Are you sure you selected the correct mount point? You can also give it the partition directly
yes I'm sure.
root@archiso /mnt/arch # cat ./etc/fstab
# Static information about the filesystems.
# See fstab(5) for details.
#
# /dev/nvme0n1p2
UUID=145c0d63-05f8-43a2-934b-7583cb5f6100 / btrfs rw,relatime,ssd,discard=async,space_cache=v2,subvolid=256,subvol=/@ 0 0
# /dev/nvme0n1p2
UUID=145c0d63-05f8-43a2-934b-7583cb5f6100 /.snapshots btrfs rw,relatime,ssd,discard=async,space_cache=v2,subvolid=260,subvol=/@.snapshots 0 0
# /dev/nvme0n1p1
UUID=4BF3-12AA /boot vfat rw,relatime,fmask=0022,dmask=0022,codepage=437,iocharset=ascii,shortname=mixed,utf8,errors=remount-ro 0 2
# /dev/nvme0n1p2
UUID=145c0d63-05f8-43a2-934b-7583cb5f6100 /home btrfs rw,relatime,ssd,discard=async,space_cache=v2,subvolid=257,subvol=/@home 0 0
# /dev/nvme0n1p2
UUID=145c0d63-05f8-43a2-934b-7583cb5f6100 /var/cache/pacman/pkg btrfs rw,relatime,ssd,discard=async,space_cache=v2,subvolid=259,subvol=/@pkg 0 0
# /dev/nvme0n1p2
UUID=145c0d63-05f8-43a2-934b-7583cb5f6100 /var/log btrfs rw,relatime,ssd,discard=async,space_cache=v2,subvolid=258,subvol=/@log 0 0
Could you do an offline btrfs-check
? (no --repair
!)
root@archiso ~ # lsblk
NAME MAJ:MIN RM SIZE RO TYPE MOUNTPOINTS
loop0 7:0 0 673M 1 loop /run/archiso/airootfs
sda 8:0 0 476.9G 0 disk
└─sda1 8:1 0 476.9G 0 part
sdb 8:16 0 119.2G 0 disk
└─sdb1 8:17 0 119.2G 0 part
sdc 8:32 1 14.4G 0 disk
├─sdc1 8:33 1 778M 0 part
└─sdc2 8:34 1 15M 0 part
nvme0n1 259:0 0 931.5G 0 disk
├─nvme0n1p1 259:1 0 511M 0 part
└─nvme0n1p2 259:2 0 931G 0 part
root@archiso ~ # btrfs check /dev/nvme0n1p2
Opening filesystem to check...
Checking filesystem on /dev/nvme0n1p2
UUID: 145c0d63-05f8-43a2-934b-7583cb5f6100
[1/7] checking root items
[2/7] checking extents
[3/7] checking free space tree
[4/7] checking fs roots
[5/7] checking only csums items (without verifying data)
[6/7] checking root refs
[7/7] checking quota groups skipped (not enabled on this FS)
found 514161029120 bytes used, no error found
total csum bytes: 496182240
total tree bytes: 1464221696
total fs tree bytes: 813809664
total extent tree bytes: 57655296
btree space waste bytes: 248053148
file data blocks allocated: 4385471590400
referenced 512920408064
btrfs check /dev/nvme0n1p2 4.15s user 1.66s system 62% cpu 9.316 total
What RAID profile are you using on your filesystem? Checksum failures on RAID1/5/6/10 aren't fatal because the block is read from a different mirror.
RAID? how can I check? I'm not using RAID as far as I know
You'd probably know unless you didn't set it up yourself!
btrfs device usage /mountpoint
Well I never set up any raid on my systems
root@archiso /mnt/arch # btrfs device usage .
/dev/nvme0n1p2, ID: 1
Device size: 931.01GiB
Device slack: 0.00B
Data,single: 520.01GiB
Metadata,DUP: 6.00GiB
System,DUP: 16.00MiB
Unallocated: 404.99GiB
Could you show us the raid type and info with btrfs fi us /home
, and then the errors encountered on each disk with btrfs dev sta /home
?
root@archiso /mnt/arch # btrfs fi us .
Overall:
Device size: 931.01GiB
Device allocated: 526.02GiB
Device unallocated: 404.99GiB
Device missing: 0.00B
Device slack: 0.00B
Used: 480.21GiB
Free (estimated): 447.51GiB (min: 245.02GiB)
Free (statfs, df): 447.51GiB
Data ratio: 1.00
Metadata ratio: 2.00
Global reserve: 512.00MiB (used: 0.00B)
Multiple profiles: no
Data,single: Size:520.01GiB, Used:477.49GiB (91.82%)
/dev/nvme0n1p2 520.01GiB
Metadata,DUP: Size:3.00GiB, Used:1.36GiB (45.45%)
/dev/nvme0n1p2 6.00GiB
System,DUP: Size:8.00MiB, Used:80.00KiB (0.98%)
/dev/nvme0n1p2 16.00MiB
Unallocated:
/dev/nvme0n1p2 404.99GiB
root@archiso /mnt/arch # btrfs device stats .
[/dev/nvme0n1p2].write_io_errs 0
[/dev/nvme0n1p2].read_io_errs 0
[/dev/nvme0n1p2].flush_io_errs 0
[/dev/nvme0n1p2].corruption_errs 19317
[/dev/nvme0n1p2].generation_errs 0
Few possibilities here:
Could be something wrong with the SSD - is it a Samsung one by any chance? There was a firmware issue that caused the SSD lifespan to degrade at a higher rate than normal... This article only covers the 980 but I believe there were a few models affected
https://www.tomshardware.com/news/samsung-980-pro-ssd-failures-firmware-update
It also could be that whatever files were corrupted have been deleted (maybe browser cache files etc.) or the allocated block is corrupted but contains no files within it. After running a scrub, the names of files within a corrupted block are shown in dmesg - if there's none then I think you're fine, but strongly consider replacing the SSD/updating its firmware/checking its SMART diagnostic data to see if its ok.
The error counter can be reset with btrfs dev sta --reset
to see if these errors pop up again after trying a resolution
It's a KINGSTON SA2000M81000G
. Here is a "datasheet".
I've looked up some of the inode numbers in the logs and they point to some application state data in /var so reinstalling application could bring those files back.
I've never touched SMART before since I've assumed it's an HDD thing. Anyway. I've installed smartmontools. nvme ssds don't report smart stats like for hdds so this answer suggested looking for Percentage used in stead.
root@archiso ~ # smartctl -a --test=long /dev/nvme0n1 | grep "Used"
Percentage Used: 2%
It could be true that the firmware is not optimal but I could not find any news about that like you have for the 980. gnome software should keep firmware up to date in the background but just for good measure I ran it in live environment as well. I will probably get a new ssd at some point in the future and maybe use this old one for non critical storage in the future.
Linux
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).
Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.
Rules
- Posts must be relevant to operating systems running the Linux kernel. GNU/Linux or otherwise.
- No misinformation
- No NSFW content
- No hate speech, bigotry, etc
Related Communities
Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0