976
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Timecircleline@sh.itjust.works 14 points 5 months ago

My understanding is the goal of chemo for animals is to keep the drugs at a low enough level that any symptoms they have from them are less impactful than the symptoms they have from the cancer. I understand it's also less effective, for this reason- but it wouldn't be fair to make them sick because they don't understand.

[-] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 14 points 5 months ago

I feel like the chemo would only be to prolong their life for the benefit of the owners and not of the animal.

[-] MedicPigBabySaver@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago

Yes. It's absurd how much $$ some people will spend on their pets. Especially when the vast majority of pets are not money makers, eg: breeding, show winners.

[-] Bo7a@lemmy.ca 15 points 5 months ago

I too only value people, animals, and things, for the monetary returns they bring in.

No wait, that's not true, because I'm not a fucking psychopath.

[-] MedicPigBabySaver@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago

You can still change your ways and keep that $$.

[-] Bo7a@lemmy.ca 7 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

You sound like a slave stockpiling brownie points with your master instead of realizing the yoke around your neck.

Enjoy that. I guess.

[-] MedicPigBabySaver@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Nope. Just don't waste my $$. For less, people can adopt a new pet. There are tons waiting in shelters.

I've seen plenty of dogs and cats that were long past their quality of life. Selfish prick owners.

[-] Ajen@sh.itjust.works 4 points 5 months ago

I’ve seen plenty of dogs and cats that were long past their quality of life.

OK, but that's not what people are arguing with you about. I don't think people would disagree with you if you were only talking about spending money on pets to extend their lives without making them happy/comfortable. But there are a lot of instances where you can increase your pets lifespan without losing any quality of life. Sometimes that's expensive, and it can be a really hard choice to make (especially if you have trouble affording it), but it sounds like you're arguing that people shouldn't spend a lot of money on their pets no matter what. That's absurd.

[-] MedicPigBabySaver@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago

If you spend thousands for a hip replacement for your dog. You're an idiot.

Same with other expensive "quality of life" procedures.

Go get another friggin' dog.

[-] Ajen@sh.itjust.works 6 points 5 months ago

Go get another friggin' dog.

Some people love their pets. Sounds like you just can't understand that.

[-] MedicPigBabySaver@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago

I love my cat. And I'll love the next one once she's ill/injured and it's time to cross the "rainbow bridge".

[-] Ajen@sh.itjust.works 4 points 5 months ago

If you really love your cat, why do you think it's wrong to spend money to prolong her life? Assuming it doesn't involve suffering on her part, of course.

[-] MedicPigBabySaver@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago

I feed her. That's the maximum expenditure. Not even yearly visits to the vet. She's an animal. There are countless other cats/kittens at any given moment.

People are straight up nutso to make it a bigger issue.

[-] Ajen@sh.itjust.works 4 points 5 months ago

That's not love. I'm sorry for your cat.

[-] MedicPigBabySaver@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago

Fuck off, dipshit.

[-] iamericandre@lemmy.world 14 points 5 months ago

The absurdity here is you feel the need to express an unwanted opinion about the way someone else spends their money.

[-] MedicPigBabySaver@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago
[-] Ajen@sh.itjust.works 2 points 5 months ago

No, they have more money than you. If someone can afford to pamper their pet, why shouldn't they?

[-] MedicPigBabySaver@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago

It's not "pamper" to provide expensive medical care. It's mostly selfish. You sound as dumb as they.

[-] Ajen@sh.itjust.works 3 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

You should probably work on your grammar if you're going to insult other people's intelligence.

[-] MedicPigBabySaver@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago

Gee, whiz... U must b right. GFY.

[-] Emerald@lemmy.world 9 points 5 months ago

It's absurd how some people think animals should only be exploited for making money

[-] MedicPigBabySaver@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago

I don't. It just seems more justified to spend a lot on vet care. I've always adopted from shelters.

[-] Harbinger01173430@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago

...it's just a pet. Give them some love, food, housing and that's all we need, as it's always been since we tamed the first pet animal. No need for fancy stuff

[-] MedicPigBabySaver@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago

True and there is a boatload of other animals stuck in shelters waiting for a nice home. No need to prolong things when it's impossible to know how the pet is actually feeling about the extended treatments.

[-] Harbinger01173430@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago

Yeah and if the current pet has to go to the next life, just adopt another and treat them well too. Life comes and goes.

this post was submitted on 27 Mar 2024
976 points (100.0% liked)

Political Memes

5234 readers
2088 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS