388

Over the weekend, the allegations returned to the fore, and for good reason. The New York Times reported on Saturday:

John F. Kelly, who served as former President Donald J. Trump’s second White House chief of staff, said in a sworn statement that Mr. Trump had discussed having the Internal Revenue Service and other federal agencies investigate two F.B.I. officials involved in the investigation into his campaign’s ties to Russia. Mr. Kelly said that his recollection of Mr. Trump’s comments to him was based on notes that he had taken at the time in 2018. Mr. Kelly provided copies of his notes to lawyers for one of the F.B.I. officials, who made the sworn statement public in a court filing.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Aesthesiaphilia@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

Literally did not say that, nice try tho

but like, hasn't he committed multiple felonies that generally do end up with people in jail?

I'm take that seriously when the GOP starts complaining about all the other rich people who regularly do shit like this and face no consequences.

You’re taking Democratic corruption seriously only after Republicans eliminate their corruption. You are a defender and champion of corruption, just as long as it’s people in your party.

The fact that you think that’s different from partisan corruption basically everywhere is laughable.

Are you a child? I try not to get into arguments with children.

but like, hasn't he committed multiple felonies that generally do end up with people in jail?

I'm take that seriously when the GOP starts complaining about all the other rich people who regularly do shit like this and face no consequences.

You’re taking Democratic corruption seriously only after Republicans eliminate their corruption. You are a defender and champion of corruption, just as long as it’s people in your party.

The fact that you think that’s different from partisan corruption basically everywhere is laughable.

Are you a child? I try not to get into arguments with children.

[-] Aesthesiaphilia@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

I'm not referring to the corruption itself. I'm just not taking your words or your concern seriously. I don't think you actually care about corruption. All you care about is making Democrats look bad.

I'll take your words seriously after you start dealing with corruption in your own party.

Anyway, you probably understood all that, you're just intentionally misconstruing my words in a poor attempt to make democrats look bad, because that's all you people can ever do. It's your whole party platform. That and oppressing minorities.

[-] AngrilyEatingMuffins@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Oh fuck off

The persecution complex that both parties have inculcated is fucking ridiculous. I say, “fuck the GOP” I say reps are more corrupt than dems and you’re out here with the, “you only complain about democratic corruption bc you hate democrats.”

People like you on both sides of the aisle are why the rich are looting this country. Wake the fuck up you simple bitch.

Straight up just calling me a Republican. The idea that people can just be principled and against partisan hackery and corruption is just to alien for your pea brain to fathom, huh?

[-] Aesthesiaphilia@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

Nice try, shill. We all got wise to your bullshit after 2016. "muh both sides" lol

Please go back to Reddit where you can exist with oblivious milquetoast lukewarm liberals like yourself.

I’ve been a committed leftist since I was a teenager but go off with your impeccable sixth sense of dipshit tomfuckery. Bet you like James Carville lmaoooo

Oh and I just wanted to point out that you’re so thoroughly propagandized to supporting your team’s corruption that you literally invented a person and twisted an argument to justify the fact that you approve of blatant systemic corruption.

Get bent, dickweed. Thanks for teaching me brain worms aren’t ideologically specific, I guess.

this post was submitted on 10 Jul 2023
388 points (100.0% liked)

politics

19144 readers
4280 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS