229
submitted 1 year ago by philz@lemmy.world to c/worldnews@lemmy.ml

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] fleece@pawb.social 30 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

This is haunting.

There's no gore or anything, it's just twisted metal and cables. Still, seeing it and thinking "humans were alive in there mere days ago" made my gut drop. It's not like looking at wreckage of an old ship or plane or something, it's different. Because it's so small, it feels more intimate. Like looking at a coffin vs looking at a graveyard

[-] artaxthehappyhorse@lemmy.ml 16 points 1 year ago

The death of one man is a tragedy, the death of millions is a statistic

[-] Monkeyhog@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago

The death of a billionaire however, is hilarious 🤣

[-] atp2112@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

The death of 4 is aquatic praxis

[-] Thorny_Thicket@sopuli.xyz 4 points 1 year ago

I truly hope you people are not being serious..

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Kovari@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago

How is the death of anyone hilarious? Does it matter how much you have in your pocket book which will determine the level of hilarity to you? That's cold. I surely hope you have more empathy in person.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Willer@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

Omg so tru. *Comits genocide

[-] seesaw@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago

So Holocaust is not a tragedy? That's what you're saying?

[-] maiskanzler@feddit.de 10 points 1 year ago

No, it's just a common saying that shows how people react to this sort of news. It's a bit cynical but not untrue.

[-] Liempong_pagong@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 year ago

Hoho!

u/seesaw is looking for a reason to fight.

It's a common saying you buffoon.

[-] seesaw@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

"common saying"

How the fuck is that a common saying? That's a quote attributed to genocidal Stalin and it's a complete bullshit statement. Whoever repeats a moronic statement (and also very wrong) is also a moron. Death of millions is not just a statistics, it's a much bigger tragedy.

Edgy idiots trying to be cool with statements of dictators

[-] Liempong_pagong@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago

Well i don't assign its meaning. I'm just informing of what that phrase is. If anything. You're the one appearing to be edgy with your unchecked emotion and tone of replies.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Cynosure@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Weren't the occupants cremated instantly?

[-] FigMcLargeHuge@sh.itjust.works 16 points 1 year ago
[-] Liempong_pagong@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago

Diluted

since they were in the water

[-] sp00nix@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

Like corn in a can.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] PowerCrazy@lemmy.ml 30 points 1 year ago

Wow I didn't know they were going to recover it at all. Pretty cool. Can't wait to read about how shitty the design was.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] kiwifoxtrot@lemmy.world 21 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Both titanium support rings were recovered intact. These are what bonded the carbon fiber hull to the titanium ends. There isn't any evidence of carbon fiber still attached in the photos/ videos of the debris.

Edit: more photos

[-] Spandex_Nightmare@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago

So the front AND the back fell off? Is that normal?

[-] sp00nix@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 year ago

Doesn't matter, it happened outside of the environment.

[-] cryball@sopuli.xyz 3 points 1 year ago

From your link it seems that even the front titanium hemisphere is still relatively intact.

[-] angrytoadnoises@lemmygrad.ml 21 points 1 year ago

I did not expect this thing to actually be hauled to shore. Kind of thought they were just going to leave it. How much did it cost to pull that thing up?

[-] maporita@lemmy.ml 20 points 1 year ago

Hopefully, examination of the wreckage will yield valuable information about the cause of the failure and help future designs of deep-sea submersibles.

[-] Anticorp@lemmy.world 26 points 1 year ago

We already know how to build submersibles. Engineers told the CEO that this submersible was not built to spec and not safe. He fired them.

[-] stealthnerd@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Sure we do but there's always something to be learned from a failure. This sub was unique in it's design and while that design ultimately failed, the knowledge gained from the failure could potentially lead to an improved design that maintains some of the benefits such as low cost and high occupancy.

[-] Nogami@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

Also when carbon fibre is used on other applications such as in planes and such. There is always something to be learned about failure modes which can be used to make future applications safer.

For instance, in this case where exactly did the failure point happen? Was it at at the bonding area, one of the end caps, or in the middle of the tube, etc.

[-] deeoh@vlemmy.net 19 points 1 year ago

Normally I’d agree with you, but we already know that carbon fiber is weaker in compression than in tension and that you really shouldn’t attach it to titanium either, due to their differences in malleability.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Superperspective@feddit.it 16 points 1 year ago

These are the non-pressurised systems that would have gotten the least damage most likely.

[-] JshKlsn@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago

Ya the only damage would be from the implosion and shrapnel. Everything else was sitting at the same pressure, so there's nothing really going on to cause damage.

It's weird seeing huge pieces that look relatively undamaged. Looks like you can just throw that frame with all the electronics in the spare parts bin and call it a day lol

[-] Cayenne05dingos@geddit.social 13 points 1 year ago
[-] philz@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago
[-] ironsoap@lemmy.one 20 points 1 year ago
[-] redtea@lemmygrad.ml 5 points 1 year ago

How does one remove the tracking from a website?

[-] deegeese@sopuli.xyz 10 points 1 year ago

FYI you formatted the link backwards and it didn't work. Links should be formatted as

[Link Title](http://the_url)

Correct link is source

[-] mook@lemmy.ml 11 points 1 year ago

Interesting - I had imagined it being imploded into bits like the simulations on the news show.

[-] philz@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

I believe this is the outer portion. The carbon fiber shell imploded and is probably not recoverable.

[-] cyanarchy@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago

I'm certainly no expert but I understand submarines have an inner and outer hull. The inner hull has to withstand the pressure of the deep but the outer hull does not. The inner hull would be crushed into bits but the outer hull and any equipment in-between would likely be ripped into large chunks as such a violent event occurs inside of it.

[-] Nogami@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Subs have dual hulls so they can fill the void between them with water to sink, or air to float, but they don’t dive anywhere near as deep. Most regular naval subs operate above 800 meters. They only have to be below the surface of the water for stealth, not at the bottom of the ocean.

This craft was a single hull design as far as I’m aware, designed with a rigid hull to try and counteract the pressure at the bottom.

[-] dotancohen@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

like the simulations on the news show

Why would you put any faith in a simulation by an organization that has no knowledge of the domain?

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] AppaYipYip@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

I wonder if they recovered the Xbox controller?

[-] Thorny_Thicket@sopuli.xyz 10 points 1 year ago

Controllers like that are used on nuclear attack submarines aswell so that is not the issue even though it might seem funny to someone not familiar with this stuff.

Those companies have made billions of them over several decades. It's much more reliable to go with a one like that than to develop a new one from scratch. Submarines don't implode because it was steered by a logitech controller

[-] Arbiter@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Nuclear subs do not however use them for propulsion. Something like a very basic input delay or other Bluetooth issue could be catastrophic.

[-] maiskanzler@feddit.de 3 points 1 year ago

In a video I heard the CEO say they have spare ones on hand, just in case. But still, having my life depend on a Bluetooth device seems just wrong. Why not go with a direct cable? Much less to go wrong!

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Anticorp@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

It was a Logitech controller. I guess he couldn't spring for the pricier Xbox controller.

[-] FigMcLargeHuge@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 year ago

Have you priced one of those Pro Controllers?

[-] redtea@lemmygrad.ml 2 points 1 year ago

Is it ironic when the billionaires who live by cutting costs get stung by cost cutting?

[-] Raphael@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Can we share Bezos in the next batch of billionaires?

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 28 Jun 2023
229 points (100.0% liked)

World News

32285 readers
723 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS