Where the 2024 GOP Presidential Candidates Stand on Voting Rights and Democracy (www.democracydocket.com)

submitted 1 year ago by BagOfHammers@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world

10 comments fedilink hide all child comments

all 11 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[-] matchphoenix@feddit.uk 30 points 1 year ago

TL;DR: On voting rights, Insert_Candidate is a classic Republican vote suppressor.

[-] treefrog@lemm.ee 13 points 1 year ago

We still are living with Nixon's war on hippie and black voting rights, i.e. the war on drugs.

So yeah, classic and continuous.

[-] BioDriver@lemmy.world 23 points 1 year ago

Tl;dr - on its neck

[-] ScrollinMyDayAway@lemm.ee 13 points 1 year ago

Moderator: What is your stance on Voting Rights and Democracy?

Any Candidate: The real question the American People are concerned about is the woke gays grooming our children. I for one am against it! Next subject, please.

[-] SaintWacko@midwest.social 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

What a beautiful title. Don't even have to read the article to know the outcome. [America,] where the GOP candidates stand on voting rights and democracy

[-] dodo@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago

No offense, but halfway through skimming this I started seriously wondering if it was satire. It was about as negative as you can get. How about we set down this republican vs. democrat stuff and start just going pro-america. If anything is going to destroy america, it is going to be this continuous "us vs. evil them" dialogue.

[-] snooggums@kbin.social 19 points 1 year ago

It is the continuous us vs evil them becsuse the Republicans keep doing evil things. Like taking away voting access, demonizing people for being LGBTQ+, advocating violence, and trying to overthrow a secure election where the Dem candidate won both the popular and electoral college vote.

Fuck you.

[-] Moobythegoldensock@lemm.ee 18 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It was about as negative as you can get.

What did it say that was wrong? It appears to me that negative people are doing negative things, and that’s the reason this article must exist.

If a candidate wants to kick puppies, and someone reports on it, we don’t chastise the reporter for reporting on it: we tell the candidate they need to stop kicking puppies.

[-] argo_yamato@lemm.ee 6 points 1 year ago

Unfortunately it is not satire. The Republican candidates are anti-democracy and are all for laws making it harder to vote for those who generally do not vote Republican.

[-] ScrollinMyDayAway@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Pro-America is a nice goal. But if one of the two political parties in this country is:

Anti Voting Rights

Anti Education

Anti Environment

Anti Library

Anti Women's Rights

Anti Freedom of Religion (except for, y'know, that one)

Anti Veteran

Anti Doing Anything About Gun Violence

Anti Healthcare

Anti Tax Reform

Anti Goddamned Peaceful Transfer Of Power After An Election

Then you'll have to excuse me if I don't buy the 'both sides are the same' bullshit.

this post was submitted on 22 Aug 2023

66 points (100.0% liked)

politics

19089 readers

3490 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News