202
submitted 11 months ago by gAlienLifeform@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

The NYPD is spending $390 million on a new radio system that will encrypt officers’ communications — reversing a near-century-old practice of allowing the public and the press to listen to police dispatches.

Archived at https://ghostarchive.org/archive/eqTTk?wr=true

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] agitatedpotato@lemmy.world 31 points 11 months ago

Its illegal for citizens to encrypt their own radio transmissions, so no one else can legally do this.

[-] pennomi@lemmy.world 7 points 11 months ago

Right, and that’s morally wrong. Not only should they be able to, they should be required to do so.

[-] SCB@lemmy.world 7 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Putting regulations on ham radio that require encryption just increases the barrier of entry for ham radio for no reason.

[-] Dubiousx99@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago

How so? Your WiFi broadcast is encrypted. Your cellphone signal is also encrypted. The FCC doesn’t bar encryption. https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/CFR-2014-title47-vol5/pdf/CFR-2014-title47-vol5-sec90-553.pdf
Now this last point is only relevant for the US but generally laws governing radio transmissions are fairly similar around the world.

[-] GrayBoltWolf@lemmy.world 13 points 11 months ago

In HAM radio, encryption is forbidden, which would be the most equivalent to police radio.

[-] Dubiousx99@lemmy.world 6 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

HAM radio is amateur radio, rules and frequencies are established with the goal of promoting amateur use. Emergency service use would be a professional use and are licensed separately. The statement that citizens are not allowed to encrypt traffic should instead say that HAM radio operators are not allowed to encrypt their communications in accordance with their license.

[-] SkybreakerEngineer@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago

Yeah, that's not how FCC or ITU licensing works

[-] skuzz@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

I swear there used to be a law on the books that specifically said this, and it included police radio as they use the RF spectrum owned by the People. Police radio would be unencrypted and it would just contain the day-to-day traffic, and anything sensitive they'd transmit via other means like Nextel or even before that, the police phone booths.

IIRC it was one of those "check and balance" things to keep police honest. Although I haven't been able to find any law stating this, so perhaps I am mis-remembering some other law.

As for encryption in practice, cellular is encrypted, as others mentioned WiFi is encrypted, satellite communications are encrypted, a whole bunch of radio traffic is encrypted.

To counter @pennomi@lemmy.world , no, all transmissions should not be encrypted. The lack of openness and transparency by creating closed systems means there's no more "watching the watchers" and we have to take organizations in power at their word. Most human communication dating back centuries was not encrypted, and humanity got along just fine.

Likewise, when we assume our communications are "secure" we all are much more willing to share things over networks that we probably shouldn't. It makes security on the human side inherently lazy. Think about all the things people probably share over iMessage that they shouldn't. Apple has the keys to every conversation. A bad actor could gain access to a whole bunch of peoples' personal data they just assume is safe.

There are places where encryption should be used, but it should be used thoughtfully, not just, "lock it all down." It creates a dangerous complacency factor.

It is a very gray area topic that does not have one universal answer.

Edit: Formatting.

this post was submitted on 22 Nov 2023
202 points (100.0% liked)

News

23275 readers
2990 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS