105
submitted 11 months ago by silence7@slrpnk.net to c/climate@slrpnk.net
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] casmael@lemm.ee 4 points 11 months ago

This is a stupid argument. Even ignoring the obvious whataboutism, it’s like arguing peasants were responsible for the Norman conquest because they didn’t ’advocate for Harold hard enough’, or because they ‘didn’t convince Edward the Confessor to have a child’.

[-] eatthecake@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago

What whataboutism?

The general public have known about climate change for decades and made little to no effort at doing anything about it. We have elected climate change deniers, made Bezos a billionaire and bought bigger and bigger cars all whilst claiming it's all completely out of our control. Grow up and take just a little responsibility for your choices.

[-] casmael@lemm.ee 5 points 11 months ago

Meh I don’t think you have a very clear understanding of this topic. The American public voted for gore, the British public voted for corbyn. Both elections were stolen. Oil companies spent vast unimaginable sums of money popularising the terms ‘climate change’ and ‘carbon footprint’ to minimise public conception and maximise the concept of personal responsibility. Global climate disaster is not a personal problem, it’s a systemic problem of governance, and it needs systemic governmental solutions.

[-] eatthecake@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago

Ok, so we're not responsible for anything we do. We are completely controlled by our government and corporate overlords. We are incabable of thinking for ourselves or making any decisions not dictated by marketing and anyone daring to suggest we should consume less is asinine. Maybe we really deserve what's coming to us.

[-] 1847953620@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

I mean, people in the U.S. have the largest impact on the environment compared to other first-world countries. And first world countries have a much, much larger impact on the environment compared to the rest of the world. It's not linear, either. I agree with the argument that much more culpability rests on those with more power, but I think that also translates into socioeconomic power individually.

I also agree that there is a blame-shifting propaganda campaign, but I think that also includes a point about not blaming consumerism, which also is a huge determinant in the status quo.

Personally, I think as usual, complex topics will have complex solutions; I think you're both right up until the point where it excludes each other's points. No-one is forcing anyone to choose only one thing to work on.

[-] AgentOrangesicle@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

Oh, we can totally blame consumerism. We just can't do so entirely and relieve ourselves of the burden of the future because we found a partial root cause.

[-] AgentOrangesicle@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

It turns out it's beef, not donuts.

While I'm a nihilist at heart, I can't righteously shift the blame on to the average, dying-from-poverty < 38 year old. For decades, we've known that corporate interests are what drives the largest amount of climate change (and that it's the engine that will likely kill all of us before a changing climate does). Not since the 90's (arguably earlier) has it been an individual and his dollar.

Grow up and take a little responsibility in your communication.

[-] eatthecake@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago

"His dollar"? Responsible communication lol

There's plenty of blame for everyone in western countries at least. Profit drives corporations and those profits come from people buying their crap without caring about the consequences. Blame business all you like but corporate profits don't exist in a vacuum.

[-] AgentOrangesicle@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago

...but also the larger issue - younger generations have never had the economic power to invest in the outcome of the world, which kinda sucks, lol.

[-] AgentOrangesicle@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

I'm sorry you don't understand the conventions of the English language if that's what you mean to imply.

I'm a furry. I bathe in trans content.

"Do not cite the Deep Magic to me, Witch. I was there when it was written."

this post was submitted on 18 Nov 2023
105 points (100.0% liked)

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

5205 readers
610 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world.  About 1C of total warming.  Second chart:  about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability.  Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases.  About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS