702
submitted 5 months ago by mox@lemmy.sdf.org to c/news@lemmy.world

Paywall-free link: https://archive.ph/eGuHC

all 41 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Shadow@lemmy.ca 127 points 5 months ago
[-] errer@lemmy.world 21 points 5 months ago

Only took 20 fucking years…

[-] Jimmyeatsausage@lemmy.world 87 points 5 months ago

Queue Justice Thomas being seen, coincidentally, attending a large number of concerts with long-time friends on the Ticketmaster board...

[-] xmunk@sh.itjust.works 72 points 5 months ago

Time to grab a 25 dollar bucket of popcorn from the refreshments stand and watch the fireworks from my 300 dollar chair right behind a support pillar.

[-] muse@kbin.social 18 points 5 months ago

Yeah and after we leave the movie theater we'll go to a concert, so save up!

[-] IamSparticles@lemmy.zip 1 points 5 months ago

Hang on, let me check my credit rating.

[-] Gerudo@lemm.ee 65 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

I think this is great.

What is really needed is the end of monopoly on the venues. As long as that is in place, this won't do much for ticket prices.

[-] scytale@lemm.ee 29 points 5 months ago

Even just removing dynamic pricing, prohibiting ticket resales from going above original price, and removing extra fees (for upgrades and resales) will solve most of the issues.

[-] Gerudo@lemm.ee 37 points 5 months ago

I get it, but if they own the major venues in every town...they can still set their own prices.

The ticket companies shouldn't have ownership of the venue.

Pearl Jam fought them for years but had to stop because they owned every stadium and large venue, and that was 30+ years ago when they were just one company.

[-] Rekhyt@lemmy.world 8 points 5 months ago

It's literally the same breakup that happened with movie studios owning theaters in 1948. It's emblematic of the state of antitrust in the past decades that we've let another industry get away with the exact same issue thing.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Paramount_Pictures,_Inc.

[-] TachyonTele@lemm.ee 1 points 5 months ago

Yup. Concert venues and streaming are in the same position movie theaters were in back then.

[-] jumjummy@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago

The streaming vertical integration really irks me. Say what you will about the music industry, but at least I only have to pay for ONE streaming platform to enjoy pretty much any song I want.

[-] kent_eh@lemmy.ca 4 points 5 months ago

if they own the major venues in every town

When you say "own" in this context, do you mean they actually bought the building, or just that they have an exclusive contract with the venue?

[-] You999@sh.itjust.works 4 points 5 months ago

Both. Live nation either owns the venue or has an exclusive contract with the venue. If you run a venue and you do not parter with live nation they will run you out of business.

[-] You999@sh.itjust.works 3 points 5 months ago

One of my hobbies is hosting raves and I've heard a lot of stories from venue owners about live nation/ticket master. They work a lot like the mafia where if you don't accept their terms they will do everything in their power to shut you down. They will do stuff like scheduling large names shows to conflict with your key events while also 'influencing' the local officials to pull your liquid license. I 100% agree that they should be broken up but I would go a step further and also split off their promoter sector that way ticketing, venues, and events are all separate entities that cannot completely control the market.

[-] Granite@kbin.social 58 points 5 months ago

They’re why I don’t go to concerts. But we shall see.

[-] 0110010001100010@lemmy.world 26 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Same, they are an absolutely horrible company. Far beyond the "normal" late-stage capitalism we see with other companies.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 7 points 5 months ago

I've never been to a rock concert because I've heard precisely one story from someone who truly had a great time compared to what they might have had in a smaller venue and that was because they had good seats.

If the amount of enjoyment you're going to get out of a band is directly proportional to how much you're willing to pay, fuck that.

[-] Psychodelic@lemmy.world 6 points 5 months ago

Is it really? Or do you just not like attending live events?

I've been to so many shows I can't even imagine letting a shitty corporation stand in the way of something I enjoy so much.

[-] Granite@kbin.social 7 points 5 months ago

I’ve moped out of buying tickets for bands I’ve really wanted to see because of Ticketmaster’s fees and bullshit on their website.

[-] Psychodelic@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Shit, sorry I asked. Not sure how in the world that was offensive to y'all

[-] Buddahriffic@lemmy.world 4 points 5 months ago

You basically accused someone who was willing to sacrifice their love of concerts to stand against an abusive monopoly by withdrawing from the market entirely of not actually caring about concerts and just posting a lie for internet attention.

And, in the same breath, you admitted to being one of the ones who sucks it up and enables Ticketmaster to continue following their abusive business model. Not that you're a bad person for this, it's just frustrating because it means the boycott is in vain, at least to some degree.

And personally, I'm tired of people responding to reasonably plausible comments as if they are unbelievable. Even if they are lying, do you expect an admission.

While your comment wasn't particularly aggressive about any of those above points, it is about something that a bunch of people feel strongly about, so they might have a lower threshold to get upset about it.

And finally, Lemmy's population contains many who are here because they did take that step and cut out Reddit when they decided Reddit was becoming bad enough that they didn't want to support it. And Reddit isn't anywhere close to as bad as Ticketmaster, though tbf visiting Reddit isn't anywhere close to as enjoyable as a concert so it was an easier sacrifice.

Tone here was intended to be neutral btw. Not trying to lecture or patronize but just comment on why I didn't like that comment.

[-] Psychodelic@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago

Thanks for the response. I appreciate it. I don't necessarily agree with your POV, obviously, but I do sincerely appreciate the explanation.

That said, if you think that was neutral, you need a bit of work on your communication skills. Most people would just tell someone speaking to them like that to fuck off. I began writing a reply but I don't really think it makes sense to continue the dialogue. I doubt you really care what I think anyway, and that's totally fine. We can agree to disagree.

[-] absquatulate@lemmy.world 38 points 5 months ago

Gotta say, I'm not terribly hopeful about this.

"The cattle ranchers are in charge, Coop"

[-] JIMMERZ@lemm.ee 35 points 5 months ago

So Pearl Jam isn’t just a dumb group of kids that know nothing?

[-] Crack0n7uesday@lemmy.world 8 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

They got Taylor Swift on their side after the last Eras tour fiasco.

[-] phoneymouse@lemmy.world 31 points 5 months ago

How the fuck were they even allowed to merge? It’s the definition of a god damn monopoly.

[-] refurbishedrefurbisher@lemmy.sdf.org 13 points 5 months ago

Politicians and justices are bought by the same corporations who are becoming monopolies.

[-] Asafum@feddit.nl 2 points 5 months ago

And the best part about it is that the people getting bribes are the ones who get to decide if getting bribes is ok!

Totally Not A Broken System!™

(Fuck you goddamn naive founding fathers. Integrity died like 100 years ago yet our entire government depends on people having it...)

Don't worry. The country is going to start it's death rattle in about a year when fascism takes over due to the wealthy prefering fascism over any semblence of socialism.

[-] Theharpyeagle@lemmy.world 7 points 5 months ago

Other than pure corruption, there's a lot of issues with plain old tech illiteracy. Going to bat against a legal team specifically trained to talk circles around aging justices and politicians is a real losing formula. This was on full display during the Cambridge Analytica trial.

[-] barsquid@lemmy.world 4 points 5 months ago

It turns out you can choose whatever laws you want if you give a few tens of thousands to some Congressmen or an RV to Clarence Thomas.

[-] vk6flab@lemmy.radio 21 points 5 months ago

Yeah, I'll believe it after it's done. I'm not expecting progress in my lifetime.

[-] xmunk@sh.itjust.works 17 points 5 months ago

Hey, we've gotten a series of pretty big wins from Lina Khan - yea, a lot of shit is broken and it'll take a while to fix it... but some people really are trying.

[-] rockSlayer@lemmy.world 18 points 5 months ago

Yet again, the swifties take a win. Those fans are a force of nature.

[-] DoucheBagMcSwag@lemmy.dbzer0.com 19 points 5 months ago

They better come out and vote in ROEvember as well

[-] roguetrick@lemmy.world 15 points 5 months ago

I think Congress would have to pass regulation to see any improvement and a reasonable level of competition. If this breakup just results in regional monopolies instead of national ones with the same exclusionary contracts with venues, it'll result in a distinction without a difference.

Yes, obviously they broke the settlement that allowed the merger in the first place r.e. exclusionary contracts, but if they break up the company, they'll be allowing the successor companies to set up exclusionary contracts themselves.

[-] PrincessLeiasCat@sh.itjust.works 11 points 5 months ago

Now do Google, Amazon, FB, etc.

[-] ThirdWorldOrder@lemm.ee 10 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

They mention every company you listed in the article…

“Biden’s Justice Department has already filed twin monopolization cases against Google and in March sued Apple Inc. for allegedly thwarting innovation on its iPhone. The Federal Trade Commission, which jointly enforces the antitrust laws, is seeking to force Meta Platforms Inc. to sell off its Instagram and WhatsApp units and sued Amazon last year for monopolization of online marketplace services.”

[-] PrincessLeiasCat@sh.itjust.works 2 points 5 months ago

This is helpful, thank you. I was only able to read the first paragraph or so before it cut out and said I needed to make an account, so I just stopped there.

this post was submitted on 23 May 2024
702 points (100.0% liked)

News

23301 readers
2953 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS