanye and rap crowd to love him, as another example.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 19 points 3 months ago

He’s already made his commitments to Netanyahu public. He’d be trying to reclaim the people on the right that he’s lost, not woo voters from the left. I think Haley’s the most likely replacement.

[-] someguy3@lemmy.world 10 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

think Haley’s the most likely replacement.

Have you seen the reaction to Vance's wife? A person of color VP would mean an exodus from maga.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[-] xmunk@sh.itjust.works 17 points 3 months ago

It wouldn't necessarily need to be a PoC or woman but Vance was an extremely weak pick - he's basically just a little uncharismatic sychophant from an electorally unhelpful state. Trump would probably prefer to get a swing state candidate or someone who brings votes to the table.

Weirdly enough, that might actually be Nikki Haley since she captured the "reasonable" side of the party (her policy stances were a fucking train wreck especially on reproductive rights).

[-] CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 22 points 3 months ago

Nikki Haley is not a sychophant though. He learned that lesson with Pence. He wants someone who will worship him and follow his instructions.

Not some "free thinker".

[-] xmunk@sh.itjust.works 10 points 3 months ago

He absolutely wants a sychophant... but not more than he wants presidential immunity and it's not clear if the Supreme Court's bizarre rulings are enough to give it to him without him being elected... right now they're trying but it's pretty clear Democrats want to overturn that.

[-] frezik@midwest.social 9 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

The VP has to be picked by Trump for loyalty first. The person in the position has the ability to Amendment 25 him right out of office on day one. No way he picks Haley for that.

For the same reason, it's surprising he even picked Vance. It may have only happened because Musk and Thiel told Trump to. Then Musk backs out of his funding pledge, and suddenly it's being floated to ditch Vance.

[-] danc4498@lemmy.world 10 points 3 months ago

He’s gonna replace pour man’s Donald Junior with actual Donald Junior.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] kikutwo@lemmy.world 74 points 3 months ago

My Pillow Guy for VP. C'mon it would be so much fun!

[-] mister_flibble@lemm.ee 88 points 3 months ago

Plot twist, that's who Trump was actually trying to get but there was a misunderstanding when he asked for "that guy with the fucking cushions".

[-] ArtVandelay@lemmy.world 27 points 3 months ago

"i said fucking cushions, not cushion fucker!"

[-] zib@lemmy.world 17 points 3 months ago

Hell yeah, that would be hilarious. Mike Lindell, the Jesse Ventura we have at home.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] the_post_of_tom_joad@sh.itjust.works 10 points 3 months ago

Couch-fucker to That Pillow Fucker.. Yes i like this timeline

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] driving_crooner@lemmy.eco.br 55 points 3 months ago

I think everyone forgot how fast the Trump team rotated during his government (what was the name of that guy that lasted 10 days? Moochie?) in comparison to Biden's government, where AFAIK, there's haven't been a lot of changes on his team.

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 36 points 3 months ago

And if he replaces couchfucker, he'll remind everyone of how unstable a Trump presidency is.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] MisterNeon@lemmy.world 19 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Anthony Scaramucci: My favorite slimeball. Saw the other CHUDs in the Trump administration and then bounced after eleven days after realizing that "the juice ain't worth the squeeze". I wouldn't turn my back on him, but I would trust him over all other Trump world alumni since he has enough self preservation not to burn the world around him.

Edit: He had an unhinged interview with a reporter and was dismissed a couple days after. Go listen to the audio; I'm laughing so god damn hard at it.

[-] driving_crooner@lemmy.eco.br 11 points 3 months ago

Wasn't he fired after an unhinged cocaine infused interview?

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] synae@lemmy.sdf.org 16 points 3 months ago

NOTE: Moochie died on the way back to his home planet

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] frezik@midwest.social 49 points 3 months ago

Replacing Vance now would also undermine any argument they might make about switching the names on ballots for the Democrats. Those aren't valid, anyway--Biden wasn't the official nominee until the convention says so; nothing was locked in--but they would now lose the possibility of using it rhetorically.

[-] Hegar@fedia.io 41 points 3 months ago

they would now lose the possibility of using it rhetorically.

I think you're over-estimating their commitment to logic, consistency or reality.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] solsangraal@lemmy.zip 18 points 3 months ago

never interrupt the enemy when he's making a mistake

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] LEDZeppelin@lemmy.world 31 points 3 months ago

Kamala should sue RNC for “undermining the will of the people” in every fucking state. Litigate that shit until the last second before polls close

[-] xmunk@sh.itjust.works 10 points 3 months ago

No, that'd almost certainly be a tactical mistake since it'd lend enough credibility to the claim to get those cases to the Supreme Court and then they'd just rule in favor of Trump in all circumstances... it'd be hard to overrule the court in a situation like that with a deadline for picking an executive and the Supreme Court has shown it's now gloves off crazy mode... no more "we're independent jurists".

[-] todd_bonzalez@lemm.ee 26 points 3 months ago

Trump's communications director, Steven Cheung, denied the reports in a statement to Newsweek on Tuesday, "President Trump is thrilled with the choice he made with Senator Vance, and they are the perfect team to take back the White House. And any reporting to the contrary is nothing but ridiculous fake news from either nonexistent sources or individuals who have no idea what's going on.

Saving this quote for when Trump replaces Vance.

[-] solsangraal@lemmy.zip 8 points 3 months ago

that cheung dude is hilarious. it's like exactly what trump would say except at twice the writing proficiency. so 6th grade level instead of 3rd grade

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] solsangraal@lemmy.zip 24 points 3 months ago

couchfucker

[-] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 23 points 3 months ago

I think the funny part is that he's hated by both sides. A new Ted Cruz.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] OhStopYellingAtMe@lemmy.world 16 points 3 months ago

…and the same people who call the Democratic Party “chaotic” for replacing Biden with Kamala will have no problem shifting gears to adore whatever wretched troll they scrounge up to replace Vance.

[-] just_another_person@lemmy.world 16 points 3 months ago

Can't wait for Trump to come out and say his campaign should be reimbursed for all dumbass merch they had made as well. What a clownshow.

[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 15 points 3 months ago

Hey, with all this talk of unity and how the Democrats should be picking a Republican to run on some kind of centrist wet-dream ticket, how about the "liberal media" starts beating the drum for donnie to kick JD off the ticket and add someone like AOC to the ticket?

You know: for "unity". For the tone - the Republicans should be utterly capitulating to the Democratic Party.

Why does no one in the corporate media ever suggest it is the Republican Party that should cave to the leftist majority in this country, but instead, the reverse is something that comes up. All. The. Time.

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 13 points 3 months ago

So I'm hearing that Harris' VP announcement will be in 11 days.

[-] jordanlund@lemmy.world 17 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Democratic convention is 8/19 to 8/22.

I expect the announcement on or just before the 19th. So 20-21 days.

Floor speech from the VP candidate on the 21st. Harris on the 22nd.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] jordanlund@lemmy.world 10 points 3 months ago

It's clear Trump picked Vance to counter Harris, so if she's no longer the VP side of the ticket, Vance is literally pointless. Ohio was going to vote Trump regardless, Vance doesn't bring any added votes that way.

He needs to wait and see who Harris picks as V.P. though.

[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 10 points 3 months ago

Is it because of all the couch fuckin'?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 29 Jul 2024
375 points (100.0% liked)

politics

19096 readers
3512 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS