Proof by intimidation:
is left as an exercise for the reader.
can be trivially shown.
as shown in many introductory texts.
As explained in my prior work
(prior work gives no explanation)
proof by recess:
I saw this in a HCI paper once. The prior work was just a review of current science, and had no findings in regards to the topic stated.
I did not point it out to the guy. We all knew 80% of what's written in the field was bullshit.
Trust me et al bro
As shown in the full version (the full version never got made)
I know its all fun and alike.
But please, please get your shit together.
We as people have to do better science.
So many papers and "research" nowadays are just a shitshow of words which chatgpt will make even worse.
A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.
Rules
This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.
