652
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] mr_satan@lemmy.zip 9 points 3 days ago

Omitting source maps doesn't prevent that.

[-] mack@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 3 days ago

no it doesn't, and I am very aware that if anything runs on someone's computer then it can get replicated. but it gets slightly harder, also to reverse-engineer it or find potential fallacies. as well as source maps on prod are just a waste of bandwidth

[-] mr_satan@lemmy.zip 2 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Dunno, this "harder" argument while valid sounds just like false security. That's why I don't see much weight in it.

As for bandwidth, source maps are not automatically pulled from server, so it also seems like a false issue to me.

[-] Ibaudia@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago

No, but it's a sensible security measure. Anything to make it harder.

[-] mr_satan@lemmy.zip 4 points 3 days ago

That's the thing, it's not actually a security measure. Security through obscurity is not security. It can provide false security impression that is more harmful in my opinion.

Having source maps can encourage proper security practices. Which, in my books, very much outweighs any security benefits of hiding them.

this post was submitted on 04 Nov 2025
652 points (100.0% liked)

Programmer Humor

27264 readers
979 users here now

Welcome to Programmer Humor!

This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!

For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.

Rules

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS