237
all 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Dimmer@leminal.space 71 points 2 days ago

The post rightly points out that Citizen United is one of the cornerstones of contemporary American politics and the continued success of Trumpism.

Regrettably, when a law is enacted to make existing laws meaningless, there appears to be no legal path to undo it.

[-] just_another_person@lemmy.world 33 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

There is no "law" that was passed to enable Citizens United, it was a court case that was interpreted in a stupid way that enabled all of the current political happenings to be possible by allowing "corporations" the ability to flood the zone with cash.

Just need to pass laws that ban that.

[-] spankmonkey@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago

You pass more laws to undo the undoing of prior laws.

Unfortunately it takes way more time to do things right than to undo or undermine things.

[-] Dimmer@leminal.space 8 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

The genius of CUvsFEC is they basically made it sure there’s no way back. If a legislator dare to revert this, they will be out-raised and voted out.

I disagree. There was a path to getting it unfucked for a period of time through states and potential constitutional amendment, but the Republicans (naturally) tanked it.

If all of this happening right now does anything, it should definitely be illustrated based on current events this can't happen again. We'll need to put the sitting Republicans quick to stop it though.

[-] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Regrettably, when a law is enacted to make existing laws meaningless, there appears to be no legal path to undo it.

I've seen this before. Who is out there claiming Citizens United is a law?? And there is always a legal path. If space aliens show up and eat Musk there's a legal path to convict them. Not that we should.

[-] Atelopus-zeteki@fedia.io 40 points 1 day ago

"The problem with CU’s rationale is that, when applied in today’s media setting, it discriminates against the viewpoints of everyone else. When the world’s richest man spent $44 billion to purchase a social media platform to amplify his own political views, he chilled the free political speech of everyone else. Ditto when he spent an additional $288 million to get Trump elected, largely through disinformation. When Trump promised fossil fuel giants who donated $1 billion to his campaign that he would gut environmental laws as their payback, he chilled the free speech of everyone who depends on clean air and water but can’t pony up a cool billion."

[-] BugKilla@lemmy.world 39 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

I am sorry my American friends but it is going to get a lot worse before it returns to the status quo and I doubt that it will even remotely get better ever again. As a nation you have lived off the spoils of victory and sided with despots because you have been happy with the crumbs that rich capitalists throw at you. Only when your conscience got the better of you, have you engaged in altruism and even then it was for the furthering of corporate interests.

You will no longer command the respect of your allies and trust of those that you once claimed to protect. Your friends will now treat you with suspicion and maybe contempt. The oligarchs and religious zealots will eat your organs while you're distracted by culture wars, racism, fear and entertainment.

Many of you will say "Well, America first!", without realising that it has been that way for almost a century except it has really been "America's wealthiest first". I really feel a great sadness, like losing a parent to dementia in that there are two deaths: one when they are no longer themselves anymore and the other when the vessel fails.

Vale.

[-] aaron@infosec.pub 14 points 2 days ago

Pay and privacy wall

[-] boydster@sh.itjust.works 8 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)
[-] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)
[-] ThePowerOfGeek@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

A painful read, but a good article.

this post was submitted on 02 Mar 2025
237 points (100.0% liked)

politics

20563 readers
4820 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS