991
Life goals (lemmy.dbzer0.com)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] protist@mander.xyz 14 points 9 months ago

Is this going to be their last job? Lots of employers verify the last 3 employers or last 5 years

[-] Hyperreality@kbin.social 71 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Lots of employers don't verify at all, especially for low level stuff.

Companies are also unlikely to provide much more than the start and end date of employment. No point taking any risks, no benefit from warning another company.

[-] protist@mander.xyz 18 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

To each their own I guess...I work in healthcare and this is a very real thing that has negatively impacted people I've known who have quit without notice

Edit: Who is downvoting this one?! Fuck those hospital staff, I guess

[-] tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip 27 points 9 months ago

Have you never had a job that didn't even go on your resume? I worked part time at a video store for some extra cash while I was waiting for a career position to start. I gave the heads up when I was leaving but if the manager had been a dickbag or something I would've fucked them over with no ragerts. We have zero context for this (probably fake) text.

[-] funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works 21 points 9 months ago

I live in Georgia USA my employment laws explicitly state I can be fired or quit for any reason or no reason. As much as that sucks, I could quit because I don't like my boss' new haircut and that's ironically more legally protected than me being fired for being bisexual.

[-] protist@mander.xyz 3 points 9 months ago

Whether or not it's legal to quit or fire someone isn't the topic though, this is about your previous employer communicating your termination status to a prospective employer

[-] funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works 4 points 9 months ago

I assumed this connection was obvious

  • I quit cuz of a haircut
  • I get a new job
  • employer calls old job
  • they cannot ask why or how I left because the law is I can leave for any and no reason
[-] protist@mander.xyz 5 points 9 months ago

they cannot ask why or how I left because the law is I can leave for any and no reason

Just because you can legally quit for any reason at any time does not mean your prospective employer can't ask your previous employer why or how you left. These are 2 different things

[-] funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works 3 points 9 months ago

If they misrepresent the method of your termination in any way you can potentially sue for defamation, so, yeah, they can say what they want as long as they want to get sued.

[-] protist@mander.xyz 1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Sure, but all your previous employer has to do is be honest. If you tell your boss you quit effective immediately, that's "resignation without notice" at most companies. You can try to sue for defamation if this costs you a future job, but your previous employer has their documentation lined up and you will lose

[-] poke@sh.itjust.works 10 points 9 months ago

I haven't the slightest clue why people are mass downvoting your real experience here. Within many career paths, everything you've said is true.

[-] grue@lemmy.world 15 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

I haven’t the slightest clue why people are mass downvoting your real experience here.

Because although the obsequious attitude he's advocating for might be individually advantageous, it's damaging to society (i.e. workers' power, collectively) and sure as fuck shouldn't be encouraged!

[-] RaoulDook@lemmy.world 5 points 9 months ago

No, that's ridiculous. It's not damaging to anyone. It's the reality of the serious career world, and if you want a good career in reality (vs a worker's revolution or whatever in your fantasy) it would be wise to listen.

References are a real thing. Employment history is a real thing. These are checked by HR and hiring managers for serious career jobs, when an applicant is being considered. I have received direct confirmation of this from 2 jobs where I was hired, from my references and former employers who told me that the new employer called them to ask about me.

[-] protist@mander.xyz 2 points 9 months ago

Original commenter who has been downvoted to hell here. I'vs spent half my life as a front-line worker and half my life in management, and in management I fight like hell for my people in the face of the greedy corporate bullshit we're handed down from on high.

That said, if you're going to be on my healthcare staff, I and all your colleagues need to be able to trust you. If you've demonstrated a pattern of quitting without notice, to me that demonstrates a lack of planning and/or frustration tolerance, and that makes me hesitant to trust you.

I get lots of people aren't working in jobs that aren't as high stakes as healthcare though

[-] sukhmel@programming.dev 2 points 9 months ago

That makes sense, although it would have been easier to understand (for me, at the very least) if someone commented that right away after downvoting

[-] RaoulDook@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago

It's a very real thing in many real career paths. It's also relevant to the Golden Rule; do unto others as you would have them do unto you.

If your job was decent and they treat you OK, treat them decently in return. That's how you get good references and advance your career.

The alternative is to keep having shitty jobs that make you want to leave without giving notice I guess.

[-] PatFussy@lemm.ee 2 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

You are getting downvoted because the lemmitard hive associates your name with a downvote. Nothing to do with what you said.

[-] Paddzr@lemmy.world 21 points 9 months ago

I'm a manager. No, I don't care. Agencies will because they want to see you a service. But even they don't go as far as more than 1. 2 references are rare.

I've dealt with plenty of applications and agencies. I don't think it's an insignificant sample size and experience.

[-] protist@mander.xyz 5 points 9 months ago

I'm not talking about references though. I'm also a manager, I've done tons of references, and most are glowing. I'm talking about employment verification, which HR often handles totally separate from the hiring manager. Obviously this is going to vary based on organization and policy, and the entire concept seems deeply unpopular here lol

[-] Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world 15 points 9 months ago

Employment verification isn't allowed to answer personal questions which would include the text above. HR contacts HR with the question, "Was this person employed on X through X dates." The reply is yes or no. The manager doesn't get involved.

[-] protist@mander.xyz 3 points 9 months ago

Employment verification can absolutely include a description of the separation, eg "resignation with notice," "resignation without notice," or "terminated for cause." Lots of people saying this can't be said, but no one has cited any source because it's false

[-] Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

no one has cited any source

What is your source?

Quora has verified CEO's and Professors saying only dates and position are given out by HR.

[-] protist@mander.xyz 3 points 9 months ago

Here's the first hit I got on Bing™. My real source is a decade of experience hiring people.

[-] Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Your link isn't relevant because it is about being fired, not quitting.

But from your link:

"Many organizations have policies that limit their staff to providing only dates of employment and job titles when inquiries are made about past employees. Others may be more willing to share information with prospective employers."

So your statement only applies to your situation as your link confirms.

I hired people too. In only one situation where any ex employee was caught stealing from a client did I ever share anything negative. And that was only because the company who called was also a former customer.

[-] protist@mander.xyz 2 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

I like how you end your post with an example of you doing the thing you're saying companies don't do lol

Of course this varies by organization and policy, but it's a real thing that many companies do. "Terminated with cause" aka fired is just one of several separation categories companies may share

[-] Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

I wasn't HR. It wasn't HR calling HR to verify employment. It was a former customer calling for a reference. So yes it can happen that if that OP used the company as a reference, the former manager could take the call and say, "He quit without 2 weeks notice." It isn't standard as your own link confirmed. But that's not hr verifying employment.

"Terminated with cause”

This wasn't terminated with cause, fired or anything like that. The post is about an employee who quit. They are allowed to quit.

[-] protist@mander.xyz 1 points 9 months ago

I don't know what you're arguing against here, my entire point is that there are some companies that communicate separation status by policy, whether that's "terminated for cause," "resigned without notice," or "resigned with notice," and that "resigned without notice" can negatively impact job opportunities at some companies.

[-] Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

So if someone calls your HR department asking for employment dates, you will volunteer information that wasn't asked?

And how is the new employer going to know where you worked if you don't share it.

[-] protist@mander.xyz 1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

If someone tries to verify employment at my previous job, they will be directed to https://theworknumber.com/, which a metric fuckton of businesses use. When they access the information on that site, they will find my company's HR department has uploaded the name, dates of employment, and reason for separation. I don't understand why you think I'm somehow a proponent or advocate of this, I'm literally just communicating that it exists and is real

Regarding not sharing your previous employer, you're welcome to choose to lie on your resume, but I'm not going to

[-] acceptable_pumpkin@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago

I believe they can also ask the question “is this employee eligible for rehire?”

[-] grue@lemmy.world 10 points 9 months ago

...the entire concept seems deeply unpopular here

You're simping for the bourgeoisie in !leftymemes. WTF did you expect?

[-] protist@mander.xyz 3 points 9 months ago

Guess I'll retreat to my hole and let the proletariat continuing giving each other tips on worsening their spiral into destitution

this post was submitted on 31 Jan 2024
991 points (100.0% liked)

Lefty Memes

4352 readers
415 users here now

An international (English speaking) socialist Lemmy community free of the "ML" influence of instances like lemmy.ml and lemmygrad. This is a place for undogmatic shitposting and memes from a progressive, anti-capitalist and truly anti-imperialist perspective, regardless of specific ideology.

Serious posts, news, and discussion go in c/Socialism.

If you are new to socialism, you can ask questions and find resources over on c/Socialism101.

Please don't forget to help keep this community clean by reporting rule violations, updooting good contributions and downdooting those of low-quality!

Rules

Version without spoilers

0. Only post socialist memes


That refers to funny image macros and means that generally videos and screenshots are not allowed. Exceptions include explicitly humorous and short videos, as well as (social media) screenshots depicting a funny situation, joke, or joke picture relating to socialist movements, theory, societal issues, or political opponents. Examples would be the classic case of humorous Tumblr or Twitter posts/threads. (and no, agitprop text does not count as a meme)


1. Socialist Unity in the form of mutual respect and good faith interactions is enforced here


Try to keep an open mind, other schools of thought may offer points of view and analyses you haven't considered yet. Also: This is not a place for the Idealism vs. Materialism or rather Anarchism vs. Marxism debate(s), for that please visit c/AnarchismVsMarxism.


2. Anti-Imperialism means recognizing capitalist states like Russia and China as such


That means condemning (their) imperialism, even if it is of the "anti-USA" flavor.


3. No liberalism, (right-wing) revisionism or reactionaries.


That includes so called: Social Democracy, Democratic Socialism, Dengism, Market Socialism, Patriotic Socialism, National Bolshevism, Anarcho-Capitalism etc. . Anti-Socialist people and content have no place here, as well as the variety of "Marxist"-"Leninists" seen on lemmygrad and more specifically GenZedong (actual ML's are welcome as long as they agree to the rules and don't just copy paste/larp about stuff from a hundred years ago).


4. No Bigotry.


The only dangerous minority is the rich.


5. Don't demonize previous and current socialist experiments or (leading) individuals.


We must constructively learn from their mistakes, while acknowledging their achievements and recognizing when they have strayed away from socialist principles.

(if you are reading the rules to apply for modding this community, mention "Mantic Minotaur" when answering question 2)


6. Don't idolize/glorify previous and current socialist experiments or (leading) individuals.


Notable achievements in all spheres of society were made by various socialist/people's/democratic republics around the world. Mistakes, however, were made as well: bureaucratic castes of parasitic elites - as well as reactionary cults of personality - were established, many things were mismanaged and prejudice and bigotry sometimes replaced internationalism and progressiveness.



  1. Absolutely no posts or comments meant to relativize(/apologize for), advocate, promote or defend:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS