[-] LifeGivesYouLemmys@lemmy.ml 6 points 4 weeks ago

You're changing the subject. Complicit and being to blame are different. You only do this "complicit" deflection when cornered with the FACT that Israel is responsible for its actions. Which canned response will you parrot in response to this?

[-] LifeGivesYouLemmys@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 month ago

Yes we all understand the only things you can focus on just accidentally elect trump

[-] LifeGivesYouLemmys@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 month ago

No one believes you

[-] LifeGivesYouLemmys@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 month ago

Yes. Unless you're ignorant.

[-] LifeGivesYouLemmys@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 month ago

No, you are the one making people mad. And since it's a fuck ton of people, you're probably the problem. But I know realizing that would take an ounce of self reflection, which you don't have.

[-] LifeGivesYouLemmys@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 month ago

Yeah, there are several ways I think they are violating rules. Copy pasting long walls of text should be an open and shut case of spam, for one.

[-] LifeGivesYouLemmys@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 month ago

You might be right that this is all their motivation is, but the timing and singular topic of interest is far too suspicious for me to ignore. I mean they definitely take pleasure in being a deranged hall monitor, though, don't get me wrong.

As for accusing them of being a troll... We are simply discussing a hypothetical user. No one has mentioned any username. No rules broken here!

[-] LifeGivesYouLemmys@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 month ago

Yeah I definitely think you are onto something. The audience is much smaller but the advantage is that a lot of people here really are so left they despise Democrats and would probably be easier to convince not to vote than your typical Democratic voter. Trolling campaigns here would have a much more concentrated target audience. They already know they don't need to convince conservatives on mainstream social media.

[-] LifeGivesYouLemmys@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 month ago

You're being too generous by thinking they give two shits about third parties. That's just the angle they've chosen for Lemmy.

[-] LifeGivesYouLemmys@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 month ago

You apparently are pretty confused. "you have to" and "you would" are extremely different phrases, and I never once implied they were similar. Only that you wouldn't need to pretend "the articles are interesting" is your motivation, in a context which implicates you as sketch af, if you weren't sketch af.

You'd simply explain it and avoid thousands of replies telling you how horrible you are. I guess it's possible you're a masochist who likes being insulted, but I think the other explanation is much more likely ;)

[-] LifeGivesYouLemmys@lemmy.ml 9 points 11 months ago

StAlInIsT tRaNsItIoN

Yep sounds like a total not-idiot to me!

view more: ‹ prev next ›

LifeGivesYouLemmys

joined 1 year ago