I didn’t do it
I didn’t even know it existed
It was probably an earthquake
I am more sure he did it now than before his statement’s.
Ok, so it's confirmed?
There should be "russia denies" community on fediverse
There, is. It's called hexbear.
While I would trust Putin considerably less far than I could throw him, I have to say that the Finland-Estonia pipeline seems like a kind of odd target for the Kremlin. I don't think that it has huge capacity, and if Russia is truly ready to start intentionally screwing with EU undersea infrastructure, I don't see why they'd go small. You'd take out the pipelines from Norway. You're gonna piss off the EU either way, so might as well maximize the leverage you get.
googles
Yeah. Norway moved like 116 bcm via pipeline last year. Estonia-Finland, the Balticconnector, can do 2.6 bcm. If you want to dick over the EU, you take out Norway's pipelines, not Finland's.
According to WP, an Estonian Navy statement two days ago said that it looks like it might have had a ship anchor dragged over it, and a telecom cable was also damaged. That doesn't necessarily mean that it wasn't an intentional move by the Kremlin to provide plausible deniability, but it's compatible with being an accident. And ships do apparently manage to cause cable or pipeline damage now and then, so it's not something unheard-of.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Balticconnector
On 10 October 2023, the Finnish government announced that the damage to the pipeline may have been deliberate and caused by "external activity". A telecoms cable near the pipeline was also damaged. The leak is being investigated by the Finnish Border Guard and the Finnish Security Intelligence Service. Norwegian seismological institute NORSAR reported that it detected a "probable explosion" 40 km north of Paldiski (roughly where Balticconnector and Nord Stream intersect) on the 8 October at 01:20 local time, though a few days later investigators stated the damage "appears to have been mechanical, not an explosion".
On 11 October 2023, an Estonian Navy commander stated that Finnish images of the damage showed the pipeline's concrete cover had been broken off and the pipeline was badly damaged on one side and out of position. A Finnish member of the European Centre of Excellence for Countering Hybrid Threats suggested that one possibility was that a ship's anchor had dragged over the pipeline. Five large ships had been near the pipeline shortly before the incident.
It could be a retaliation of sorts for Finland joining NATO and Estonia being one of the biggest supporters of Ukraine relative to their GDP. Or it could be something as simple as that Balticconnector is really close to a Russian port. I don't think that a thing you've said is wrong, just that there are a few other factors that might push Russia towards choosing Balticconnector over a Norwegian pipe
Could be a small provocation or test to see what they get away with, a show of force ("remember, you're vulnerable") and as you said, plausible deniability.
They can't do any damage that would seriously disrupt the EU without making it extremely likely that Article 5 would be invoked and Russia would now be fighting an open kinetic war on many fronts.
Все про Україну Everything about Ukraine