381

ABCnews

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] negativeyoda@lemmy.world 175 points 1 year ago

The 2 party system is horseshit, but this is your recurring reminder that the greens are not worth your vote.

Any party serious about affecting change does so at the local level first. The fact that the greens consistently try to get attention with symbolic candidacies at the national level while being fuck all out of touch with school boards and local politics paints them as diva opportunists at best and bad faith progressive spoilers at worst.

This is coming from someone who agrees with most of West's platform at face value

[-] technicalogical@lemmy.world 53 points 1 year ago

You know who was involved with the Green Party back in the early 2000s? Kyrsten Sinema.

[-] negativeyoda@lemmy.world 71 points 1 year ago

I mean, you don't even need to go that far back. 2016 green presidential candidate Jill Stein literally rubbed elbows with Putin and Mike Flynn in 2015

[-] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 1 year ago

she went there to confront Putin.

[-] chase_what_matters@lemmy.world 35 points 1 year ago
[-] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 1 year ago

this isn't a rebuttal. it's an appeal to ridicule.

[-] chase_what_matters@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago

Oh I understood the tone and it made me laugh. Sorry you got downvoted tho

[-] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 1 year ago

Lemmy's great because downvotes don't matter

[-] negativeyoda@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago
[-] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 year ago

poorly: she didn't have a translator

[-] assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

So she's grossly inept? She didn't consider how she would actually talk to him? I don't want someone like that in higher office.

[-] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 year ago

he can speak English. he just refuses to do it in public

[-] JJROKCZ@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago

Then she’s even more of an idiot. You don’t enter a tyrants court to confront them unless you want to be the latest occupent of the gibbet

load more comments (123 replies)
this post was submitted on 19 Aug 2023
381 points (100.0% liked)

politics

19103 readers
3103 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS