125
submitted 1 year ago by spaduf to c/politics@lemmy.world
top 40 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Duder167@lemmy.world 47 points 1 year ago

I can usually spot the stream of drool a few yards out.

[-] Tedesche@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago

While I differ from conservatives on most issues, I actually agree with them on some aspects of the gender war. Feminism does demonize men in its efforts to champion women sometimes, and it’s been a rather frustrating and depressing experience to see that most liberals seem totally blind to what I see as superficially subtle, but very clear signs in popular media and politics. As examples, I’d point to the recent Barbie film, which portrays men as buffoonish caricatures of patriarchal stereotypes a perhaps a bit dated moment in politics from a decade back, wherein Barrack Obama celebrated in a speech women making up 60% of college graduates.

I obviously won’t be voting Republican, but I really do hope the Left reigns in the misandry and finds a way to advocate for women without shitting on men.

[-] whiskeypickle@lemmy.ml 21 points 1 year ago

oh, look-- it works!

[-] art@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago

the recent Barbie film, which portrays men as buffoonish caricatures

If there's one thing men hate, it's being funny in comedy movies.

[-] MossBear@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago

On the flip side of things, we have nearly a century of movies treating women as largely useless, fragile creatures who don't do anything of importance, so let's balance that on the scales while we're at it perhaps.

[-] Tedesche@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Demonizing men doesn't help women. I'm all for addressing women's issues, including how they're represented in popular media, but representing men poorly is a totally unnecessary part of that. Do you think the solution to the legacy of slavery is for Blacks to enslave Whites for 150 years? To balance the scales? What a bullshit notion.

[-] MossBear@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

Nope, you're reaching. Should every man in every move and show be represented in an idealized way at all times? How do you even remotely judge what's a character (which is to say an individual) being portrayed in a particular way versus all men, everywhere being "demonized" as you put it?

[-] Tedesche@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Virtually every male character in that film is portrayed negatively, and the feminist messaging is very clear. I’d say that qualifies as demonizing.

[-] MossBear@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

What does negatively mean in this context? What are some examples? I haven't seem the movie.

[-] Tedesche@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

Here's a decent enough summary of the plot. The film depicts all the Kens as idiotic, shallow, patriarchy-loving simpletons who are dependent on their Barbie counterparts and many men in the Real World as misogynistic assholes.

[-] MossBear@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

I could see how for some women that would be a not entirely unrealistic experience of the men in their lives. Especially if they were raised in more conservative states. Even to the extent that it may not be ideal (and I'm assuming it's not being mischaracterized here), it seems like such a minor thing. How many cultural war battles have come and gone and been forgotten without the culture actually changing in any significant way? I'd wager a fair number.

[-] Tedesche@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Okay, I'm pretty sure you just willfully don't want to see my point, so I'm going to bid this thread adieu.

[-] MossBear@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

I see it, I just don't think it's as significant or important as you do.

[-] btaf45@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

I knew their was a reason I didn't want to see that movie. I just didn't know what it was until now.

[-] Synthead@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

This identifies two problems, and doesn't negate the original problem (two wrongs make a right fallacy). Let's work to fix both problems.

[-] MossBear@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Let's put more of our time and effort into fixing the problem which has existed in some form for all of human history and then whatever time and energy we have left over can go to working on the present blip related to the Barbie movie.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

It's a movie.

[-] BrooklynMan@lemmy.ml 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

the term "satire" is begging your acquaintance

[-] SeducingCamel@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago

Yeah you're right, women aren't doing their movement right, they should let men do it for them since they'll do it right

[-] Tedesche@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

If it's being run by people like you, who can't even read a civil comment on the internet and respond in a civil fashion, I think it's doomed no matter what gender you are.

[-] MlemOfficial@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago

oh, look, it works!

[-] btaf45@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Conservative's chief flaw is their love of dishonesty and contempt for honesty. Liberal's chief flaw is that they sometimes point the outrage machine at the wrong target.

[-] irkli@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

This story is a long read, and until section 5, won't seem appropriate to OPs post.

Not sure I agree with all of the conclusions, but wow there's a lot of good observations in here!

https://medium.com/@DaleBeran/4chan-the-skeleton-key-to-the-rise-of-trump-624e7cb798cb

this post was submitted on 24 Jul 2023
125 points (100.0% liked)

politics

18894 readers
2911 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS