894
Education (lemmy.dbzer0.com)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] SupraMario@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago

And in a communist society, the candy belongs to everyone in the neighborhood, so they have to go around passing it out until it's equally distributed...

[-] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 15 points 6 months ago

Communism isn't about equal distribution. Communism is about addressing everyone's needs from everyone's collective abilities.

[-] SupraMario@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago
[-] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 19 points 6 months ago

The collective. Democratic processes and councils.

[-] SupraMario@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago

Lol so people who you elected, just like the system we have now.

[-] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 3 points 6 months ago

Not at all, Capitalism would be abolished.

[-] SupraMario@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago

So you're back to a committee telling people what they need to do and how much they get, just without the freedom to change jobs...got it.

[-] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 3 points 6 months ago

Where did I say you couldn't change jobs or decide what to do?

[-] SupraMario@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago

You're committee did, or if they didn't then they're just gov bosses over everyone since they dictate what people are worth. So you're back at capitalism...just with a voted in committee telling people their worth, or we're talking about a committee that dictates what people are going to do. Which is it?

[-] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 3 points 6 months ago

You don't seem to understand basic concepts of democracy, Capitalism, or Socialism.

Workers democratically deciding policy and electing leaders is fundamentally different from Capitalism, where they have no say over production, nor what they are worth.

[-] SupraMario@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago

I don't, you all do. The majority will always overrule the minority and you will have leadership that represents some but not all. Someone is going to get screwed always in your little utopia.

[-] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 2 points 6 months ago

Having democratically accountable managers and production based on use and not on profit is entirely different.

[-] SupraMario@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago

Yeah it's even worse...if you don't like your boss you have no option of moving to a different job to get rid of them. The same people you all hate in this government are the same people who will now be bossing you around.

[-] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 2 points 6 months ago

You can vote them out, lol.

You're deeply unserious.

[-] SupraMario@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago

How's that currently working for you? RvW was just repealed and anti-abortion laws in place in a bunch of states....

[-] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 2 points 6 months ago

Yep, the US is not a democracy.

[-] SupraMario@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago

And you think a communist society is?

[-] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 2 points 6 months ago
[-] SupraMario@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago

ROFL The delusional naivety from you tankies is hilarious.

[-] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 1 points 6 months ago

What makes me a tankie? Being a non-anarchist Socialist? Tankie must've lost all meaning, then.

[-] nautilus@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 6 months ago

ah yes, the classic room temperature IQ dunk

[-] SupraMario@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago

Yes because your comment has totally provided a ton of rebuttal.

[-] luciferofastora@lemmy.zip 1 points 6 months ago

No, the buckets would be communally owned, and those who were luckier - perhaps they got to the good houses earlier - would be made to give some of their surplus to Jimmy, who fell ill just that morning and couldn't go trick-or-treating to not infect others. They'd still have enough, but Jimmy wouldn't be left out just because he was unlucky.

[-] SupraMario@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago

So how does that work for real life? You going to cut off a bedroom and give it to jimmy? Or give him one of your cars?

[-] luciferofastora@lemmy.zip 3 points 6 months ago

I don't even have a car, because I can't afford one, nor do I have a spare bedroom because I live in a small apartment, paying a chunk of my monthly earnings to a person whose only contribution is having a piece of paper that says they're allowed to charge for the fundament necessity of having a place to live.

My neighbour has a big house, three cars in their driveway and most of the time, at least two of them are standing around unused. He probably could afford to share. That's the meaning of "everyone, according to their needs" - that guy most likely doesn't need as much as he has, so it won't hurt him to give some away to people that do need it.

But the issue isn't him having something nice. He can have his house for all I care. I want him to have a nice house. I want Jimmy to have a nice house, and you too! I want all of us to have nice things, because a bit of luxury isn't the problem, and covering a symptom won't cure the disease. And the disease is the belief that property rights matter more than human welfare.

You wouldn't achieve anything by taking a little from those that have a little more than the rest. You'd have to take away the systems that constrain us.

There's an empty flat? Great, let's give it to Jimmy! What do you mean, if he can afford the rent? Man needs a place to live, for fuck's sake. Jimmy needs medical care? Get him to a doctor. The community carries the cost, because we all would want the same if we needed care.

How do we reach that? That's a tough one. Eventually, a concerted effort to uproot that system will have to take place. I'm not positive that'll succeed on ballots alone and as has become increasingly evident, peaceful protests tend to meet violence all the same.

But whether through coordinated civil action like protests and disobedience or through outright revolution, awareness is the first step. Informing people of the injustice done to us all, that it doesn't have to be this way, and that together, we're strong enough to change it.

The only people that don't profit from it are the ruthlessly selfish ones that think "I'd rather have a second car than let someone else have one" is a reasonable sentiment.

Because yes, if I had a car I didn't need, and Jimmy needed it, I'd let him use it. What good would it do standing around?

this post was submitted on 17 May 2024
894 points (100.0% liked)

Lefty Memes

4350 readers
427 users here now

An international (English speaking) socialist Lemmy community free of the "ML" influence of instances like lemmy.ml and lemmygrad. This is a place for undogmatic shitposting and memes from a progressive, anti-capitalist and truly anti-imperialist perspective, regardless of specific ideology.

Serious posts, news, and discussion go in c/Socialism.

If you are new to socialism, you can ask questions and find resources over on c/Socialism101.

Please don't forget to help keep this community clean by reporting rule violations, updooting good contributions and downdooting those of low-quality!

Rules

Version without spoilers

0. Only post socialist memes


That refers to funny image macros and means that generally videos and screenshots are not allowed. Exceptions include explicitly humorous and short videos, as well as (social media) screenshots depicting a funny situation, joke, or joke picture relating to socialist movements, theory, societal issues, or political opponents. Examples would be the classic case of humorous Tumblr or Twitter posts/threads. (and no, agitprop text does not count as a meme)


1. Socialist Unity in the form of mutual respect and good faith interactions is enforced here


Try to keep an open mind, other schools of thought may offer points of view and analyses you haven't considered yet. Also: This is not a place for the Idealism vs. Materialism or rather Anarchism vs. Marxism debate(s), for that please visit c/AnarchismVsMarxism.


2. Anti-Imperialism means recognizing capitalist states like Russia and China as such


That means condemning (their) imperialism, even if it is of the "anti-USA" flavor.


3. No liberalism, (right-wing) revisionism or reactionaries.


That includes so called: Social Democracy, Democratic Socialism, Dengism, Market Socialism, Patriotic Socialism, National Bolshevism, Anarcho-Capitalism etc. . Anti-Socialist people and content have no place here, as well as the variety of "Marxist"-"Leninists" seen on lemmygrad and more specifically GenZedong (actual ML's are welcome as long as they agree to the rules and don't just copy paste/larp about stuff from a hundred years ago).


4. No Bigotry.


The only dangerous minority is the rich.


5. Don't demonize previous and current socialist experiments or (leading) individuals.


We must constructively learn from their mistakes, while acknowledging their achievements and recognizing when they have strayed away from socialist principles.

(if you are reading the rules to apply for modding this community, mention "Mantic Minotaur" when answering question 2)


6. Don't idolize/glorify previous and current socialist experiments or (leading) individuals.


Notable achievements in all spheres of society were made by various socialist/people's/democratic republics around the world. Mistakes, however, were made as well: bureaucratic castes of parasitic elites - as well as reactionary cults of personality - were established, many things were mismanaged and prejudice and bigotry sometimes replaced internationalism and progressiveness.



  1. Absolutely no posts or comments meant to relativize(/apologize for), advocate, promote or defend:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS