153
submitted 6 months ago by rimu@piefed.social to c/politics@lemmy.world

Paywall free version

A study of 5.6mn courses at nearly 4,000 higher education institutions by Open Syllabus, a non-profit group, shows just 0.08 per cent mention critical race theory (CRT), structural racism, systemic racism or diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI). The share is also very low for other sensitive topics including transgender issues, as well as for related textbooks. The figures cast doubt on the intensifying “anti-woke” criticism of US education by right-wing Republicans, etc

It's almost like it was all a fabrication to manufacture outrage.

top 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] itsgroundhogdayagain@lemmy.ml 79 points 6 months ago

People who talk about "wokeness" will not be detered by your facts.

[-] NateNate60@lemmy.world 10 points 6 months ago

Speaking as a university student, this aligns with what I've experienced in an American university. Most classes, however, are about technical subjects completely unrelated to the social concepts in question.

However, I believe part of the reason people think universities are "woke" (and I use this term in its original meaning of "aware of social problems affecting others") is because a greater proportion of the classes that everyone is required to take will mention and discuss those concepts. Where I'm studying, this is known as the baccalaureate core and everyone must take courses with certain attributes to graduate, which includes a large number of classes discussing systemic racism, difference, power and discrimination, and other similar topics.

It's not a large percentage of the total number of classes offered by the university, but they are much more likely to be attended by students.

[-] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 16 points 6 months ago

University tends to teach people critical thinking skills. This will often lead them to reject counterfactual claims made by radical ideologies. So obviously the people promoting those radical ideologies will not like that.

[-] RGB3x3@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

This was me. Not that I was racist in any way, but I was brought up with a father that absolutely did not (still does not) think that systemic racism existed, that wokeness was damaging, really that any issues the left focused on were mindless and stupid and damaging.

I went into my first sociology class with that kind of mindset, and the moment I actually started doing research for papers, I realized how wrong I was.

Really the only people who rail against "woke" education are the ones who haven't gone to college (my dad) or those making money and power from the grift.

[-] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago

Oh dear, looks like you caught the woke mind virus! Because that is basically what it is.

That was not my experience. The classes I was required to take were technical in nature. While I was required to take electives, these could be pretty much anything from computer science to English to foreign policy. The only power dynamics I studied were between nation states.

[-] Commiunism@lemmy.wtf 8 points 6 months ago

Obviously this study was done by people who are part of the far-left liberal establishment and are lying /s

But seriously, I doubt that people who buy into anti-woke rhetoric are going to care, they're stuck in this "us vs them" bubble that's incredibly difficult to escape from.

[-] Carrolade@lemmy.world 7 points 6 months ago

A fabrication to manufacture outrage? But ... who would possibly be willing to do something like that?

[-] Silverseren@kbin.social 6 points 6 months ago

Why would any of these be mentioned in practically any class outside of some law and education courses?

[-] MichaelTen@lemm.ee 2 points 6 months ago

Was this qualitative? Or how was wokeness quantified and who or whom chose the operational definition?

[-] Cosmicomical@lemmy.world 9 points 6 months ago

What they mean by woke is clearly stated even in this post.

this post was submitted on 19 May 2024
153 points (100.0% liked)

politics

19104 readers
2194 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS