115
submitted 1 year ago by ZeroCool@feddit.ch to c/science@lemmy.world
all 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] glimse@lemmy.world 56 points 1 year ago

List the bird names you cowards

[-] null@slrpnk.net 21 points 1 year ago

Tits and boobies come to mind.

Sorry, what were we talking about? Birds?

[-] AlPastor2560@lemmy.world 23 points 1 year ago

I must say, I will appreciate more descriptive names when trying to identify certain birds.

[-] ParsnipWitch@feddit.de 5 points 1 year ago

Many Latin and Greek names of birds are descriptive. For example what people often call the "tit" bird is actually Parus major, which you could roughly translate into "a bit bigger". And they are the biggest of the tit birds.

And another "tit" actually is called Lophophanes cristatus. Which roughly means "showing the comb (lophophanes) with hood (cristatus)".

[-] AlPastor2560@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

I never knew that. That’s pretty cool.

[-] Smoogs@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago
[-] asdfasdfasdf@lemmy.world 22 points 1 year ago

I couldn't find a single example of a racist bird name in that article. You'd think they would give one.

[-] betterdeadthanreddit@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago
[-] infinitepcg@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Yet often it was his own stubborn and uncompromising nature that defined his life – his choices paint a picture of a man who was unable to heed the words of others. This undendinly antagonistic nature cost him friends, honours and ultimately put him into the dark role of colonialist.

He was "stubborn and uncompromising", which makes him "antagonistic", therefore a colonialist and racist. That's a pretty low bar. I don't think it makes sense to define racism in a way that makes all 19th century naturalists racist.

[-] Catoblepas 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

You could have also picked the dude that desecrated indigenous graves to do phrenology.

Edit: Jesus Christ you left out that this dude was a literal colonizer in New Zealand. He was an officer in a militia during the New Zealand Wars.

He was also a committee member of The New Zealand Company, which existed to systemically colonize New Zealand.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_John_Swainson#New_Zealand_estate

So maybe it is slightly misleading to say he was labeled racist for being “antagonistic”??

[-] infinitepcg@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Admittedly, I only checked this one article. I think it's hard to judge how evil he really was. Either way, not a hill I'm going to die on.

That's why people should be concerned. There's likely an ulterior motive here.

[-] Afghaniscran@feddit.uk 20 points 1 year ago

I'm curious what the ulterior motive for renaming birds could be?

[-] BustinJiber@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago

Obviously it's about globalist world domination plot

I have no fucking idea but it only makes sense there would be one, if there truly was no bigotry behind their original names.

[-] ZeroCool@feddit.ch 16 points 1 year ago

Calm down there Alex Jones

[-] Someology@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

To sell new bird guide editions, obviously.

[-] mriormro@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago

Lol, what? What exactly is concerning about renaming birds to be more descriptive?

Not everything is a conspiracy, my guy.

[-] Potatos_are_not_friends@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

First, they rename birds.

And then, they'll make all of our kids gay trans Korean lizard people!!!!

READ BETWEEN THE LINES SHEEPLE

[-] PetDinosaurs@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

This is a terrible source, as is Lemmy tradition.

Here's a better source I really wish that op would have been better about that. It's linked in the article they linked.

It appears that they are concerned with the tradition that the first person that scientifically describes the species gets to name it.

And, well, those people have been white.

[-] asdfasdfasdf@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

Seems like stupid rationale IMO.

[-] PetDinosaurs@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Do you think artists should be able to name their works?

Why shouldn't scientists also be able to name their works?

[-] asdfasdfasdf@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

That's exactly what I'm saying. They should be able to.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] I_Fart_Glitter@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago
[-] PetDinosaurs@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

You actually seem to have got it.

Here's a better source that suggests that they are interested in changing birds named after people, rather than birds named after slurs. It's linked in this article. I really hope that shames op. We need to be better.

Whether or not those people were bigots, they were probably white and male. Same as the anatomists that named the lady parts.

There's just a tradition of the first person to scientifically describe a "thing" getting to name it.

It's not great, but people that get to travel the world describing species and knowing enough to scientifically describe lady parts, etc are not poor people, at least until post war science. They still would have been mostly white and male, but they wouldn't have had to be as much independently wealthy.

[-] Shou@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

The tradition of namin something after another person does not apply to anatomy. The tradition there is to use latin which describes its function, appearance and/or location in the body. Except the men who wanted to name women's anatomy after themselves. Going as far as to make stuff up, and even name structures that weren't part of the female reproductive organs but merely seemed like it.

[-] populustree 16 points 1 year ago

ok what bird said the n word

[-] BzzBiotch@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

Twas a Southern Black Tit but it was talking to its homey.

[-] SkybreakerEngineer@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Papa ooma mow mow

[-] Someology@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

Good tactic to make everyone need to buy new editions of bird guide books.

[-] tanja 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

But which bird will be renamed to X?

[-] Smoogs@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

The titters

[-] nevemsenki@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

Can't wait to periodically rename everything every ~70 years as societal standards change.

[-] ZeroCool@feddit.ch 10 points 1 year ago

Can’t wait to periodically rename everything every ~70 years as societal standards change.

Well, I guess you can take solace in the fact that unless you're in grade school right now you probably won't be alive the next time the American Ornithological Society decides to re-examine the english names for birds.

Even those still in grade school shouldn’t be concerned as most of these bird species won’t survive climate change on the track it is currently taking

[-] Vandals_handle@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

I believe if species being renamed were known and named by Indigenous peoples, that name is the proper name to use. These organisms were not discovered by western science any more than the continent was discovered by westerners. Not only would it be a small sign of respect but would help protect Indigenous language and culture.

[-] 5BC2E7@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Finally. I think it’s fair to name a bird after you if you are its creator. Being the first person to document it doesn’t mean much to me and certainly doesn’t mean they can name a bird after themselves.

Edit: i guess the downvoters believe that a bird is not discovered until a white man sees it.

this post was submitted on 02 Nov 2023
115 points (100.0% liked)

science

14767 readers
68 users here now

A community to post scientific articles, news, and civil discussion.

rule #1: be kind

<--- rules currently under construction, see current pinned post.

2024-11-11

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS