484
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] slumlordthanatos@lemmy.world 56 points 3 months ago

It's actually kinda funny watching them flail around blaming nothing and everything because one of their own tried to shoot Trump. They were NOT prepared to deal with this situation at all.

[-] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 13 points 3 months ago

Has more been confirmed other than last voter registration?

[-] todd_bonzalez@lemm.ee 21 points 3 months ago

What additional evidence do you need? He was asked directly by the state what party he considers himself a supporter of, and he said Republican.

Conservatives are going to try to disown him no matter what. Don't let their endless bad faith requests for additional proof convince you that the facts here aren't straightforward.

[-] Fuzzy_Red_Panda@lemm.ee 2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

No no no. Voter party affiliation on voter registration doesn't mean anything on its own. People change their registered parties all the time to vote in the other party's primaries and such. Also sometimes people forget to switch back.

For kids, their party affiliation is going to be whatever their parents are (lest they be disowned by their family). For kids, their political views can and do change radically from 18 to 25.

Party affiliation on voter registration means nothing in the case of the shooter.

[-] todd_bonzalez@lemm.ee 3 points 3 months ago

kids

...

18 to 25

I don't think you know what a kid is...

[-] Fuzzy_Red_Panda@lemm.ee 3 points 3 months ago

Fine, young adult, whatever. My point still stands. Young new voters are most likely to be registered with the same party affiliation as their parents. It doesn't mean the shooter is actually a republican.

[-] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 14 points 3 months ago

If nothing gets released (like very little was released about the mini-arsenal, bump-stock Las Vegas mass shooter) he’s probably right wing. If there’s anything leftist about it you can bet they’ll dig for every possible way to exploit it.

[-] MagicShel@programming.dev 12 points 3 months ago

We may never be able to put him on so narrow a box, but he was registered, a gun nut, and he didn't donate to Dems - that was just someone with the same name in the same state.

That's not confirmation, but thus far there isn't any reason to believe otherwise.

But also he was 20. It's likely he didn't have a strong personal affiliation with any political party.

[-] octopus_ink@lemmy.ml 9 points 3 months ago

Not in any way that will convince someone who doesn't want to believe it, but for reasonable folks...

https://www.thedailybeast.com/trump-rally-gunman-thomas-crooks-was-definitely-conservative-classmate-recalls

Smith shared an American history class with Crooks, and remembered a mock debate where their teacher made students stand on one side of the classroom or another to signal their allegiance. “The majority of the class were on the liberal side, but Tom, no matter what, always stood his ground on the conservative side,” Smith said. “That’s still the picture I have of him. Just standing alone on one side while the rest of the class was on the other.”

[-] Fuzzy_Red_Panda@lemm.ee 4 points 3 months ago

This was years ago. Kids change really quickly as they grow up. Ask me how I know. I used to be a kid in high school who was spouting my parents' bullshit conservative christian views. After high school I started thinking for myself and left all that toxic garbage behind.

[-] octopus_ink@lemmy.ml 4 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

I'll use that counterargument the next time someone brings up how he donated $15 to pacblue when he was 15 to convince me he's a crazy left wing antifa whackjob or similar. Edit: Apparently that donation has been debunked anyhow. So on the balance of available evidence...

this post was submitted on 14 Jul 2024
484 points (100.0% liked)

politics

19159 readers
3951 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS