[-] jazzfes@lemmy.ml 1 points 3 weeks ago

You absolutely defended Putin trying to make him sound left wing. Why?

[-] jazzfes@lemmy.ml 1 points 3 weeks ago

So you are saying that there is a fine line between fascism and capitalism, yes? What would that line be? And why would we chose capitalism over fascism?

[-] jazzfes@lemmy.ml 1 points 3 weeks ago

Mate, it clearly doesn't. I mean your own link refers to Russia being run by the mob. Many EU countries have still unions with power. So, really what are you talking about better worker protections? That is utterly absurd!

[-] jazzfes@lemmy.ml 1 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

"In Russia under Mafia rule we get four weeks of vacation" WTF???? I mean that is some great advancement of left thinking. We let the mob rule and get some base holidays in return that are more than in the US but less than EU. Are you for real?

[-] jazzfes@lemmy.ml 1 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Calling Putin in any sense left is absolutely wrong. The left is not exactly thriving in Russia is it?

[-] jazzfes@lemmy.ml 0 points 3 years ago* (last edited 3 years ago)

I think the problem people see is more with creating an equivalence of political opinion and mental health.

The full quote about anti-capitalism doesn't say anything about what makes someone an extremist. It doesn't say anything about rational criticisms and irrational ones it just relates political attitudes. It doesn't say anything about how we would separate rational criticism from extremism. That is a problem, no?

The take home message doesn't help at all when a dissident deals with an oppressive system. E.g. how would that message be applied in Germany in 1933? Or 1939? Or 1942? I don't think it can at all. How would it be applied to say US intervention, or colonisation? Again, I don't think the message would hold up.

Do you think that the scientific method is applied here in an appropriate way?

1
submitted 3 years ago by jazzfes@lemmy.ml to c/parenting@lemmy.ml

Excerpt:

"One of my four-year-old twins is obsessed with death. She wants to know everything about dying. Again and again, she asks me to tell her about what happens when people die. Initially, I was a little surprised by her fascination with ‘died’ people, as she calls them, but then it became clear that she was thinking a lot about this whenever she was quiet.

‘Will you tell me more about dying. What happens when people die?’ she asks me every night before bed.

‘Their bodies stop working. Their hearts stop working,’ I tell her.

‘Is this what happened with Naanaa?’

Naanaa – my father, their grandfather – died in November last year. The twins met him only once, just before their third birthday when we visited India in 2019, although we tried to speak regularly over FaceTime. We were due to visit again in early 2020, but then the COVID-19 pandemic struck, and slowly he became more ill, more frail; the loneliness and isolation of the lockdown, and the lack of adequate healthcare during these weeks and months, took their toll on him.

Preschool children can make sense of death, but only through their parent’s grief, and this is clearly what is happening here: I’d travelled to India and stayed for a week after my father’s funeral and was very open with my children about my sadness. I want them to understand that their grandfather is dead, and I want them to know him, if only through my memories. I also want to normalise talking about death going hand-in-hand with life, especially as right now, with the world in the midst of an unprecedented pandemic crisis, my children hear my husband and I talking about death so often."

2
submitted 4 years ago by jazzfes@lemmy.ml to c/australia@lemmy.ml

The whole line of arguing is just aweful...

1
submitted 4 years ago by jazzfes@lemmy.ml to c/football@lemmy.ml

There are some good articles on the upcoming Euro 2020.

In particular I like the team guides, introducing each team with background, strengths and outlook

1
submitted 4 years ago by jazzfes@lemmy.ml to c/buddhism@lemmy.ml

"In Zen we say practice is nothing other than your everyday activity. If we view the Dharma as something special – a particular activity we treat as more sacred, or a state we hope to attain that will be of an entirely different nature than the mundane existence we currently endure – we’re missing the point. At the same time, if we think practice is nothing other than just continuing our half-awake, habitual way of living, we’re also missing the point! What is the nature of our life and practice? Zen Master Dogen explores this koan in his essay “Kajo,” or “Everyday Activity.”"

1
submitted 4 years ago by jazzfes@lemmy.ml to c/parenting@lemmy.ml

Except the number is wrong and they are the leader...

1
submitted 4 years ago by jazzfes@lemmy.ml to c/australia@lemmy.ml

This was just too funny :) 2020 though

1
submitted 4 years ago by jazzfes@lemmy.ml to c/parenting@lemmy.ml

"In newborns with a very low birth weight, continuous skin-to-skin contact immediately after delivery, even before the baby has been stabilized, can lower mortality by 25%. This is according to a study published in The New England Journal of Medicine that was organized by the WHO on the initiative of researchers at Karolinska Institutet focusing on low- and middle-income nations.

One of the most effective approaches to avoid newborn mortality is to keep the newborn and mother in constant skin-to-skin contact, often known as “kangaroo mother care” (KMC). The World Health Organization (WHO) currently recommends that skin-to-skin contact begin as soon as a low-weight infant is stable enough, which usually takes several days for babies weighing less than 2 kg at birth. "

I thought this one is super interesting.

1
submitted 4 years ago by jazzfes@lemmy.ml to c/australia@lemmy.ml

"The new regulations could, for example, allow a massive charity like the St Vincent de Paul Society or UnitingCare to be stripped of charity status if one of their tens of thousands of volunteers attends a protest and does not move on when directed by police."

1
submitted 4 years ago by jazzfes@lemmy.ml to c/buddhism@lemmy.ml

The fragrance of joss sticks hangs in the air, while in the background there is the constant murmur of monks reciting their mantras. When you experience a ceremony in the Golden Temple of Elista, you'd be forgiven for believing that you're no longer in Europe – but you definitely haven't left the continent. Elista is the capital of Kalmykia. The autonomous federal republic of Russia lies between the Caucasus and Caspian Sea in the southern Russian steppes, and geographically is part of Europe. It is the only predominantly Buddhist region – a piece of Asia on the European continent.

1
submitted 4 years ago by jazzfes@lemmy.ml to c/parenting@lemmy.ml
1
submitted 4 years ago by jazzfes@lemmy.ml to c/parenting@lemmy.ml

When I tell someone that I run a centre that brings philosophy into children’s lives, much of the time I’m greeted with puzzlement, and sometimes open scepticism. How can children do philosophy? Isn’t it too hard for them? What are you trying to do, teach Kant to kindergarteners? Or, somewhat more suspiciously, what kind of philosophy are you teaching them?

These reactions are understandable, because they stem from very common assumptions – about children and about philosophy. Central to our work at the Center for Philosophy for Children at the University of Washington is the conviction that we ought to challenge beliefs about children’s limited capacities, and to expand our understanding of the nature of philosophy and who is capable of engaging in it. As one seven-year-old put it: ‘In philosophy, we’re growing our minds.’

Most of our philosophy sessions with children are in public elementary schools; the aim is to discover what topics the children want to think about, and to foster discussions and reflection about these subjects. I don’t think of what I do as teaching philosophy, though. The point is not to educate children about the history of philosophy, nor to instruct them in the arguments made by professional philosophers.

2
submitted 4 years ago by jazzfes@lemmy.ml to c/australia@lemmy.ml

Human rights groups – and parliament’s own human rights committee – say a new law pushed through parliament gives the government the power to indefinitely detain refugees, potentially for the rest of their lives.

[-] jazzfes@lemmy.ml 0 points 4 years ago

HTPC

I haven't bought a monitor / TV in probably 8 years but was recently thinking about it.... however really disliked that pretty much all TVs today are Smart TVs which actually made me wonder:

When selecting the monitor, what do you need to check when you want one that will work well for sports / soccer?

view more: ‹ prev next ›

jazzfes

joined 4 years ago
MODERATOR OF